The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our novel alternative to punishment builds on the reciprocal nature of the trust—the fact that people reciprocate voluntary trust68—as well as the conditional nature of human cooperation—the fact that negative reciprocity can be switched to positive reciprocity given sufficient cooperation levels44,69–71.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
In the citing paper
“More specifically, it has been observed that most people reciprocate trust when the initial act of trust is taken voluntarily68, e.g., as is the case with successful business organizations who foster a culture of trust by placing trust in others72–74.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
Self-citationERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.1.166 · Cited by 5,399
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
Langer, E. J. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311 · Cited by 3,909
Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4635.001.0001 · Cited by 3,428
A theory of sequential reciprocity
Dufwenberg, M. A., & Kirchsteiger, G. (2003) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003 · Cited by 1,895
Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments
Levine, D. K. (1998) · Review of Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1006/redy.1998.0023 · Cited by 1,374
Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive ToolboxPreprint
Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,367
Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Reply
Hoffman, E. N., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.1.340 · Cited by 1,146
Self-citationSocial Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games
Hoffman, E. N., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511528347.009 · Cited by 978
Self-citationOn the Nature of Fair Behavior
Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1093/ei/41.1.20 · Cited by 728
Measuring Beliefs in an Experimental Lost Wallet Game
Dufwenberg, M. A., & Uri Gneezy, B. (2000) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1999.0715 · Cited by 462
Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2000) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.203115 · Cited by 293
Friend-or-foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game
Burnham, T. C., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (2000) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00108-6 · Cited by 283
Self-citationIntentionality detection and “mindreading”: Why does game form matter?
McCabe, K., Smith, V. L. S., & LePore, M. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.8.4404 · Cited by 148
Self-citationReciprocity, Trust, and Payoff Privacy in Extensive Form Bargaining
McCabe, K., Rassenti, S., & Smith, V. L. S. (1998) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1998.0638 · Cited by 140
Self-citationGearing, F. O., Carroll, T. L., Richter, L., Grogan-Hurlick, P., Smith, A. D., Hughes, W. P., Tindall, A., Precourt, W. E., & Topfer, S. (1979) · Cited by 110
Fairness and survival in ultimatum and dictatorship games
Schotter, A., Weiss, A., & Zapater, I. (1996) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(96)00863-3 · Cited by 96
Equity or intention: it is the thought that counts
Nelson, W. R. (2002) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(01)00245-1 · Cited by 93
On the Nature of Fair BehaviourPreprint
Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 50
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001 · Cited by 2,416
“Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., et al. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000142 · Cited by 1,898
Psychological foundations of incentives
Fehr, E., & Falk, A. (2002) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/s0014-2921(01)00208-2 · Cited by 1,240
Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics
Smith, V. L. S. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803322156954 · Cited by 967
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McCabe, K. A., Rigdon, M. L., & Smith, V. L.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rigdon, Mary L.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267-275
- ISSN
- 0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107651934
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 70.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
- Keywords
- positive reciprocity, trust game, intention attribution, bargaining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
