CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 162Origins and Evolution of LifeRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsProtist diversity and phylogeny

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The nature of the last universal common ancestor

Penny, David, Poole, Anthony·1999·Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
DOI 10.1016/s0959-437x(99)00020-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Cytologically, prokaryotes appear simpler and thus evolutionarily 'older' than eukaryotes. In terms of RNA processing, however, prokaryotes are sophisticated and eukaryotes, which retain many features of an RNA-world, appear primitive. The last universal common ancestor may have been mesophilic and could have had many features of the eukaryote genome, but its cytology is unknown.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0959-437x(99)00020-9

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Poole, 1999, Early evolution: prokaryotes, the new kids on the block, Bioessays, 21, 880, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199910)21:10<880::AID-BIES11>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
  2. Koonin, 1996, Non-orthologous gene replacement, Trends Genet, 12, 334, 10.1016/0168-9525(96)20010-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 162

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Penny, D., & Poole, A.
Affiliations
  • Massey University (NZ)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Penny, David
  • Poole, Anthony
ORCID
Poole, Anthony
Venue
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-12
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
672-677
ISSN
0959-437X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0959-437x(99)00020-9
OpenAlex
W1963854145
Cited by
162
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Genetics & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Protist diversity and phylogeny
Keywords
last universal common ancestor, prokaryotes, eukaryotes, RNA processing, RNA world, eukaryotic genome evolution, eukaryotic origin
MeSH terms
Animals, Eukaryotic Cells, Genes, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Prokaryotic Cells, RNA, Selection, Genetic, Temperature, Genome, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review