Cited by 334Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpinal Cord Injury ResearchPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catastrophizing is associated with pain intensity, psychological distress, and pain-related disability among individuals with chronic pain after spinal cord injury

Abstract

Little research has examined the role of patient cognitive and behavioral responses, including catastrophizing, in adjustment to chronic pain associated with spinal cord injury (SCI). The objective of this study was to examine the associations of catastrophizing and specific pain coping strategies with pain intensity, psychological distress, and pain-related disability among individuals with chronic pain and SCI, after controlling for important demographic and SCI-related variables that might affect outcomes. Participants in this study were 174 community residents with SCI and chronic pain who completed a mailed questionnaire that included the SF-36 Mental Health scale, Coping Strategies Questionnaire, and Graded Chronic Pain Scale. The pain coping and catastrophizing measures explained an additional 29% of the variance in pain intensity after adjusting for the demographic and SCI variables (P<0.001). The coping and catastrophizing scales accounted for an additional 30% of the variance in psychological distress (P<0.001) and 11% of the variance in pain-related disability (P<0.001), after controlling for pain intensity and demographic and SCI variables. Catastrophizing, but not any other single pain coping strategy, was consistently strongly and independently associated with the outcome measures. Potentially, the assessment and treatment of catastrophizing may reduce psychological distress and pain-related disability among individuals with chronic pain and SCI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00045-3

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 334

Metadata

Authors
Turner, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Warms, C. A., & Cardenas, D. D.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Turner, Judith A.
Venue
Pain
Published
2002-07
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
127-134
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082192971
Cited by
333
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1P01 HD/NS33988)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
catastrophizing, chronic pain, spinal cord injury, pain coping, pain intensity, psychological distress, pain-related disability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Severity of Illness Index, Spinal Cord Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review