Cited by 87Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionVestibular and auditory disordersVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Stance Width Influences Postural Stability and Motion Sickness

Stoffregen, Thomas A., Yoshida, Ken, Villard, Sebastien, Scibora, Lesley, Bardy, Benoît G.·2010·Ecological Psychology

Abstract

We examined the influence of stance width (the distance between the feet) on postural sway and visually induced motion sickness. Stance width influences the magnitude of body sway, and changes in sway precede the subjective symptoms of motion sickness. Thus, manipulation of stance width may influence motion sickness incidence. Participants (healthy young adults) were exposed to complex, low-frequency oscillation of a moving room. Participants stood with their feet 5 cm, 17 cm, or 30 cm apart. During exposure to visual motion, the widest stance (30 cm) was associated with reduced incidence of motion sickness. For all stance widths, motion sickness was preceded by significant changes in motion of the head and torso. The results support the postural instability theory of motion sickness and suggest practical implications for the prevention of motion sickness. Adoption of wider stance may decrease the risk of motion sickness in operational situations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10407413.2010.496645

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conditions in which postural instability precedes motion sickness are likely conditions in which postural hypotension is being elicited, producing symptoms such as can't see straight, feeling dizzy, hard to focus, everything is gray, and occasionally nausea.

    “It is likely that the conditions in which postural instability precedes “motion sickness” are actually conditions in which postural hypotension is being elicited, hence symptoms such as “can’t see straight, feeling dizzy,” “hard to focus, everything is gray,” and occasionally nausea (Smart et al. 1998, 2002; Stoffregen et al. 2010; Villard et al. 2008).”

    From Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting (2014) · cites this paper as Stoffregen et al. 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stoffregen, T. A., Yoshida, K., Villard, S., Scibora, L., & Bardy, B. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Université Montpellier 1 (FR)
Venue
Ecological Psychology
Published
2010-07-28
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
169-191
ISSN
  • 1040-7413 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6969
OpenAlex
W2014430616
Cited by
87
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • UST Research Online (University of St. Thomas - Minnesota) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
stance width, postural stability, postural sway, visually induced motion sickness, motion sickness prevention, visual motion, low-frequency oscillations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review