Cited by 28Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

PHF and PHF-like fibrils –cause or consequence?

Ihara, Y·2001·Neurobiology of Aging

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00200-1

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ihara, Y.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Ihara, Y
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
123-126
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043618425
Cited by
28
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
tau oligomers, Alzheimer's disease, isoproterenol, radioligand synthesis, reductive alkylation, norepinephrine, positron emission tomography, brain penetration, PET radiotracer
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Exons, Humans, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Mutation, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review