Cited by 203Design Education and PracticeUsability and User Interface DesignInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Dialogue in participatory design

Luck, Rachael·2003·Design Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0142-694x(03)00040-1

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some strategies to reveal tacit knowledge consist of conversation analysis of users' dialogue or asking participants to express their ideas by doing and enacting.

    “As participatory design scholars have noted, some of these strategies might consist, for instance, of the conversation analysis of users’ dialogue (Luck, 2003) or asking participants to express their ideas by doing and enacting (Akach et al., 2021; Sanders et al., 2010; Spinuzzi, 2005).”
  • Developing shared vocabularies between designers and stakeholders can help to share meanings and create mutual understanding.

    “Developing shared vocabularies between designers and stakeholders can help to share meanings and create mutual understanding (Luck, 2003; Martin-Hammond et al., 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luck, R.
Affiliations
University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
Luck, Rachael
Venue
Design Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
523-535
ISSN
0142-694X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037990632
Cited by
203
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Design Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
participatory design, user participation, design dialogue, preliminary design, inclusive design, language use, tacit knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review