Cited by 58Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Long-Term Follow-Up of Narcissistic/Borderline Patients

Open access
Stone, Michael H.·1989·Psychiatric Clinics of North America

Abstract

In a long-term follow-up study of hospitalized border-line patients with narcissistic traits that either fell short of or fulfilled DSM criteria for narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), outcome was similar to outcome in the borderline group as a whole. An exception was encountered in the subgroup of narcissistic borderlines who also showed marked antisocial traits: poor outcome was the rule in this subgroup. In general, borderlines with NPD tended to be male and to be more at risk for suicide than non-NPD borderlines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0193-953x(18)30418-0

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have documented the persistence of narcissistic pathology, even among patients who improve symptomatically.

    “Overall, studies (Table 2) (76–83) have documented the persistence of narcissistic pathology, even among patients who improve symptomatically.”
  • In Stone (1989), a retrospective 20-year study found improvement in narcissistic personality disorder similar to borderline personality disorder, and patients with narcissistic personality disorder plus antisocial personality disorder had worse overall outcome.

    “Stone, 1989 ( 78 ) 13–39 71:29 Retrospective/20 16 Improvement similar to borderline personality disorder; NPD+antisocial personality disorder worse overall outcome”

    From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as Stone, 1989 ( 78 )

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stone, M. H.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Stone, Michael H.
Venue
Psychiatric Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
621-641
ISSN
0193-953X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W61574337
Cited by
58
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Clinics of North America (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
narcissistic personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, narcissistic personality traits, antisocial personality traits, long-term outcomes, suicide risk, hospitalized patients, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Narcissism, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Psychotherapy, Risk Factors, Social Adjustment, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review