The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Perceived Organizational Support and Supportive Human Resource Practices in the Turnover Process
Abstract
A model investigating antecedents of perceived organizational support (POS) and the role of POS in predicting voluntary turnover was developed and tested in two samples via structural equation modeling. Both samples of employees (N = 215 department store salespeople; N = 197 insurance agents) completed attitude surveys that were related to turnover data collected approximately 1 year later. Results suggest that perceptions of supportive human resources practices (participation in decision making, fairness of rewards, and growth opportunities) contribute to the development of POS, and POS mediates their relationships with organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Further, POS is negatively related to withdrawal, but the relationships are also mediated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Testing Interaction Effects in LISREL: Examination and Illustration of Available Procedures
Cortina, J. M., Chen, G., & Dunlap, W. P. (2001) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442810144002 · Cited by 512
Cited by
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031757 · Cited by 1,462
Inclusive workplaces: A review and model
Shore, L. M., Cleveland, J. N., & Sanchez, D. (2018) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.003 · Cited by 1,034
Self-citationAlfes, K., Shantz, A. D., Truss, C., & Soane, E. C. (2013) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.679950 · Cited by 770
Perceived organizational support, career satisfaction, and the retention of older workers
Armstrong‐Stassen, M., & Ursel, N. D. (2009) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317908x288838 · Cited by 473
Shen, J., Dumont, J., & Deng, X. (2018) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601116664610 · Cited by 251
Retracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M., & Griffeth, R. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publishing
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-118
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4233977211
- Cited by
- 1,772
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 32.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
