Cited by 401Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brainstem, cerebellar and limbic neuroanatomical abnormalities in autism

Courchesne, Eric·1997·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Recent autopsy and/or quantitative magnetic resonance imaging studies of autistic patients have identified agenesis of the superior olive, dysgenesis of the facial nucleus, reduced numbers of Purkinje neurons, hypoplasia of the brainstem and posterior cerebellum, and increased neuron-packing density of the medial, cortical and central nuclei of the amygdala and the medial septum. As neurogenesis occurs for these different neuron types during approximately the fifth week of gestation, the possibility is raised that this may be a 'window of vulnerability' for autism; the likely etiologic heterogeneity of autism suggests that other windows of vulnerability are also possible.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0959-4388(97)80016-5

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fehlow, 1993, Autismus infantum und exzessive aerophagie mit symptomatischem megakolon und ileus bei einem fall von ehlers-danlos-syndrom, Pediatr Grenzgeb, 31, 259
  2. Courchesne, 1995, Infantile autism. Part 2: A new neurodevelopmental model, Int Pediatr, 10, 155
  3. Courchesne, 1995, Infantile autism. Part 1: MR imaging abnormalities and their neurobehavioral correlates, Int Pediatr, 10, 141

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 401

Metadata

Authors
Courchesne, E.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Courchesne, Eric
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-04
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
269-278
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165792108
Cited by
401
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 20
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH036840, 1-RO1-MH36840)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS019855, 2-RO1-NS-19855)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, brainstem, cerebellum, limbic system, Purkinje cells, brainstem hypoplasia, amygdala, medial septum, neurogenesis, developmental vulnerability, autism etiology
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Brain Stem, Cerebellum, Humans, Limbic System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review