The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT: Self-regulation is analyzed in terms of self-determination theory using the concepts of intrinsic motivation and the internalization of extrinsic motivation. Laboratory experiments and field studies are reviewed indicating that: (1) intrinsic motivation and fully internalized extrinsic motivation are posi-tively associated with high quality learning and personal adjustment; and (2) maintaining intrinsic motivation and internalizing extrinsic motivation are facili-tated by social contexts that allow satisfaction of the basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Such contexts are ones that are charac-terized by the provision of choice, optimal challenge, informational feedback, interpersonal involvement, and acknowledgment of feelings. Our analysis of self-regulation places individuals ’ experiences at its core. For an action to be considered fully self-regulated, people must experience a sense of volition-a sense of unpressured willingness to engage in the action. When behaviors are truly self-regulated, people do them with full and unconflicted endorsement. Think of a tenth-grade girl who is genuinely eager to become a veterinarian. She spends the weekend before her biology exam quite willingly studying because it is personally important for her to learn the material and do well in the course. Her experience is one of wanting to study biology-of valuing the activity-so she is wholly engaged with the task. In contrast, imagine her classmate who, on that same weekend, sits in front of her open biology text primarily because she feels pressure from her parents to do so. Unlike the first student, she is not volitional in her studying. She does not want to study so she is resentful and half-hearted in doing it. Her eyes skim the pages, but she takes in little of what is on them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.
White, R. W. (1959) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0040934 · Cited by 5,681
Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation.
Deci, E. L. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0030644 · Cited by 4,170
Self-citationAchievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance.
Nicholls, J. G. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.91.3.328 · Cited by 4,161
Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749 · Cited by 3,311
Self-citationFurther Examining the American Dream: Differential Correlates of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Goals
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167296223006 · Cited by 2,745
Self-citationControl and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory.
Ryan, R. M. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450 · Cited by 2,721
Self-citationLepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0035519 · Cited by 2,559
Psychological Needs and the Facilitation of Integrative Processes
Ryan, R. M. (1995) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00501.x · Cited by 2,245
Self-citationHarlow, H. F. (1958) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0047884 · Cited by 2,022 · cited 2×
“Harlow (1958) has argued that individuals need to experience love and interpersonal contact to develop optimally, thus implying that there is an innate”
Background
Cited by
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246 · Cited by 1,762
Self-citationAssor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709902158883 · Cited by 1,109
RYAN, R. M., KUHL, J., & DECI, E. L. (1997) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579497001405 · Cited by 622
Self-citationAssor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.008 · Cited by 611
Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.08.004 · Cited by 544
Metadata
- Authors
- Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Williams, G. C.
- Venue
- Learning and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 165-183
- ISSN
- 1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067121515
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1041-6080(96)90013-8
- The paper
- Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Williams, G. C. (1996). Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learning and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1041-6080(96)90013-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.