PreprintCited by 296Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Context representations, context functions, and the parahippocampal–hippocampal system

Open access
Rudy, Jerry W.·2009·Learning & Memory

Abstract

Psychologists and neurobiologists have a long-standing interest in understanding how the context surrounding the events of our lives is represented and how it influences our behavior. The hippocampal formation emerged very early as a major contributor to how context is represented and functions. There is a large literature examining its contribution that on the surface reveals an array of conflicting outcomes and controversy. This review reveals that these conflicts can be resolved by building Nadel and Willner's dual-process theory of context representations. Two general conclusions emerge: (1) There are two neural systems that can support context representations and functions-a neocortical system composed primarily of perirhinal and postrhinal cortices and a hippocampal system that includes perirhinal, postrhinal, entorhinal cortices, and the hippocampal formation. (2) These two systems are not equivalent-some context representations and functions are uniquely supported by the hippocampal system. These conclusions are discussed in the context of canonical ideas about the special properties of the hippocampal system that enable it to make unique contributions to memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.1494409

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The hippocampus helps encode episodic and emotional information that arises during motivationally relevant events.

    “Likewise, the hippocampus, known for its contextual sensitivity (Fanselow, 2010; Hirsh, 1974, Rudy, 2009, Fanselow, 2010), helps encode episodic and emotional information that arises during motivationally relevant events.”

    From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Rudy, 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Nadel L, Willner J, Kurz EM. 1985. Cognitive maps and environmental context. In Context and learning (eds. P Balsam and A Tomie), pp. 385-406. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
  2. Randich A, Ross RT. 1985. Contextual stimuli mediate the effects of pre-and post-exposure to the unconditioned stimulus on condition suppress. In Context and learning (eds. PD Balsam and A Tomie), pp. 105-132.
  3. Thomas DR. 1985. Contextual stimulus control of operant responding in pigeons. In Context and learning (eds. PD Balsam and A Tomie), pp. 295-322. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rudy, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Rudy, Jerry W.
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2009-09-30
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
573-585
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2151803046
Cited by
296
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 17
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH 61316, R01MH061316)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
context representation, hippocampal formation, dual-process theory, perirhinal cortex, postrhinal cortex, entorhinal cortex, hippocampal-dependent memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Humans, Mental Processes, Parahippocampal Gyrus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review