Mortality impact of achieving WHO cervical cancer elimination targets: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: WHO is developing a global strategy towards eliminating cervical cancer as a public health problem, which proposes an elimination threshold of four cases per 100 000 women and includes 2030 triple-intervention coverage targets for scale-up of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination to 90%, twice-lifetime cervical screening to 70%, and treatment of pre-invasive lesions and invasive cancer to 90%. We assessed the impact of achieving the 90-70-90 triple-intervention targets on cervical cancer mortality and deaths averted over the next century. We also assessed the potential for the elimination initiative to support target 3.4 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-a one-third reduction in premature mortality from non-communicable diseases by 2030. METHODS: The WHO Cervical Cancer Elimination Modelling Consortium (CCEMC) involves three independent, dynamic models of HPV infection, cervical carcinogenesis, screening, and precancer and invasive cancer treatment. Reductions in age-standardised rates of cervical cancer mortality in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) were estimated for three core scenarios: girls-only vaccination at age 9 years with catch-up for girls aged 10-14 years; girls-only vaccination plus once-lifetime screening and cancer treatment scale-up; and girls-only vaccination plus twice-lifetime screening and cancer treatment scale-up. Vaccination was assumed to provide 100% lifetime protection against infections with HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58, and to scale up to 90% coverage in 2020. Cervical screening involved HPV testing at age 35 years, or at ages 35 years and 45 years, with scale-up to 45% coverage by 2023, 70% by 2030, and 90% by 2045, and we assumed that 50% of women with invasive cervical cancer would receive appropriate surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy by 2023, which would increase to 90% by 2030. We summarised results using the median (range) of model predictions. FINDINGS: In 2020, the estimated cervical cancer mortality rate across all 78 LMICs was 13·2 (range 12·9-14·1) per 100 000 women. Compared to the status quo, by 2030, vaccination alone would have minimal impact on cervical cancer mortality, leading to a 0·1% (0·1-0·5) reduction, but additionally scaling up twice-lifetime screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 34·2% (23·3-37·8), averting 300 000 (300 000-400 000) deaths by 2030 (with similar results for once-lifetime screening). By 2070, scaling up vaccination alone would reduce mortality by 61·7% (61·4-66·1), averting 4·8 million (4·1-4·8) deaths. By 2070, additionally scaling up screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 88·9% (84·0-89·3), averting 13·3 million (13·1-13·6) deaths (with once-lifetime screening), or by 92·3% (88·4-93·0), averting 14·6 million (14·1-14·6) deaths (with twice-lifetime screening). By 2120, vaccination alone would reduce mortality by 89·5% (86·6-89·9), averting 45·8 million (44·7-46·4) deaths. By 2120, additionally scaling up screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 97·9% (95·0-98·0), averting 60·8 million (60·2-61·2) deaths (with once-lifetime screening), or by 98·6% (96·5-98·6), averting 62·6 million (62·1-62·8) deaths (with twice-lifetime screening). With the WHO triple-intervention strategy, over the next 10 years, about half (48% [45-55]) of deaths averted would be in sub-Saharan Africa and almost a third (32% [29-34]) would be in South Asia; over the next 100 years, almost 90% of deaths averted would be in these regions. For premature deaths (age 30-69 years), the WHO triple-intervention strategy would result in rate reductions of 33·9% (24·4-37·9) by 2030, 96·2% (94·3-96·8) by 2070, and 98·6% (96·9-98·8) by 2120. INTERPRETATION: These findings emphasise the importance of acting immediately on three fronts to scale up vaccination, screening, and treatment for pre-invasive and invasive cervical cancer. In the next 10 years, a one-third reduction in the rate of premature mortality from cervical cancer in LMICs is possible, contributing to the realisation of the 2030 UN SDGs. Over the next century, successful implementation of the WHO elimination strategy would reduce cervical cancer mortality by almost 99% and save more than 62 million women's lives. FUNDING: WHO, UNDP, UN Population Fund, UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Germany Federal Ministry of Health, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Centre for Research Excellence in Cervical Cancer Control, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Compute Canada, and Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., & Jemal, A. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21492 · Cited by 84,109 · see citing works
Self-citationRonco, G., Dillner, J., Elfström, K. M., Tunesi, S., Snijders, P. J. F., Arbyn, M., Kitchener, H., Segnan, N., Gilham, C., Giorgi-Rossi, P., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62218-7 · Cited by 1,810 · see citing works
Brisson, M., Kim, J. J., Canfell, K., Drolet, M., Gingras, G., Burger, E. A., Martin, D., Simms, K. T., Bénard, É., Boily, M.-C., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30068-4 · Cited by 943 · see citing works
Self-citationArbyn, M., Smith, S. B., Temin, S., Sultana, F., & Castle, P. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k4823 · Cited by 851 · see citing works
Lew, J.-B., Simms, K. T., Smith, M. A., Hall, M., Kang, Y.-J., Xu, X. M., Caruana, M., Velentzis, L. S., Bessell, T., Saville, M., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(17)30007-5 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationCampos, N. G., Sharma, M., Clark, A., Lee, K., Geng, F., Regan, C., Kim, J., & Resch, S. (2017) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.12184 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationHealth and economic benefits of single-dose HPV vaccination in a Gavi-eligible country
Burger, E. A., Campos, N. G., Sy, S., Regan, C., & Kim, J. J. (2018) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.061 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- [3]FUTURE II Study Group Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions N Engl J Med 356 2007 1915 1927 17494925
- [4]Paavonen J Naud P Salmerón J Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women Lancet 374 2009 301 314 19586656
- [5]Joura EA Giuliano AR Iversen OE A 9-valent HPV vaccine against infection and intraepithelial neoplasia in women N Engl J Med 372 2015 711 723 25693011
- [6]Kavanagh K Pollock KG Cuschieri K Changes in the prevalence of human papillomavirus following a national bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination programme in Scotland: a 7-year cross-sectional study Lancet Infect Dis 17 2017 1293 1302 28965955
- [7]Bruni L Diaz M Barrionuevo-Rosas L Global estimates of human papillomavirus vaccination coverage by region and income level: a pooled analysis Lancet Glob Health 4 2016 e453 e463 27340003
- [8]Gallagher KE LaMontagne DS Watson-Jones D Status of HPV vaccine introduction and barriers to country uptake Vaccine 36 2018 4761 4767 29580641
- [11]Canfell K Caruana M Gebski V Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: results of the Compass pilot randomised trial PLoS Med 14 2017 e1002388 PMC5604935 28926579
- [12]Allemani C Matsuda T Di Carlo V Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries Lancet 391 2018 1023 1075 29395269 PMC5879496
- [13]Knaul FM Farmer PE Krakauer EL Alleviating the access abyss in palliative care and pain relief—an imperative of universal health coverage: the Lancet Commission report Lancet 391 2018 1391 1454 29032993
- [17]Simms KT Steinberg J Caruana M Impact of scaled up human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening and the potential for global elimination of cervical cancer in 181 countries, 2020–99: a modelling study Lancet Oncol 20 2019 394 407 30795950
- [18]Hall MT Simms KT Lew JB The projected timeframe until cervical cancer elimination in Australia: a modelling study Lancet Public Health 4 2019 e19 e27 30291040
- [19]Kim JJ Burger EA Regan C Sy S Screening for cervical cancer in primary care: a decision analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force JAMA 320 2018 706 714 30140882 PMC8653579
- [21]Brisson M Laprise JF Drolet M Comparative cost-effectiveness of the quadrivalent and bivalent human papillomavirus vaccines: a transmission-dynamic modeling study Vaccine 31 2013 3863 3871 23830974
- [22]Jit M Laprise JF Choi YH Brisson M Fewer than three doses of HPV vaccine Lancet Oncol 16 2015 e423 e424 26370345
- [24]Canfell K Kim JJ Kulasingam S HPV-FRAME: a consensus statement and quality framework for modelled evaluations of HPV-related cancer control Papillomavirus Res 8 2019 100184 PMC6804684 31505258
- [26]Rodin D Burger EA Atun R Scale-up of radiotherapy for cervical cancer in the era of human papillomavirus vaccination in low-income and middle-income countries: a model-based analysis of need and economic impact Lancet Oncol 20 2019 915 923 31151906 PMC7055962
- [27]Atun R Jaffray DA Barton MB Expanding global access to radiotherapy Lancet Oncol 16 2015 1153 1186 26419354
- [28]Liu G Sharma M Tan N Barnabas RV HIV-positive women have higher risk of human papilloma virus infection, precancerous lesions, and cervical cancer AIDS 32 2018 795 808 29369827 PMC5854529
- [29]Travassos AG Netto E Xavier-Souza E Predictors of HPV incidence and clearance in a cohort of Brazilian HIV-infected women PLoS One 12 2017 e0185423 PMC5628817 28981551
- [30]WHO Comprehensive cervical cancer control: a guide to essential practice 2nd edn. 2014 World Health Organization Geneva 25642554
- [33]Canfell K Shi JF Lew JB Prevention of cervical cancer in rural China: evaluation of HPV vaccination and primary HPV screening strategies Vaccine 29 2011 2487 2494 21211586
- [36]Hu L Bell D Antani S An observational study of deep learning and automated evaluation of cervical images for cancer screening J Natl Cancer Inst 111 2019 923 932 30629194 PMC6748814
- [37]WHO WHO guidelines for the use of thermal ablation for cervical pre-cancer lesions 2019 World Health Organization Geneva 31661202
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21660 · Cited by 108,699 · see citing works
Self-citationPlanning for tomorrow: global cancer incidence and the role of prevention 2020–2070
Soerjomataram, I., & Bray, F. (2021) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00514-z · Cited by 1,012 · see citing works
Self-citationBrisson, M., Kim, J. J., Canfell, K., Drolet, M., Gingras, G., Burger, E. A., Martin, D., Simms, K. T., Bénard, É., Boily, M.-C., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30068-4 · Cited by 943 · see citing works
Self-citationHPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences
Nishimura, H., Yeh, P. T., Oguntade, H., Kennedy, C. E., & Narasimhan, M. (2021) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003743 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Simms, K. T., Keane, A., Nguyen, D. T. N., Caruana, M., Hall, M. T., Lui, G., Gauvreau, C., Demke, O., Arbyn, M., Basu, P., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02600-4 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationBonjour, M., Charvat, H., Franco, E. L., Piñeros, M., Clifford, G. M., Bray, F., & Baussano, I. (2021) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(21)00046-3 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationWoo, Y. L., Khoo, S. P., Gravitt, P., Hawkes, D., Rajasuriar, R., & Saville, M. (2022) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol29100579 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Creagh, N. S., Boyd, L. A. P., Bavor, C., Zammit, C., Saunders, T., Oommen, A. M., Rankin, N. M., Brotherton, J. M. L., & Nightingale, C. E. (2023) · JCO Global Oncology · doi:10.1200/go.22.00297 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Cervical Cancer Elimination in India: Progress, Gaps, and the Priorities
Lakshmanasamy, R., Palaniraja, S., Suriyamoorthy, A., Oommen, A. M., Brotherton, J. M., & Basu, P. (2026) · International Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.2147/ijwh.s635866
- Authors
- Canfell, K., Kim, J. J., Brisson, M., Keane, A., Simms, K. T., Caruana, M., Burger, E. A., Martin, D., Nguyen, D. T. N., Bénard, É., Sy, S., Regan, C., Drolet, M., Gingras, G., Laprise, J.-F., Torode, J., Smith, M. A., Fidarova, E., Trapani, D., Bray, F., Ilbawi, A., Broutet, N., & Hutubessy, R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Harvard University (US)
- Université Laval (CA)
- Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval (CA)
- Union for International Cancer Control (CH)
- World Health Organization (CH)
- Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Canfell, Karen
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 395
- Issue
- 10224
- Pages
- 591-603
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- PMC
- PMC7043006
- OpenAlex
- W3003227613
- Cited by
- 650
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 89 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 41
- FWCI
- 58.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- World Health Organization
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Keywords
- cervical cancer elimination, cervical cancer mortality, HPV vaccination, cervical cancer screening, cervical cancer treatment, mortality averted, cervical precancerous lesions, cervical carcinogenesis, HPV infection, Sustainable Development Goal 3.4, non-communicable disease mortality, catch-up vaccination
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Child, Child, Preschool, Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Income, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Mortality, Vaccination, World Health Organization, Papillomavirus Infections, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Early Detection of Cancer, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review