The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Asymmetries in vowel perception
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels
Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1906875 · Cited by 2,837 · cited 1×
“Identification results also show lower confusion rates for the point vowels / i/ and /u/ compared to more central vowels (Peterson and Barney, 1952).”
ResultRosch, E. (1975) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90021-3 · Cited by 1,423
Kuhl, P. K. (1991) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212211 · Cited by 1,331
Iverson, P., & Kuhl, P. K. (1995) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.412280 · Cited by 352
Speech perception in early infancy: Perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel categories
Kuhl, P. K. (1979) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.383639 · Cited by 317 · cited 1×
“This was demonstrated in English infantsÕ discrimination of English /i/ versus / / (Kuhl, 1979; Marean et al., 1992) and / / versus / c / (Kuhl, 1983), two contrasts involving at least one peripheral vowel.”
BackgroundCategorization of speech by infants: Support for speech-sound prototypes.
Grieser, D., & Kuhl, P. K. (1989) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.4.577 · Cited by 184
A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants
Polka, L., & Bohn, O.-S. (1996) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.415884 · Cited by 171 · cited 4×
“/ /–/Y Y / and / / and /ae/ contrasts were selected so that these dimensions had overlapping values and, in the case of / / and /ae/, the naturally present duration contrast was digitally neutralized (Polka and Bohn, 1996; Polka, 1995).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationInternal structure of voicing categories in early infancy
Miller, J. L., & Eimas, P. D. (1996) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03207549 · Cited by 65
Cited by
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2154 · Cited by 886
Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months
Kuhl, P. K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P. (2006) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00468.x · Cited by 867
PRIMIR: a developmental framework of infant speech processing
Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2005.9684216 · Cited by 484
The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r)
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021) · Second Language Speech Learning · doi:10.1017/9781108886901.002 · Cited by 429
Self-citationInfant speech perception bootstraps word learning
Werker, J. F., & Yeung, H. H. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.003 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Polka, L., & Bohn, O.-S.
- Venue
- Speech Communication
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 221-231
- ISSN
- 0167-6393 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098123762
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asymmetries in vowel perception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0167-6393(02)00105-x
- The paper
- Polka, L., & Bohn, O.-S. (2003). Asymmetries in vowel perception. Speech Communication. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6393(02)00105-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
