Cited by 115Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes and associated disorders

Once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin degludec as part of a basal-bolus regimen in individuals with type 1 diabetes (ONWARDS 6): a phase 3a, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target trial

Open access
Russell-Jones, David, Babazono, Tetsuya, Cailleteau, Roman, Engberg, Susanne, Irace, Concetta, Kjaersgaard, Maiken Ina Siegismund, Mathieu, Chantal, Rosenstock, Julio +2 more·2023·The Lancet

Abstract

Background ONWARDS 6 compared the efficacy and safety of once-weekly subcutaneous insulin icodec (icodec) and once-daily insulin degludec (degludec) in adults with type 1 diabetes. Methods This 52-week (26-week main phase plus a 26-week safety extension), randomised, open-label, treat-to-target, phase 3a trial was done at 99 sites across 12 countries. Adults with type 1 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin [HbA 1c ] <10·0% [86 mmol/mol]) were randomly assigned (1:1) to once-weekly icodec or once-daily degludec, both in combination with insulin aspart (two or more daily injections). The primary endpoint was change in HbA 1c from baseline to week 26, tested for non-inferiority (0·3 percentage point margin) in all randomly assigned participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04848480, and is now complete. Findings Between April 30 and Oct 15, 2021, of 655 participants screened, 582 participants were randomly assigned to icodec (n=290) or degludec (n=292). At week 26, from baseline values of 7·59% (icodec) and 7·63% (degludec), estimated mean changes in HbA 1c were −0·47 percentage points and −0·51 percentage points, respectively (estimated treatment difference 0·05 percentage points [95% CI −0·13 to 0·23]), confirming non-inferiority of icodec to degludec (p=0·0065). Overall rate of combined clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia (baseline to week 26) was statistically significantly higher with icodec than degludec (19·9 vs 10·4 events per patient-year of exposure; estimated rate ratio 1·9 [95% CI 1·5 to 2·3]; p<0·0001). The rate was also statistically significantly higher with icodec than degludec when evaluated over 57 weeks (52 weeks plus a 5-week follow-up period). 39 serious adverse events were reported in 24 (8%) participants receiving icodec, and 25 serious adverse events were reported in 20 (7%) participants receiving degludec. One participant in the icodec group died; this was judged unlikely to be due to the trial product. Interpretation In adults with type 1 diabetes, once-weekly icodec showed non-inferiority to once-daily degludec in HbA 1c reduction at week 26, with statistically significantly higher rates of combined clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia. For icodec, time below 3·0 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) was at the threshold of the internationally recommended target (<1%) during weeks 22–26 and below target during weeks 48–52. Funding Novo Nordisk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02179-7

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A randomised open-label study of 582 adults with type 1 diabetes showed noninferiority of insulin icodec to daily insulin degludec at 26 weeks of treatment, with better outcomes at 52 weeks of treatment, although more clinically significant hypoglycaemic events occurred with insulin icodec.

    “A randomised openlabel study of 582 adults with type 1 diabetes showed noninferiority of insulin icodec to daily insulin degludec at 26 weeks of treatment, with better outcomes at 52 weeks of treatment, although more clinically significant hypoglycaemic events occurred with insulin icodec.87”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [87]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Of individuals identified with presymptomatic diabetes, approximately 85% have stage 1 and 15% stage 2.

    “Of individuals identified with presymptomatic diabetes, approximately 85% have stage 1 and 15% stage 2.4”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Study design and participants section describes adults with established type 1 diabetes who had received insulin injections for at least a year. The Results section reports treatment-group outcomes, not the distribution of presymptomatic diabetes stages. Searches for presymptomatic diabetes and stage 1/stage 2 found no passage supporting the 85%/15% figures; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russell-Jones, D., Babazono, T., Cailleteau, R., Engberg, S., Irace, C., Kjaersgaard, M. I. S., Mathieu, C., Rosenstock, J., Woo, V., & Klonoff, D. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • Tokyo Women's Medical University (JP)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • Magna Graecia University (IT)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Velocity Clinical Research (United States) (US)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • San Mateo Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Russell-Jones, David
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
402
Issue
10413
Pages
1636-1647
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W4387710695
Cited by
115
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 2
FWCI
23.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, insulin icodec, insulin degludec, multiple daily insulin injections, insulin aspart, HbA1c, non-inferiority, hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia risk, insulin dosing frequency
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Insulin, Long-Acting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review