Cited by 333Vestibular and auditory disordersVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsNausea and vomiting management

Postural instability precedes motion sickness

Stoffregen, Thomas A, Smart, L.James·1998·Brain Research Bulletin

Abstract

We evaluated the hypothesis that postural instability precedes the onset of motion sickness. Subjects standing in a "moving room" were exposed to nearly global oscillating optical flow. In the experimental condition, the optical oscillations were a complex sum-of-sines between 0.1 and 0.3 Hz, with an excursion of 1.8 cm. This optical motion was of such low frequency and magnitude that it was sometimes not noticed by subjects. However, in two experiments, exposure to the moving room produced significant increases in scores on a standard motion sickness questionnaire. In addition, approximately half of subjects reported motion sickness. Analysis of postural motion during exposure to the moving room revealed increases in postural sway before the onset of subjective motion sickness symptoms. This confirms a key prediction of the postural instability theory of motion sickness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0361-9230(98)00102-6

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As postural instability increases, motion sickness will develop.

    “The concept is that as postural instability increases, motion sickness will develop (Smart et al. 1998; Stoffregen and Smart 1998).”

    From Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting (2014) · cites this paper as Stoffregen and Smart 1998

  • The occurrence of VIMS is tightly linked to the occurrence of vection, in the sense that VIMS does not seem to occur in participants who do not perceive vection.

    “These and other results (e.g., Lee et al., 1997; Stoffregen and Smart, 1998; Classen et al., 2011) indicate that the occurrence of VIMS is tightly linked to the occurrence of vection, in the sense that VIMS does not seem to occur in participants who do not perceive vection.”

    From Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? (2015) · cites this paper as Stoffregen and Smart, 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stoffregen, T. A., & Smart, L. J.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Stoffregen, Thomas A
Venue
Brain Research Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-11
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
437-448
ISSN
0361-9230 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004885620
Cited by
333
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
Keywords
motion sickness, postural instability, postural sway, optical flow, visual motion perception, vestibular perception
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adolescent, Adult, Electric Stimulation, Female, Humans, Male, Motion Sickness, Posture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review