Cited by 109Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Receptor subtype-specific dopaminergic agents and conditioned behavior

Beninger, Richard J., Hoffman, Diane C., Mazurski, Evalynn J.·1989·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Dopaminergic neurotransmission has been implicated in reward-related learning. With the advent of pharmacological agents that are relatively specific for D1 and D2 dopamine receptors, it has become possible to assess the role of these receptor subtypes in this form of learning. Antagonist studies have shown that either D1 or D2 receptor blockers produced extinction-like effects on operant responding for food, water or brain stimulation reward and in drug self-administration paradigms. They also blocked place preference learning based on amphetamine. Agonist studies showed that D2, but not D1 agonists were self-administered, produced place preferences and enhanced responding for conditioned reward. It may be that the dopaminergic signal at the D1 receptor is important for the establishment and maintenance of reward-related learning. From this point of view the effects of D1 antagonists can be understood. D2 antagonists may produce extinction-like effects because they lead to increased dopamine release and, therefore, indirectly mask the dopamine signal at the D1 receptor. D1 agonists may fail to produce reward effects because they, unlike D2 agonists, directly mask the dopaminergic signal at the D1 receptor.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0149-7634(89)80019-3

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 89 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gilbert, 1986, Dopamine and reward: Conditioned place preference induced by dopamine D2 receptor agonist, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 12, 938
  2. Nakajima, 1986, Suppression of operant responding in the rat by dopamine D1 receptor blockade with SCH 23390, Physiol. Psychol., 14, 111

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Beninger, R. J., Hoffman, D. C., & Mazurski, E. J.
Affiliations
Queen's University (CA)
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-06
Volume
13
Issue
2-3
Pages
113-122
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976403478
Cited by
109
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
dopamine receptors, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, reward learning, conditioned reward, self-administration, extinction, place preference, amphetamine, dopamine release
MeSH terms
Animals, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Psychological, Receptors, Dopamine, Reward, Self Administration, Dopamine Agents, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Dopamine Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review