Cited by 94Vestibular and auditory disordersVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Relationship between postural control and motion sickness in healthy subjects

Owen, Natalie, Leadbetter, Antony Graham, Yardley, Lucy·1998·Brain Research Bulletin

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between reported susceptibility to motion sickness, anxious personality and postural control. Postural stability was assessed in 34 healthy subjects standing with eyes open, eyes closed and viewing a disorienting virtual reality display. These measures were repeated with vibration of the calf muscles to distort the somatosensory feedback from the legs. Susceptibility to motion sickness and anxious personality were evaluated by questionnaire. Greater postural instability was correlated with susceptibility to motion sickness. Motion sickness susceptibility correlated most strongly with increased sway when the visual and somatosensory feedback was absent or distorted. Anxiety was correlated with reported susceptibility to motion sickness but not with postural stability. These findings suggest that deficient perceptual-motor responses to disorienting conditions may contribute to motion sickness susceptibility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0361-9230(98)00101-4

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of the relationship between postural instability and onset of motion sickness show little support for the ecological theory of motion sickness.

    “Studies of the relationship between postural instability and onset of motion sickness also show little support for the ecological theory of motion sickness (Owen et al. 1998; Warwick-Evans and Beaumont 1991; Warwick-Evans et al. 1998).”

    From Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting (2014) · cites this paper as Owen et al. 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Owen, N., Leadbetter, A. G., & Yardley, L.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of East London (GB)
Corresponding author
Yardley, Lucy
Venue
Brain Research Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-11
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
471-474
ISSN
0361-9230 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072942229
Cited by
94
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
motion sickness susceptibility, postural control, postural stability, somatosensory feedback, visual-vestibular interaction, postural sway
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Disease Susceptibility, Feedback, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motion Sickness, Posture, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review