Cited by 631Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsCerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis

Venous thromboembolic disease and combined oral contraceptives: results of international multicentre case-control study

Open access
World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone Contarception·1995·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91926-0

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most common clinical presentation of estrogen-related thrombosis is venous thromboembolism of the deep veins of the legs or pulmonary vessels, usually within the first few months of use.

    “The most common clinical presentation of estrogen-related thrombosis is venous thromboembolism (VTE) of the deep veins of the legs or pulmonary vessels, usually within the first few months of use.”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [100]

  • In an international case-control study across 21 centers, the World Health Organization reported in 1995 that increased risk of VTE was apparent within 4 months of starting CHCs, was unaffected by the duration of current type of CHC use, and returned to baseline within 3 months of discontinuing CHCs.

    “In an international case-control study across 21 centers, the World Health Organization reported in 1995 that increased risk of VTE was apparent within 4 months of starting CHCs, was unaffected by the duration of current type of CHC use, and returned to baseline within 3 months of discontinuing CHCs [100].”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [100]

  • In patients with thrombosis provoked by hormonal contraception, the risk of recurrence returns to baseline within one to three months of cessation of hormonal use.

    “In patients with thrombosis provoked by hormonal contraception, the risk is believed to return to baseline levels within one to three months of cessation of hormonal use [100, 107].”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [100]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone Contarception
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-12
Volume
346
Issue
8990
Pages
1575-1582
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W4247374640
Cited by
631
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
FWCI
34.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Keywords
venous thromboembolism, combined oral contraceptives, thrombosis risk, oral contraceptive use, case-control study
MeSH terms
Adult, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Developing Countries, Europe, Female, Humans, Progestins, Pulmonary Embolism, Risk Factors, Thromboembolism, Thrombophlebitis, Time Factors, Body Mass Index, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review