Cited by 84Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumSchizophrenia research and treatmentBirth, Development, and Health

Psychotic illness after prenatal exposure to the 1953 Dutch Flood Disaster

Selten, Jean-Paul, van der Graaf, Yolanda, van Duursen, Rozemarijn, Gispen-de Wied, Christien C, Kahn, René S·1999·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that maternal stress during pregnancy increases the risk of non-affective psychosis for the child. The concept of non-affective psychosis includes the ICD categories schizophrenic disorder, paranoid state and other non-organic psychosis. Data from the Dutch Psychiatric Registry were examined for an effect of the Flood Disaster of 1 February 1953. On this day, a gale caused a flood in the South-west of The Netherlands and 1835 people perished. Our study concerned the 19 villages where mortality exceeded 0.25%. The risk of non-affective psychosis for the cohort born in the period February-October 1953 was compared to the risks for the cohorts born in the corresponding periods of the previous and subsequent 2 years. The relative risk of non-affective psychosis for those exposed during gestation was 1.8 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.9-3.5]. Thus, our study failed to demonstrate a significant association between prenatal exposure to maternal stress and risk of non-affective psychosis. The possible explanations for this finding are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0920-9964(98)00143-1

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maternal exposure to natural disasters, war, or stressful life events is associated with increased prevalence of psychopathology in offspring.

    “and maternal exposure to natural disasters, war or stressful life events have been associated with increased prevalence of psychopathology in the offspring (van Os & Selten, 1998; Selten et al., 1999; Watson et al., 1999; Beversdorf et al., 2005; Khashan et al., 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Selten, J.-P., van der Graaf, Y., van Duursen, R., Gispen-de Wied, C. C., & Kahn, R. S.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Selten, Jean-Paul
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-02
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
243-245
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080949425
Cited by
84
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
prenatal stress, maternal stress
MeSH terms
Disasters, Female, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Psychotic Disorders, Registries, Schizophrenia, Stress, Psychological, Cohort Studies, Maternal Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review