Cited by 46Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentInnovative Human-Technology InteractionUsability and User Interface Design

Participatory Design and Design for Values

van der Velden, Maja, Mörtberg, Christina·2014·Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-007-6994-6_33-1

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Velden, M., & Mörtberg, C.
Affiliations
Linnaeus University (SE)
Venue
Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design
Published
2014
Pages
1-22
OpenAlex
W4210962553
Cited by
46
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
participatory design, design for values, co-design, power relations, democratic practice, mutual learning, healthcare design, public sector design, design process

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review