Cited by 192Evaluation and Performance AssessmentPublic Policy and Administration ResearchHealth Policy Implementation Science

Getting to outcomes: a results-based approach to accountability

Wandersman, Abraham, Imm, Pamela, Chinman, Matthew, Kaftarian, Shakeh·2000·Evaluation and Program Planning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0149-7189(00)00028-8

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wandersman, A., Imm, P., Chinman, M., & Kaftarian, S.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Wandersman, Abraham
Venue
Evaluation and Program Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-08
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
389-395
ISSN
0149-7189 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028880339
Cited by
192
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evaluation and Program Planning (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Center for Substance Abuse Prevention
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
results-based approach, accountability, program planning, program evaluation, outcome measurement, continuous quality improvement, sustainability, program implementation, capacity building, best practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review