Cited by 168Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function to determine aortic pressure augmentation in subjects with treated hypertension

Open access
Cameron, James D., McGrath, Barry P., Dart, Anthony M.·1998·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The purposes of this study were to investigate the use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function for the assessment of central aortic pressure augmentation in subjects taking commonly used antihypertensive agents (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenergic blockers, Ca2+ antagonists, diuretic therapy).Background Applanation tonometry of the radial artery with a generalized transfer function has been proposed as a means of assessing central aortic blood pressure. Recently, a commercial apparatus based on this technique has become available; we therefore examined the effect of a generalized transfer function on derived central aortic pressure compared with measured brachial blood pressures and also investigated the potential of this technique to assess the influence of differing drug therapy.Methods Two hundred and sixty-two hypertensive patients on stable medication were studied using the PWV Medical Blood Pressure Analysis System (version 2, DAT-1).Results In univariate analysis, augmentation index showed association with age, sex, height and heart rate. In multivariate analysis, diastolic blood pressure and age (positively), height and heart rate (negatively) and sex were significantly associated. After adjustment for these variables, pressure augmentation was not associated with any antihypertensive treatment investigated. Linear relationships were demonstrated between brachial blood pressures and corresponding central pressures derived by transfer function methods.Conclusions Our findings suggest that if adjustment for central-peripheral pressure difference is necessary, simple linear relationships may be sufficient. Age, heart rate and height but not the class of antihypertensive medication affected the degree of pressure augmentation observed using this technique.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00411-2

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Marcus RH, Korcarz C, McCray G, et al. Noninvasive method for determi- nation of arterial compliance using Doppler echocardiography and subcla- vian pulse tracings. Circulation 1994;89:2688 -99.
  2. Bendat JS, Piersol AG. Random Data, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1986.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cameron, J. D., McGrath, B. P., & Dart, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
  • Monash Medical Centre (AU)
Corresponding author
Cameron, James D.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-11
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
1214-1220
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050727720
Cited by
168
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
generalized transfer function, central blood pressure, augmentation index, treated hypertension, antihypertensive drugs, brachial blood pressure, pulse wave velocity
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Aorta, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Calcium Channel Blockers, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diuretics, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Radial Artery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review