The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The phylogeny of proteobacteria: relationships to other eubacterial phyla and eukaryotes
Open accessAbstract
The evolutionary relationships of proteobacteria, which comprise the largest and phenotypically most diverse division among prokaryotes, are examined based on the analyses of available molecular sequence data. Sequence alignments of different proteins have led to the identification of numerous conserved inserts and deletions (referred to as signature sequences), which either are unique characteristics of various proteobacterial species or are shared by only members from certain subdivisions of proteobacteria. These signature sequences provide molecular means to define the proteobacterial phyla and their various subdivisions and to understand their evolutionary relationships to the other groups of eubacteria as well as the eukaryotes. Based on signature sequences that are present in different proteins it is now possible to infer that the various eubacterial phyla evolved from a common ancestor in the following order: low-G+C Gram-positive-->high-G+C Gram-positive-->Deinococcus-Thermus (green nonsulfur bacteria)-->cyanobacteria-->Spirochetes-->Chlamydia-Cytophaga-Aquifex -green sulfur bacteria-->Proteobacteria-1 (epsilon and delta)-->Proteobacteria-2 (alpha)-->Proteobacteria-3 (beta)-->Proteobacteria-4 (gamma). An unexpected but important aspect of the relationship deduced here is that the main eubacterial phyla are related to each other linearly rather than in a tree-like manner, suggesting that the major evolutionary changes within Bacteria have taken place in a directional manner. The identified signatures permit placement of prokaryotes into different groups/divisions and could be used for determinative purposes. These signatures generally support the origin of mitochondria from an alpha-proteobacterium and provide evidence that the nuclear cytosolic homologs of many genes are also derived from proteobacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence
Cole, S. T., Brosch, R., Parkhill, J., Garnier, T., Churcher, C., Harris, D., Gordon, S. V., Eiglmeier, K., Gas, S., Barry, C. E., et al. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31159 · Cited by 7,847
Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya.
Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., & Wheelis, M. L. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 · Cited by 6,128
The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis.
Kunst, F., Ogasawara, N., Moszer, I., Albertini, A. M., Alloni, G., Azevedo, V., Bertero, M. G., Bessières, P., Bolotin, A., Borchert, S., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36786 · Cited by 3,679
The complete genome sequence of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori
Tomb, J.-F., White, O., Kerlavage, A. R., Clayton, R. A., Sutton, G. G., Fleischmann, R. D., Ketchum, K. A., Klenk, H. P., Gill, S., Dougherty, B. A., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/41483 · Cited by 3,529
The genome sequence of Rickettsia prowazekii and the origin of mitochondria
Andersson, S. G. E., Zomorodipour, A., Andersson, J. O., Sicheritz-Pontén, T., Alsmark, U. C. M., Podowski, R. M., Näslund, A. K., Eriksson, A.-S., Winkler, H. H., & Kurland, C. G. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/24094 · Cited by 1,697
The Hydrogen Hypothesis for the First Eukaryote
Martin, W., & Müller, M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/32096 · Cited by 1,282
Woese, C. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6854 · Cited by 1,053
Iwabe, N., Kuma, K., Hasegawa, M., Osawa, S., & Miyata, T. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.23.9355 · Cited by 902
An ancestral mitochondrial DNA resembling a eubacterial genome in miniature
Lang, B. F., Burger, G., O'Kelly, C. J., Cedergren, R., Golding, G. B., Lemieux, C., Sankoff, D., Turmel, M., & Gray, M. W. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387493a0 · Cited by 620
The Endosymbiont Hypothesis Revisited
Gray, M. W. (1992) · International Review of Cytology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62068-9 · Cited by 586
Cited by
Buell, C. R., Joardar, V., Lindeberg, M., Selengut, J., Paulsen, I. T., Gwinn, M. L., Dodson, R. J., Deboy, R. T., Durkin, A. S., Kolonay, J. F., et al. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1731982100 · Cited by 836
Prokaryotic Heme Biosynthesis: Multiple Pathways to a Common Essential Product
Dailey, H. A., Dailey, T. A., Gerdes, S., Jahn, D., Jahn, M., O'Brian, M. R., & Warren, M. J. (2017) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00048-16 · Cited by 340
Margolin, W. (2009) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.033 · Cited by 262
Did Genetic Drift Drive Increases in Genome Complexity?
Whitney, K. D., & Garland, T. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001080 · Cited by 142
Metagenomic analysis of soil microbial community under PFOA and PFOS stress
Cai, Y., Chen, H., Yuan, R., Wang, F., Chen, Z., & Zhou, B. (2020) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109838 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, R. S.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2000-10-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 367-402
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131596454
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The phylogeny of proteobacteria: relationships to other eubacterial phyla and eukaryotes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00031-0
- The paper
- Gupta, R. S. (2000). The phylogeny of proteobacteria: relationships to other eubacterial phyla and eukaryotes. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00031-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.