Cited by 111Stress Responses and CortisolStress and Burnout ResearchHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Clinical burnout is not reflected in the cortisol awakening response, the day curve or the response to a low-dose dexamethasone suppression test

Mommersteeg, Paula M.C., Heijnen, Cobi J., Verbraak, Marc J.P.M., van Doornen, Lorenz J.P.·2006·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Burnout is presumed to be the result of chronic stress, and chronic stress is known to affect the HPA-axis. To date, studies on HPA-axis functioning in burnout have showed inconsistent results. In the present study, a large sample (n=74) of clinically diagnosed burnout individuals, mostly on sick-leave, were included and compared with 35 healthy controls. Salivary cortisol was sampled on 2 days to determine the cortisol awakening response (CAR) and the day-curve. In addition, the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was applied to assess the feedback efficacy of the HPA-axis. There were no differences observed in the CAR, day-curve or CAR after DST in the burnout group as compared to a healthy control group. Burnout shows overlap in symptoms with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and depression. Therefore, differential changes in HPA-axis functioning that resemble the hypo-functioning of the HPA-axis in CFS, or rather the hyper-functioning of the HPA-axis in depression, might have obscured the findings. However, no effect of fatigue or depressive mood on HPA-axis functioning was found in the burnout group. We concluded that HPA-axis functioning in clinically diagnosed burnout participants as tested in the present study, seems to be normal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.07.003

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mommersteeg, P. M. C., Heijnen, C. J., Verbraak, M. J. P. M., & van Doornen, L. J. P.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • HSK Groep (NL)
Corresponding author
Mommersteeg, Paula M.C.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
216-225
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097041359
Cited by
111
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
burnout, cortisol awakening response, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, dexamethasone suppression test, chronic stress, salivary cortisol, chronic fatigue syndrome, depression, fatigue, sick leave
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Burnout, Professional, Circadian Rhythm, Dexamethasone, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Male, Middle Aged, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Reference Values, Saliva, Wakefulness, Chi-Square Distribution, Statistics, Nonparametric, Area Under Curve, Feedback, Physiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review