Enrichment-dependent differences in novelty exploration in rats can be explained by habituation.
Abstract
In rats, exploratory activity and emotional reactivity towards novel stimuli reflect independent biological functions that are modulated differently by rearing experiences. Environmental enrichment is known to improve performance in exploratory tasks, while having inconsistent effects on emotionality. This study examined the effect of environmental enrichment on the behaviour of rats in two exploratory tasks. Male rats were reared under one of four conditions, differing in social and non-social complexity. At 9 weeks of age, exploration of a novel open field, and exploration of novel objects in the same open field following 24 h habituation, was assessed. Differences in social and non-social complexity of the rearing environment had inconsistent effects on exploration in the novel open field. In contrast, when rats were faced with novel objects in an otherwise familiar environment, exploration habituated faster with increasing stimulus complexity of the non-social environment. The social environment had no effect on this latter test. These findings indicate that environmental enrichment affects exploratory activity primarily through its effect on habituation to novelty. This effect depends on relative stimulus complexity of the rearing environment, but is independent of social factors. The present results further suggest that aversive tasks can obscure the expression of enrichment-dependent differences in habituation to novelty.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Complex housed rats habituate faster to novel situations.
“Previously we and others have shown that complex housed rats habituate faster to novel situations (Zimmermann et al., 2001; Moncek et al., 2004; van der Veen et al., 2015)”
From Effects of Maternal Deprivation and Complex Housing on Rat Social Behavior in Adolescence and Adulthood (2018) · cites this paper as Zimmermann et al., 2001
Cites
Effect of Neonatal Handling on Age-Related Impairments Associated with the Hippocampus
Meaney, M. J., Aitken, D. H., van Berkel, C., Bhatnagar, S., & Sapolsky, R. M. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3340858 · Cited by 1,074 · see citing works
Hall, F. S. (1998) · Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology · doi:10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v12.i1-2.50 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Early social deprivation disrupts attentional, but not affective, shifts in rats
Schrijver, N. C., & Würbel, H. (2001) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.115.2.437 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schrijver, N. C. A., Bahr, N. I., Weiss, I. C., & Würbel, H. (2002) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00790-6 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Self-citationLaboratory environments and rodents' behavioural needs: a review
Balcombe, J. P. (2006) · Laboratory Animals · doi:10.1258/002367706777611488 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Early-life handling stimulation and environmental enrichment
Fernández-Teruel, A., Giménez-Llort, L., Escorihuela, R. M., Gil, L., Aguilar, R., Steimer, T., & Tobeña, A. (2002) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00787-6 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Del Arco, A., & Mora, F. (2008) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2008.04.011 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Zhu, J., & Reith, M. (2008) · CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets · doi:10.2174/187152708786927877 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Environmental enrichment and the sensory brain: The role of enrichment in remediating brain injury
Alwis, D. S., & Rajan, R. (2014) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00156 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Environmental enrichment decreases responding for visual novelty
Cain, M. E., Green, T. A., & Bardo, M. T. (2006) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2006.08.007 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Kentrop, J., Smid, C. R., Achterberg, E. J. M., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Joëls, M., & van der Veen, R. (2018) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00193 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zimmermann, A., Stauffacher, M., Langhans, W., & Würbel, H.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Würbel, Hanno
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 11-20
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070604675
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
- Keywords
- environmental enrichment, novelty exploration, rearing conditions, social complexity, novel object exploration, open field exploration, emotional reactivity, rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arousal, Attention, Avoidance Learning, Exploratory Behavior, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Male, Problem Solving, Social Environment, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review