Cited by 63Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Cross-species interaction and communication: A study method applied to captive siamang (Hylobates syndactylus) and long-billed corella (Cacatua tenuirostris) contacts with humans

Nimon, A.J., Dalziel, F.R.·1992·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0168-1591(05)80013-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nimon, A. J., & Dalziel, F. R.
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-05
Volume
33
Issue
2-3
Pages
261-272
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167551835
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Adelaide
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
interspecies interactions, human-animal communication, zoo animals, siamang, Hylobates syndactylus, captive animal behavior, reinforcement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review