Cited by 466Stress Responses and CortisolWorkplace Health and Well-beingAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Differences in cortisol awakening response on work days and weekends in women and men from the Whitehall II cohort

Kunz-Ebrecht, Sabine R, Kirschbaum, Clemens, Marmot, Michael, Steptoe, Andrew·2004·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

It is thought that the salivary cortisol awakening response can serve as a reliable marker of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical activity. Response magnitude might be influenced by stress, but results of studies on work-related stress have been inconclusive. Non-compliance with the sampling schedule is a potential confounding factor that has rarely been controlled. The objective of the study was to determine whether the cortisol awakening response is greater on a work day than on a weekend day, and whether responses vary with gender and socioeconomic position. Compliance was controlled by excluding participants who reported a delay of more than 10 min between waking up and taking the first saliva sample. Data were collected from 196 men and women aged 47 to 59 years drawn from the Whitehall II cohort of British civil servants, with free salivary cortisol sampled immediately after waking up and 30 min later on 2 days. Data on stress, perceived control and happiness over the remainder of the day, and on sleep quality, time of waking, and health behaviour were also obtained. The awakening response was lower in non-compliant participants than in compliant ones, so non-compliant participants were excluded from further analyses. Salivary cortisol levels on waking did not differ by gender or socioeconomic position, or between work and weekend days. However, the cortisol awakening response (defined as the difference between waking and 30 min later) was greater on work than weekend days (mean increases 10.5 and 3.7 nmol/l, P < 0.001). On the work day, women showed larger increases than men (P = 0.011), but there were no gender differences on the weekend day. Across both days, lower socioeconomic position was associated with a larger cortisol awakening response (P = 0.014). Time of waking up was not related to the cortisol awakening response on either day. Participants rated themselves as more stressed, less in control, and less happy over the remainder of the work than weekend day. These results indicate that the cortisol awakening response occurs on both work and non-work days, but that anticipation of the working day is associated with an enhanced response. Cortisol output over the early part of the day may be particularly sensitive to the influence of chronic stress and its anticipation, especially in women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0306-4530(03)00072-6

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women react differently to chronic stress compared to men, displaying larger increases in cortisol levels when chronically stressed.

    “women react differently to chronic stress compared to men, displaying larger increases in cortisol levels when chronically stressed (Kunz-Ebrecht et al., 2004;Schulz et al., 1998;Steptoe et al., 2000).”
  • The cortisol awakening response is increased by work stressors.

    “The cortisol awakening response is a reliable marker of HPA axis activity which has been found to be increased by work stressors (Pruessner et al. 1997; Kunz-Ebrecht et al. 2004) and in individuals at high risk of depression (Mannie et al. 2007).”
  • The cortisol awakening response is a reliable marker of HPA axis activity.

    “The cortisol awakening response is a reliable marker of HPA axis activity which has been found to be increased by work stressors (Pruessner et al. 1997; Kunz-Ebrecht et al. 2004) and in individuals at high risk of depression (Mannie et al. 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kunz-Ebrecht, S. R., Kirschbaum, C., Marmot, M., & Steptoe, A.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Steptoe, Andrew
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
516-528
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147732099
Cited by
466
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 33
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
cortisol awakening response, salivary cortisol, occupational stress, gender differences, socioeconomic position, anticipatory stress, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, sleep quality, perceived control, Whitehall II cohort
MeSH terms
Employment, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Leisure Activities, Male, Middle Aged, Periodicity, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Reference Values, Saliva, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Specimen Handling, Stress, Psychological, Wakefulness, Biomarkers, Selection Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review