The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enterprise resource planning: Managing the implementation process
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Enterprise resource planning: ERP adoption by European midsize companies
van Everdingen, Y., van Hillegersberg, J., & Waarts, E. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/332051.332064 · Cited by 322 · cited 1×
“More recently, several academically oriented papers have dealt with various aspects of ERP (Davenport, 1998; McAfee, 1999; Stratman and Roth, 1999; Van Everdingen et al., 2000; Mabert et al., 2000, 2001).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Davenport, 1998, Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system, Harvard Business Review, 76, 121
- Deutsch, 1998, Software that can make a grown company cry, The New York Times, CXLVIII, 1
- Fuerst, 1983, Factors affecting the perceived utilization of computer-based decision support systems in the oil industry, Decision Sciences, 13, 554, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1982.tb01182.x · DOI · Paper page
- Ginzberg, 1981, Early diagnosis of MIS implementation failure: Promising results and unanswered questions, Management Science, 27, 459, 10.1287/mnsc.27.4.459 · DOI · Paper page
- Green, 1977, On the analysis of quantitative data in marketing research, Journal of Marketing Science, 14, 52
- Kirkpatrick, 1998, The e-ware war: Competition comes to enterprise software, Fortune, 138, 103
- Mabert, 2000, Enterprise resource planning survey of US manufacturing firms, Production and Inventory Management Journal, 41, 52
- Mabert, 2001, Enterprise resource planning: Common myths versus evolving reality, Business Horizons, 44, 69, 10.1016/S0007-6813(01)80037-9 · DOI · Paper page
- McAfee, A., 1999. The impact of enterprise information technology adoption on operational performance: An empirical investigation, Harvard Business School, Cambridge Working Paper
- McFarlan, 1981, Portfolio approach to information systems, Harvard Business Review, 59, 142
- Nelson, 1999, Hershey’s biggest Dud has turned out to be new computer system, The Wall Street Journal, CIV, A1
- Piturro, 1999, How midsize companies are buying ERP, Journal of Accountancy, 188, 41
- Robey, 1996, Transforming work through information technology: A comparative case study of geographic information systems in county government, Information Systems Research, 7, 93, 10.1287/isre.7.1.93 · DOI · Paper page
- Robinson, 1998, Designing distribution systems to support vendor strategies in supply chain management, Decision Sciences, 29, 685, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb01359.x · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb01359.x
- Sanders, 1985, A field study of organizational factors influencing DSS success, MIS Quarterly, 9, 77, 10.2307/249275 · DOI · Paper page
- Schroeder, 1981, A study of MRP benefits and costs, Journal of Operations Management, 2, 1, 10.1016/0272-6963(81)90031-0 · doi:10.1016/0272-6963(81)90031-0
- Schultz, 1984, The implementation of forecasting models, Journal of Forecasting, 3, 43, 10.1002/for.3980030106 · doi:10.1002/for.3980030106
- Trunk, 1999, Building bridges between WMS & ERP, Journal of Transportation and Distribution, 40, 6
- White, 1982, A study of the MRP implementation process, Journal of Operations Management, 2, 145, 10.1016/0272-6963(82)90002-X · DOI
- White, 1999, JIT manufacturing: A survey of implementations in small and large US manufacturers, Management Science, 45, 1, 10.1287/mnsc.45.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Yusuf, 1998, An empirical investigation of enterprise-wide integration of MRPII, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 18, 66, 10.1108/01443579810192916 · DOI
- Zuckerman, 1999, ERP: Pathway to the future or yesterday’s buzz?, Journal of Transportation and Distribution, 40, 37
Cited by
A Review of ERP Research: A Future Agenda for Accounting Information Systems
Grabski, S. V., Leech, S. A., & Schmidt, P. J. (2011) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/jis.2011.25.1.37 · Cited by 408
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): a review of the literature
Moon, Y. B. (2007) · International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1504/ijmed.2007.012679 · Cited by 328
A multi-project model of key factors affecting organizational benefits from enterprise systems
(2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017458.2017464 · Cited by 259
A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems1
Seddon, P. B., Calvert, C., & Yang, S. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721429 · Cited by 211
Yang, C., & Su, Y. (2009) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/17410390910999602 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Mabert, V. A., Soni, A., & Venkataramanan, M. A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 302-314
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064302998
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enterprise resource planning: Managing the implementation process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00551-9
- The paper
- Mabert, V. A., Soni, A., & Venkataramanan, M. A. (2003). Enterprise resource planning: Managing the implementation process. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00551-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
