Cited by 63Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Long-term cardiac monitoring in older adults with unexplained falls and syncope

Open access
Bhangu, Jaspreet, McMahon, C Geraldine, Hall, Patricia, Bennett, Kathleen, Rice, Ciara, Crean, Peter, Sutton, Richard, Kenny, Rose-Anne·2016·Heart

Abstract

AIMS: Unexplained falls account for 20% of falls in older cohorts. The role of the implantable loop recorder (ILR) in the detection of arrhythmias in patients with unexplained falls is unknown. We aimed to examine the diagnostic utility of the ILR in detection of arrhythmogenic causes of unexplained falls in older patients. METHODS: A single centre, prospective, observational cohort study of recurrent fallers over the age of 50 years with two or more unexplained falls presenting to an emergency department. Insertion of an ILR (Reveal, Medtronic, Minnesota, USA) was used to detect arrhythmia. The primary outcome was detection of cardiac arrhythmia associated with a fall or syncope. The secondary outcome was detection of cardiac arrhythmia independent of falls or syncope, and falls or syncope without associated arrhythmia. RESULTS: Seventy patients, mean age 70 years (51-85 years) received an ILR. In 70% of patients cardiac arrhythmias were detected at a mean time of 47.3 days (SD 48.25). In 20%, falls were attributable to a modifiable cardiac arrhythmia; 10 (14%) received a cardiac pacemaker, 4 (6%) had treatment for supraventricular tachycardia. Patients who had a cardiac arrhythmia detected were more likely to experience a further fall. CONCLUSIONS: 14 (20%) patients demonstrated an arrhythmia which was attributable as the cause of their fall. Patients who have cardiac arrhythmia are significantly more likely to experience future falls. Further research is important to investigate if early detection of arrhythmogenic causes of falls using the ILR prevents future falls in older patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308706

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with unexplained falls, an attack could have been documented by ILR in 70% of patients, with an arrhythmic cause being responsible in 14%.

    “Patients with unexplained falls: in pooled data, an attack could have been documented by ILR in 70% of patients, with an arrhythmic cause being responsible in 14% 191-194”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [194]

    The Arrhythmia and Discussion sections report ILR-detected arrhythmias in about 70% of this single-centre cohort, but that figure refers to arrhythmia detection, not documented fall attacks. The Discussion attributes falls to a modifiable arrhythmia in 20% of patients, not 14%; the Abstract uses 14% for patients who received a pacemaker. This paper alone also does not establish the citing sentence’s pooled-data estimate. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bhangu J, et al. Heart 2016;102:681-686. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308706 Arrhythmias and sudden death on August 20, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://heart.bmj.com/ Heart: first published as 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308706 on 28 January 2016. Downloaded from REFERENCES

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhangu, J., McMahon, C. G., Hall, P., Bennett, K., Rice, C., Crean, P., Sutton, R., & Kenny, R.-A.
Affiliations
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • St. James's Hospital (IE)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Bhangu, Jaspreet
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-01-28
Volume
102
Issue
9
Pages
681-686
ISSN
  • 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-201X
OpenAlex
W2306270171
Cited by
63
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8
FWCI
13.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heart (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
unexplained falls, syncope, implantable loop recorder, cardiac arrhythmias, older adults, recurrent falls, fall prevention, supraventricular tachycardia, cardiac pacemaker
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Electrodes, Implanted, Female, Humans, Long-Term Care, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Syncope, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review