The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration
Abstract
The management of new service development (NSD) has become an important competitive concern in many service industries. However, NSD remains among the least studied and understood topics in the service management literature. As a result, our current understanding of the critical resources and activities to develop new services is inadequate given NSD’s importance as a service competitiveness driver. Until recently, the generally accepted principle behind NSD was that “new services happen” rather than occurring through formal development processes. Recent efforts to address this debate have been inconclusive. Thus, additional research is needed to validate or discredit the belief that new services happen as a result of intuition, flair, and luck. Relying upon the general distinctions between research exploitation and exploration, this paper describes areas in NSD research that deserve further leveraging and refinement (i.e. exploitation) and identifies areas requiring discovery or new study (i.e. exploration). We discuss the critical substantive and research design issues facing NSD scholars such as defining new services, choice in focusing on the NSD process or performance (or both), and specification of unit of analysis. We also examine what can be exploited from the study of new product development to further understanding of NSD. Finally, we explore one important area for future NSD research exploration: the impact of the Internet on the design and development of services. We offer research opportunities and research challenges in the study of NSD throughout the paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393549 · Cited by 8,357
Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 3,759
Central Problems in the Management of Innovation
Van de Ven, A. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590 · Cited by 3,746
Design Rules: The Power of Modularity
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001 · Cited by 3,504
How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy
Porter, M. E. (1989) · Readings in Strategic Management · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_10 · Cited by 3,267
Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach
Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y.-F. (2000) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.19.1.22.15184 · Cited by 3,189
The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm
Ulrich, K. (1995) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3 · Cited by 2,885
Hauser, J. R. (1988) · Harvard business review · Cited by 2,266
Cited by
Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – a review
Tukker, A. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049 · Cited by 1,961
Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science
Hauser, J., Tellis, G. J., & Griffin, A. (2006) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1050.0144 · Cited by 1,077
Ordanini, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2011) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670510385332 · Cited by 676
Innovation types and innovation management practices in service companies
Oke, A. (2007) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570710750268 · Cited by 502
Creating and capturing value from Big Data: A multiple-case study analysis of provider companies
Urbinati, A., Bogers, M., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2019) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2018.07.004 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Menor, L. J., Tatikonda, M. V., & Sampson, S. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03-19
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-157
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2130022913
- Cited by
- 658
- References
- 98
- FWCI
- 38.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0272-6963(01)00091-2
- The paper
- Menor, L. J., Tatikonda, M. V., & Sampson, S. E. (2002). New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(01)00091-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.