Cited by 170Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Amygdala, hippocampus and discriminative fear conditioning to context

Antoniadis, E·2000·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Various measures of fear have been shown to condition to a fearful context with different acquisition rates (Antoniadis EA, McDonald RJ. Fear conditioning to context expressed by multiple measures of fear in the rat, Behav Brain Res 1999;101(1):1-14). Freezing, locomotion, urination and preference are 'fast' measures of fear in that they discriminatively condition to context after a single training session, while ultrasonic vocalizations and defecation are 'slow' measures of fear given that they condition following three training sessions. In the present experiment we sought to assess the contribution of the amygdala and the hippocampus in this form of learning. Existing views differ on the degree of involvement of each memory structure. This discord probably emerges from the common use of non-discriminative paradigms and the assessment of a single measure of fear. With the use of a discriminative paradigm and the assessment of multiple measures of fear, results indicate that the amygdala is a memory structure that selectively mediates the conditioning of heart rate, and the hippocampus selectively mediates the conditioning of defecation and body temperature. The conditioning of preference, locomotion, freezing and ultrasonic vocalizations, necessitate the participation of both memory structures while the conditioning of urination does not seem to require the participation of either the hippocampus or the amygdala. The proposed view ascribes an equal role in fear conditioning…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00121-7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antoniadis, E.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Antoniadis, E
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-02
Volume
108
Issue
1
Pages
1-19
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154737719
Cited by
170
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
fear conditioning, contextual conditioning, amygdala, hippocampus, discriminative conditioning, heart rate, defecation, ultrasonic vocalizations, freezing, locomotion, micturition, body temperature, fear memory
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Body Temperature, Conditioning, Psychological, Defecation, Discrimination Learning, Fear, Heart Rate, Hippocampus, Male, Nerve Net, Urination, Vocalization, Animal, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review