The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The development of epistemological understanding
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wimmer, H. (1983) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5 · Cited by 6,305
Cited by
Toward a design theory of problem solving
Jonassen, D. H. (2000) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02300500 · Cited by 2,114
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8 · Cited by 1,529
The Development of Argument Skills
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00605 · Cited by 595
Self-citationEpistemological Understanding as a Metacognitive Process: Thinking Aloud During Online Searching
Hofer, B. K. (2004) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5 · Cited by 573
Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J.-F. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538647 · Cited by 346
Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458 · Cited by 338
Student thought and classroom language: examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching
Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.775898 · Cited by 289
Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell‐Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2013) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21073 · Cited by 268
Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence
Bearman, M., Tai, J., Dawson, P., Boud, D., & Ajjawi, R. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2335321 · Cited by 312
“This is consonant with what Kuhn, Cheney, and Weinstock (2000) call an ‘evaluativist epistemology’ where knowing is neither entirely absolute nor entirely relativist but requires people to make alignments between internal perspectives and evidence from the surrounding world.”
Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.863265 · Cited by 169
A meta-analytic review of the relationship between epistemic cognition and academic achievement.
Greene, J. A., Cartiff, B. M., & Duke, R. F. (2018) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000263 · Cited by 150
Sandoval, W. A., Greene, J. A., & Bråten, I. (2016) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x16669319 · Cited by 143
Quality Talk: Developing Students’ Discourse to Promote High-level Comprehension
Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A., Firetto, C. M., Hendrick, B. D., Li, M., Montalbano, C., & Wei, L. (2018) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831218771303 · Cited by 130
The effects of online peer feedback and epistemic beliefs on students’ argumentation-based learning
Noroozi, O., & Hatami, J. (2019) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2018.1431143 · Cited by 96
On Consumer Beliefs about Quality and Taste
Spiller, S. A., & Belogolova, L. (2016) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucw065 · Cited by 95
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2011) · The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511977244.040 · Cited by 77
From Theory of Mind to Epistemic Cognition. A Lifespan perspective
Iordanou, K. (2016) · Frontline Learning Research · doi:10.14786/flr.v4i5.252 · Cited by 38
Bridging the gap between theory of mind and moral reasoning
Astington, J. W. (2004) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1002/cd.98 · Cited by 36
Enhancing evidence-based argumentation in a Mainland China middle school
Shi, Y. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101809 · Cited by 35
Luo, J. (., & Dawson, P. (2026) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2025.2552825 · Cited by 17
Pillow, B. H., Pearson, R. M., Hecht, M., & Bremer, A. (2010) · The Journal of Genetic Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221320903300403 · Cited by 13
Melanou, C., & Beege, M. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16040651 · Cited by 12
Dialogic teaching of controversial issues: discursive moves to enact two-sided discussions
Shi, Y., Zhang, Z., Cao, S., & Liu, Q. (2024) · Language and Education · doi:10.1080/09500782.2023.2240292 · Cited by 11
Developing prospective science teachers’ multivariable thinking capabilities
Rind, I. A. (2022) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101168 · Cited by 10
Dialogic Teaching and Translanguaging in Deaf Education
Swanwick, R. (2018) · Evidence-Based Practices in Deaf Education · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190880545.003.0004 · Cited by 4
Generative AI and Learning Dynamics in Higher Education: A Longitudinal Empirical Study
Melanou, C., Beege, M., & Kimmig, M. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70322 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M.
- Venue
- Cognitive Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 309-328
- ISSN
- 0885-2014 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160715461
- Cited by
- 776
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
