Cited by 43Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Microdialysis without acetylcholinesterase inhibition reveals an age-related attenuation in stimulated cortical acetylcholine release

Herzog, C·2003·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Aging-related differences in the ability of cortical cholinergic inputs to respond to local depolarization was assessed in young (3-6 months) and old (26-33 months) awake rats using in vivo microdialysis in the absence of an inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase. Rats were perfused, using a within-subjects, repeated session design, with vehicle (aCSF) or K(+) (25, 50, 100 mM). Perfusion of K(+) resulted in a dose-dependent increase in cortical ACh efflux with comparable efflux seen between the two ages following 25 mM (50%) and 50 mM (100%) K(+). In contrast, aged rats exhibited a marked attenuation (330%) in ACh efflux relative to young adult rats (650%). These data reveal aging-related decreases in the responsiveness of cortical cholinergic afferents, tested under physiologically relevant conditions, to local depolarization and may provide a neuronal mechanism contributing to the cognitive deficits reported in normal aging- and age-related pathological conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00226-9

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The attribution of the cognitive effects of atropine and scopolamine to blockade of postsynaptic mAChRs must be modified by awareness that these drugs also increase the release of ACh due to presynaptic M2 receptor antagonism.

    “However, the attribution of the cognitive effects to blockade of postsynaptic mAChRs must be modified by awareness that these drugs also increase the release of ACh, due to presynaptic M2 receptor antagonism (e.g., Herzog et al, 2003).”

    From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Herzog et al, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herzog, C.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Herzog, C
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-10
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
861-863
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999299399
Cited by
43
References
15
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag010173-10)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG10 173)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
acetylcholine release, aging, acetylcholinesterase inhibition, microdialysis, age-related cognitive decline, cholinergic neurotransmission, rats
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Acetylcholinesterase, Afferent Pathways, Age Factors, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Cholinergic Fibers, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Neurons, Potassium, Rats, Inbred F344, Prefrontal Cortex, Microdialysis, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review