Cited by 134Gender Studies in LanguageDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesMedia, Gender, and Advertising

A hidden curriculum in Japanese EFL textbooks: Gender representation

Lee, Jackie F.K.·2014·Linguistics and Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.linged.2014.07.002

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, J. F. K.
Affiliations
Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Lee, Jackie F.K.
Venue
Linguistics and Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
27
Pages
39-53
ISSN
0898-5898 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150894156
Cited by
134
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
9.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Linguistics and Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
hidden curriculum, gender representation, EFL textbooks, Japanese language textbooks, gender-neutral vocabulary, titles of address, gender stereotypes, gender equality in education, textbook analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review