CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 752Primate Behavior and EcologyFace Recognition and PerceptionChild and Animal Learning Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative expression of hedonic impact: affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates.

Steiner, Jacob E, Glaser, Dieter, Hawilo, Maria E, Berridge, Kent C·2001·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
DOI 10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00051-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examines behavioral affective reactions elicited by tastes from eight newborn human infants, and from 27 other infant or adult primates. Non-human primates belonged to 11 species: three great apes (chimpanzee, orangutan, gorilla), three Old World monkeys (rhesus monkey, greater spot-nosed monkey, and red-capped mangabey), four New World monkeys (golden-handed tamarin, cotton-top tamarin, white tufted-ear marmoset, and Humboldt's night monkey), and one lemur (mongoose lemur). The taste of sucrose elicited homologous positive hedonic patterns of facial affective reactions from humans and other primates, whereas quinine elicited homologous aversive or negative affective patterns. The degree of similarity between human and other primate affective reaction patterns appeared to be strongly indicative of their phylogenetic relatedness. For example, affective reaction patterns of human infants and great apes were more similar to each other than either were to Old World monkeys or New World monkeys. Certain affective reaction components were found to be shared by humans and all primates, whereas other components were restricted to particular taxonomic groups. Finally, allometric timing parameters for the duration of components indicated that the 'same' affective reaction could have different durations in species of different size. These results show that both positive/negative valence and intensity of affective reaction may be quantitatively assessed in human and non-human primates, and indicate that taste-elicited affective reaction patterns of human infants are related systematically to those of other primate species.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00051-8

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 120 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lorenz, 1941, Vergleichende Bewegungsstudien an Anatinen, Supplement to Journal of Ornithology, 89, 194
  2. Peciña, 1992, Fourth ventricle microinjections of diazepam enhance hedonic reactions to taste, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 18, 1231

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–750 of 750

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Steiner, J. E., Glaser, D., Hawilo, M. E., & Berridge, K. C.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Berridge, Kent C
ORCID
Berridge, Kent C
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
53-74
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00051-8
OpenAlex
W2079573200
Cited by
752
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 43
FWCI
19.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
taste aversion, infants, non-human primates, sucrose, quinine, facial expressions, phylogenetic relatedness, great apes, Old World monkeys, New World monkeys, lemurs, allometric scaling, positive and negative valence, evolutionary homology
MeSH terms
Affect, Aging, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Behavior, Behavior, Animal, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Primates, Sweetening Agents, Taste, Videotape Recording, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review