The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our novel alternative to punishment builds on the reciprocal nature of the trust—the fact that people reciprocate voluntary trust68—as well as the conditional nature of human cooperation—the fact that negative reciprocity can be switched to positive reciprocity given sufficient cooperation levels44,69–71.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
In the citing paper
“More specifically, it has been observed that most people reciprocate trust when the initial act of trust is taken voluntarily68, e.g., as is the case with successful business organizations who foster a culture of trust by placing trust in others72–74.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
Self-citationERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.1.166 · Cited by 5,399
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
Langer, E. J. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311 · Cited by 3,909
Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4635.001.0001 · Cited by 3,428
A theory of sequential reciprocity
Dufwenberg, M. A., & Kirchsteiger, G. (2003) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003 · Cited by 1,895
Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments
Levine, D. K. (1998) · Review of Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1006/redy.1998.0023 · Cited by 1,374
Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive ToolboxPreprint
Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,367
Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Reply
Hoffman, E. N., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.1.340 · Cited by 1,146
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001 · Cited by 2,416
“Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., et al. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000142 · Cited by 1,898
Psychological foundations of incentives
Fehr, E., & Falk, A. (2002) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/s0014-2921(01)00208-2 · Cited by 1,240
Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics
Smith, V. L. S. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803322156954 · Cited by 967
Self-citationComputing and applying trust in web-based social networks
Golbeck, J., & Hendler, J. (2005) · University Libraries (University of Maryland) · Cited by 834
The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism - Experimental Evidence and New TheoriesPreprint
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2005) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.726 · Cited by 843
Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation
Henrich, J. (2004) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(03)00094-5 · Cited by 1,096
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006) · Handbook on the economics of giving, reciprocity and altruism · doi:10.1016/s1574-0714(06)01008-6 · Cited by 1,246
Decomposing Trust and Trustworthiness
Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I., & Piankov, N. E. (2006) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9122-4 · Cited by 625
Pride and Prejudice: The Human Side of Incentive Theory
Ellingsen, T., & Johannesson, M. (2008) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.98.3.990 · Cited by 598
Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity: Evidence and Economic Applications
Fehr, E. (2008) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/ccol0521818729.007 · Cited by 506
Betrayal Aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States
Bohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2008) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.98.1.294 · Cited by 481
Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion
Muslim, U. B., & Chowdhury, M. G. (2013) · Cited by 467
Understanding Social Preference with Simple TestsPreprint
Charness, G. B., & Rabin, M. (2000) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.224577 · Cited by 439
Mine and yours: Property rights in dictator games
Oxoby, R. J., & Spraggon, J. M. (2006) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.12.006 · Cited by 404
Kimbrough, E. O., & Vostroknutov, A. (2015) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/jeea.12152 · Cited by 406
Prosocial lies: When deception breeds trust
Levine, E. E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.10.007 · Cited by 384
Religion and trust: An experimental study
Tan, J. H. W., & Vogel, C. (2008) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2008.03.002 · Cited by 342
Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity: Evidence and Economic Applications
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610240.008 · Cited by 348
Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust
Evans, A. M., & Revelle, W. (2008) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.011 · Cited by 336
Punish or perish? Retaliation and collaboration among humans
Sigmund, K. (2007) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.06.012 · Cited by 309
Delton, A. W., Krasnow, M. M., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1102131108 · Cited by 305
Rationality in Economics: Constructivist and Ecological Forms
Smith, V. L. S. (2007) · Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University) · Cited by 283
Self-citationEllingsen, T., Johannesson, M., Tjøtta, S., & Torsvik, G. (2009) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2009.04.021 · Cited by 280
Triangulating the Neural, Psychological, and Economic Bases of Guilt Aversion
Chang, L. J., Smith, A., Dufwenberg, M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.056 · Cited by 260
Lincoln, J. R., & Gerlach, M. L. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511584442 · Cited by 253
Social framing effects: Preferences or beliefs?
Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., Möllerström, J., & Munkhammar, S. (2012) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2012.05.007 · Cited by 260
ON THE NATURE OF RECIPROCAL MOTIVES
Cox, J. C., & DECK, C. A. (2005) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1093/ei/cbi043 · Cited by 245
The Hedonistic Paradox: Is homo economicus happier?
Konow, J., & Earley, J. (2007) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.04.006 · Cited by 245
Intention-Mediated Selective Helping in Infancy
Dunfield, K. A., & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610364119 · Cited by 247
When punishment fails: Research on sanctions, intentions and non-cooperation
Houser, D. E., Xiao, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (2007) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2007.05.001 · Cited by 228
Self-citationAsher, N. M., & Alex Lascarides, Y. (2013) · Semantics and Pragmatics · doi:10.3765/sp.6.2 · Cited by 203
Ermisch, J., Gambetta, D., Laurie, H., Siedler, T., & Uhrig, S. C. N. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2009.00591.x · Cited by 201
Sticks and Carrots: The Effect of Contract Frame on Effort in Incomplete Contracts
Christ, M. H., Sedatole, K. L., & Towry, K. L. (2012) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-50219 · Cited by 188
Do strong family ties inhibit trust?
Ermisch, J., & Gambetta, D. (2010) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.05.007 · Cited by 182
Outcomes versus intentions: On the nature of fair behavior and its development with age
Sutter, M. (2006) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2006.09.001 · Cited by 185
Riedl, R., & Javor, A. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics · doi:10.1037/a0026318 · Cited by 193
Does Religion Promote Trust? The Role of Signaling, Reputation, and Punishment
Sosis, R. H. (2005) · Cited by 174
Social Cognition through the Lens of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience
Arioli, M., Crespi, C., & Canessa, N. (2018) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2018/4283427 · Cited by 215
Ellingsen, T., & Johannesson, M. (2007) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.21.4.135 · Cited by 179
The Psychology (and Economics) of Trust
Evans, A. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2009) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00232.x · Cited by 169
Multiple gossip statements and their effect on reputation and trustworthiness
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H.-J., & Milinski, M. (2008) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0762 · Cited by 158
Trust, communication and contracts: An experiment
Ben‐Ner, A., & Putterman, L. G. (2009) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.01.011 · Cited by 158
Neural signatures of trust in reciprocity: A coordinate‐based meta‐analysis
Bellucci, G., Chernyak, S. V., Goodyear, K., Eickhoff, S. B., & Krueger, F. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23451 · Cited by 160
Desmet, P., David De Cremer, A., & van Dijk, E. (2010) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.006 · Cited by 155
Mood-Driven Behavior in Strategic Interactions
Capra, C. M. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828041301885 · Cited by 149
Trust on the World Wide Web: A Survey
Golbeck, J. (2008) · Foundations and Trends® in Web Science · doi:10.1561/1800000006 · Cited by 142
The Self-Fulfilling Property of Trust: An Experimental Study
Bacharach, M., Guerra, G. A., & Zizzo, D. J. (2007) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-007-9043-5 · Cited by 140
The impact of social value orientation and risk attitudes on trust and reciprocity
Kanagaretnam, K., Mestelman, S., Nainar, S. M. K., & Shehata, M. (2009) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2008.12.003 · Cited by 135
Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity - Evidence and Economic ApplicationsPreprint
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2001) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.255223 · Cited by 135
Split or Steal? Cooperative Behavior When the Stakes Are Large
van den Assem, M. J., van Dolder, D., & Thaler, R. H. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1413 · Cited by 140
Martin, A., & Olson, K. R. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615568998 · Cited by 141
Can a Code of Ethics Improve Manager Behavior and Investor Confidence? An Experimental Study
Davidson, B. I., & Stevens, D. E. (2012) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-50272 · Cited by 128
The strategy method lowers measured trustworthy behavior
Casari, M., & Cason, T. N. (2009) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.012 · Cited by 120
Japan's network economy structure, persistence, and change
Lincoln, J. R., & Gerlach, M. L. (2004) · Cited by 118
Public Goods Provision and Sanctioning in Privileged Groups
Reuben, E., & Riedl, A. M. (2008) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002708322361 · Cited by 115
Expressed preferences and behavior in experimental games
Charness, G. B., & Rabin, M. (2004) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.09.010 · Cited by 113
Indirect reciprocity in cyclical networks
Greiner, B., & Levati, M. V. (2005) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2004.04.003 · Cited by 111
Gift Exchange in a Multi‐Worker Firm
Maximiano, S., Sloof, R., & Joep Sonnemans, A. (2007) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02065.x · Cited by 109
Testing theories of reciprocity: Do motivations matter?
Stanca, L., Bruni, L., & Corazzini, L. (2009) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.009 · Cited by 106
Humanomics: Moral Sentiments and the Wealth of Nations for the Twenty-First Century
Smith, V. L. S., & Wilson, B. J. (2019) · Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University) · Cited by 108
Self-citationWhat You Don't Know Won't Hurt You: A Laboratory Analysis of Betrayal Aversion
Aimone, J. A., & Houser, D. E. (2009) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-012-9314-z · Cited by 105
den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kaptein, M. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9617-8 · Cited by 105
Managing Ingroup and Outgroup Relationships
Kurzban, R., & Neuberg, S. L. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470939376.ch22 · Cited by 101
Tappin, B. M., & Capraro, V. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.06.005 · Cited by 98
Ames, D. R., Weber, E. U., & Zou, X. (2011) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.007 · Cited by 101
Neural correlates of economic game playing
Krüeger, F., Grafman, J. H., & McCabe, K. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0165 · Cited by 101
Self-citationBellucci, G., Feng, C., Camilleri, J. A., Eickhoff, S. B., & Krüeger, F. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.06.024 · Cited by 100
Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215600530 · Cited by 111
Geospatial Information Bottom-Up: A Matter of Trust and Semantics
Bishr, M., & Kühn, W. (2007) · Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72385-1_22 · Cited by 92
Nihonsugi, T., Ihara, A. S., & Haruno, M. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3885-14.2015 · Cited by 93
When equality trumps reciprocity
Xiao, E., & Bicchieri, C. (2010) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2010.02.001 · Cited by 91
The Effect of Initial Endowments in Experimental Auctions
Corrigan, J. R., & Rousu, M. C. (2006) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00870.x · Cited by 87
Rebitzer, J. B., & Taylor, L. J. (2011) · Handbook of labour economics · doi:10.1016/s0169-7218(11)04114-1 · Cited by 105
Social preferences and moral biases
Croson, R. T. A., & Konow, J. (2008) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2008.10.007 · Cited by 86
It's the Thought That Counts: The Role of Intentions in Noisy Repeated Games
Rand, D. G., Drew Fudenberg, B., & Dreber, A. (2013) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.05.013 · Cited by 85
Recordkeeping alters economic history by promoting reciprocity
Basu, S., Dickhaut, J. W., Hecht, G., Towry, K. L., & Waymire, G. B. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0811967106 · Cited by 83
Cooperation over finite horizons: A theory and experiments
Ambrus, A., & Pathak, P. A. (2010) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.016 · Cited by 83
Implications of trust, fear, and reciprocity for modeling economic behavior
Cox, J. C., Sadiraj, K., & Sadiraj, V. (2007) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9156-7 · Cited by 81
Smith, V. L. S. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511754364 · Cited by 83
Self-citationFrom Outcome-Based to Language-Based Preferences
Capraro, V., Halpern, J. Y., & Perc, M. (2024) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20221613 · Cited by 94
Algorithm exploitation: Humans are keen to exploit benevolent AI
Karpus, J., Krüger, A., Verba, J. T., Bahrami, B., & Deroy, O. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102679 · Cited by 76
Wilson, B. J. (2008) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2008.06.001 · Cited by 73
Meeting now suggests we will meet again: Implications for debates on the evolution of cooperation
Krasnow, M. M., Delton, A. W., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep01747 · Cited by 79
Reciprocal Stakeholder Behavior
Hahn, T. (2012) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650312439029 · Cited by 72
Khan, Z., Soundararajan, V., Wood, G., & Ahammad, M. F. (2017) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2017.06.009 · Cited by 89
Trust and reciprocity in incentive contracting
Rigdon, M. L. (2009) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.01.006 · Cited by 68
Self-citationMirror, Mirror on the Wall: Algorithmic Assessments, Transparency, and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies
Bauer, K., & Gill, A. (2023) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2023.1217 · Cited by 79
Trust in ChildrenPreprint
Liday, S. G., Vesterlund, L., Harbaugh, W. T., & Krause, K. (2002) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 64
Monte Carlo Planning Method Estimates Planning Horizons during Interactive Social Exchange
Hula, A., Montague, P. R., & Dayan, P. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004254 · Cited by 63
Choi, J. (2013) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-50641 · Cited by 63
Framing, intentions, and trust–choice incompatibility
Keren, G. B. (2007) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.02.002 · Cited by 60
Moral hazard and peer monitoring in a laboratory microfinance experiment
Cason, T. N., Gangadharan, L., & Maitra, P. (2012) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.02.003 · Cited by 60
Group Reputations, Stereotypes, and Cooperation in a Repeated Labor Market
Healy, P. J. (2007) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.97.5.1751 · Cited by 60
A model of risk and mental state shifts during social interaction
Hula, A., Vilares, I., Lohrenz, T. M., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005935 · Cited by 64
NEUROECONOMICS AND THE ECONOMIC SCIENCES
McCabe, K. (2008) · Economics and Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0266267108002010 · Cited by 55
Self-citationHow history and convention create norms: An experimental study
Guala, F., & Mittone, L. (2010) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2010.05.009 · Cited by 57
Fairness, fast and slow: A review of dual process models of fairness
Hallsson, B. G., Siebner, H. R., & Hulme, O. J. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.02.016 · Cited by 59
The developmental emergence of direct reciprocity and its influence on prosocial behavior
Leimgruber, K. L. (2018) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.006 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- McCabe, K. A., Rigdon, M. L., & Smith, V. L.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rigdon, Mary L.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267-275
- ISSN
- 0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107651934
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 70.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
- Keywords
- positive reciprocity, trust game, intention attribution, bargaining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review