Cited by 301Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Electrical Remodeling of the Human Atrium: Similar Effects in Patients With Chronic Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter

Open access
Franz, Michael R, Karasik, Pamela L, Li, Cuilan, Moubarak, Jean, Chavez, Mary·1997·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter in patients lead to electrical remodeling of the human atrial myocardium, manifested by an abnormal relation between atrial cycle length and action potential duration (APD). BACKGROUND: Experimental studies in goats and isolated human atrial tissue have shown that prolonged AF leads to persistent shortening of atrial refractoriness, a phenomenon referred to as electrical remodeling and which helps to explain why AF begets AF. Direct data on human in situ myocardium are still lacking. METHODS: Using monophasic action potential recordings at two right atrial sites simultaneously, we determined in 7 patients with chronic AF and 13 with chronic atrial flutter (3 weeks to 3 years in duration) the relation between paced cycle length and APD at 90% repolarization (APD90) 15 to 30 min after conversion to sinus rhythm. APD90 was measured during regularly paced cycle lengths (250 to 800 ms) to determine the steady state cycle length relation and during extrastimulus intervals (from 800 ms to refractoriness) at a basic cycle length of 600 ms to determine electrical restitution curves. The same pacing protocols and measurements were performed in nine control patients with sinus rhythm and no overt atrial disease. RESULTS: In control patients, steady state APD90 increased steadily with increases in cycle length from 250 to 800 ms, reaching a maximal value of 325 +/- 41 ms (mean +/- SD) at a cycle length of 800 ms. In patients with cardioversion from atrial flutter or AF, the steady state cycle length-APD90 relation was shifted downward and flattened at cycle lengths >400 ms, reaching only 219 +/- 44 and 245 +/- 39 ms, respectively, at the 800-ms cycle length (p < 0.005 vs. control). The early time course of electrical restitution (200- to 300-ms extrastimulus intervals) was similar between all three groups, but at extrastimulus intervals >350 ms, APD90 was shorter in both the AF and atrial flutter groups than in the control group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between patients with cardioversion from atrial flutter and those with cardioversion from AF. APD90 at a steady state cycle length of 600 ms showed no significant correlation with the duration of previous AF or atrial flutter. CONCLUSIONS: AF and atrial flutter lead to marked, quantitatively similar decreases in the right atrial APD during steady state pacing and extrastimulation a considerable time after cardioversion. These data confirm that both AF and atrial flutter lead to electrical remodeling in the human atrium, with a preponderance at longer cycle lengths. It may be prudent to abort both types of arrhythmias early to prevent electrical remodeling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00385-9

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franz, M. R., Karasik, P. L., Li, C., Moubarak, J., & Chavez, M.
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Franz, Michael R
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-12
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
1785-1792
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1531679198
Cited by
301
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
electrical remodeling, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, action potential duration, electrical restitution, atrial refractoriness, monophasic action potential, cardioversion, right atrium, arrhythmogenic substrate, atrial electrophysiology, sinus rhythm, atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, atrial fibrosis
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Electric Countershock, Heart Conduction System, Humans, Male, Refractory Period, Electrophysiological, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Atrial Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review