Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 629

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning

Open access
Deci, Edward L., Ryan, Richard M., Williams, Geoffrey C.·1996·Learning and Individual Differences

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Self-regulation is analyzed in terms of self-determination theory using the concepts of intrinsic motivation and the internalization of extrinsic motivation. Laboratory experiments and field studies are reviewed indicating that: (1) intrinsic motivation and fully internalized extrinsic motivation are posi-tively associated with high quality learning and personal adjustment; and (2) maintaining intrinsic motivation and internalizing extrinsic motivation are facili-tated by social contexts that allow satisfaction of the basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Such contexts are ones that are charac-terized by the provision of choice, optimal challenge, informational feedback, interpersonal involvement, and acknowledgment of feelings. Our analysis of self-regulation places individuals ’ experiences at its core. For an action to be considered fully self-regulated, people must experience a sense of volition-a sense of unpressured willingness to engage in the action. When behaviors are truly self-regulated, people do them with full and unconflicted endorsement. Think of a tenth-grade girl who is genuinely eager to become a veterinarian. She spends the weekend before her biology exam quite willingly studying because it is personally important for her to learn the material and do well in the course. Her experience is one of wanting to study biology-of valuing the activity-so she is wholly engaged with the task. In contrast, imagine her classmate who, on that same weekend, sits in front of her open biology text primarily because she feels pressure from her parents to do so. Unlike the first student, she is not volitional in her studying. She does not want to study so she is resentful and half-hearted in doing it. Her eyes skim the pages, but she takes in little of what is on them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1041-6080(96)90013-8

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Williams, G. C.
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
165-183
ISSN
1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067121515
Cited by
629
References
16
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1041-6080(96)90013-8
The paper
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Williams, G. C. (1996). Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learning and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1041-6080(96)90013-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.