Cited by 525EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackWriting and Handwriting Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing

Paulus, Trena M.·1999·Journal of Second Language Writing

DOI 10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes
Truscott, J. (1996) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x · Cited by 1,874
Learner Strategies in Language Learning
Ehrman, M. E., Wenden, A. L., & Rubin, J. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328531 · Cited by 1,533
Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications
Silva, T. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587400 · Cited by 860
Responding to Student Writing
Zamel, V. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586773 · Cited by 763 · cited 1×
“ness in both the Ll (Hillocks, 1986; Sommers, 1982) and the L2 contexts (Semke, 1984; Zamel, 1985), blaming either the vague, “rubber-stamp” quality of the comments or the reliance on error correction as the primary feedback type (Semke, 1984; Truscott, 1996) that has resulted in negative student attitudes toward and…”
Background
The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies
Zamel, V. (1983) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586647 · Cited by 712
Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching
Witte, S. P., Larson, R. L., & Hillocks, G. (1987) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357721 · Cited by 694
Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom.
Kroll, B. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · Cited by 656
Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms*
Ferris, D. (1995) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587804 · Cited by 630
An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second‐Language Writing Skills
Kepner, C. G. (1991) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05359.x · Cited by 627
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

Cohen, 1994, Verbal reports on learning strategies, TESOL Quarterly, 28, 678
Hedgcock, 1994, Feedback on feedback: assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141, 10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4 · DOI · Paper page
Mittan, 1989, The peer review process: harnessing students' communicative power, 207

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 525

A Study on Perceptions of Feedback between Students and Teachers in English Writing Course
은호윤 (2015) · Studies in English Language & Literature · doi:10.21559/aellk.2015.41.3.010 · Cited by 1
Designing an Online Learning and Peer Feedback Platform for GRE Writing Test Preparation
Wang, S. H. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32865-2_17 · Cited by 1
The Modern Language Classroom: Individuality, Technology, and Context
Sims, E. (2021) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · doi:10.26076/5bbd-2eb6 · Cited by 1
Study on the Limited Roles of Peer Feedback*
Zhou, D. (2019) · International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Intercultural Communication (ICELAIC) · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.191217.075 · Cited by 1
Does Feedback really work? The Efficacy of teacher and peer written feedback in enhancing pharmacy students' presentation skills in University of Bahrain-an action research
Ali, F. (2020) · International Conference on e-Learning (econf) · doi:10.1109/econf51404.2020.9385493 · Cited by 1
ENGAGING STUDENTS IN THE PEER-FEEDBACK PROCESS IMPROVED PEER-FEEDBACK ON TEXTS THROUGH THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF A BOARD GAME
Jensen, T. W., & Jensen, G. S. (2011) · Cited by 1
OS POSSÍVEIS BENEFÍCIOS DO USO DE UM FORMULÁRIO DE ORIENTAÇÃO NA REALIZAÇÃO DE ATIVIDADES DE CORREÇÃO COM OS PARES EM LE
de Figueiredo, F. J. Q. (2008) · Signótica · doi:10.5216/sig.v17i2.3727 · Cited by 1
Chinese College Students' Abilities and Attitudes for Peer Review
Jie, Z. (2011) · Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cjal.2011.033 · Cited by 1
LOWER SIX STUDENTS’ PREFERRED MODE OF FEEDBACK FOR ESSAY REVISION
Govindasamy, P. N., Tan, B. H., & Yong, M. F. (2016) · Malaysian Journal of ELT Research · Cited by 1
The Primacy of Teacher Imperative Commentaries in the Improvement of Iranian English Majors’ Writing Ability
Rashtchi, M., & Mirshahidi, S. (2012) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.22111/ijals.2012.81 · Cited by 1
The Effects of Online Peer Feedback with TrackChanges and Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication
유호정, & Choe, H. (2010) · English21 · doi:10.35771/engdoi.2010.23.2.010 · Cited by 1
How EFL Students Take a Position in Peer Feedback Activities: An Activity Theory Perspective
Huh, M.-H. (2012) · The Journal of English Language and Literature · doi:10.15794/jell.2012.58.6.005 · Cited by 1
A percepção de jovens aprendizes de segunda língua em relação à prática de revisão por pares em produção escrita
Spinassé, K. P., & Bolzan, D. B. (2016) · Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language Literatures in English and Cultural Studies · doi:10.5007/2175-8026.2016v69n1p95 · Cited by 1
Don't Get It Right, Just Get It Written
Noursi, O. H. A. (2015) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6619-1.ch013 · Cited by 1
Training EFL Learners How to Benefit from Teacher Feedback in Writing Revision
CHOIYEONHEE (2014) · 교과교육학연구 · doi:10.24231/rici.2014.18.1.215 · Cited by 1
Teacher and peer feedback: Learner perceptions and the efficacy for improvement in L2 writing
주미진, & 김양희 (2010) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.17936/pkelt.2010.22.3.001 · Cited by 1
Social Dynamics During Peer Response: Patterns of Interaction in the L2PR Corpus
Friginal, E., Lee, J. J., Polat, B., & Roberson, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59900-7_12 · Cited by 1
The Benefits of Formative Feedback for Critical Writing in EFL Context
김언조 (2018) · The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal · doi:10.24303/lakdoi.2018.26.1.23 · Cited by 1
Enhancing the Quality of Essays Through a Student Peer-Review Process
du Toit, J. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35343-8_49 · Cited by 1
Teacher mini conferences in class: an alternative to provide feedback in written tasks
Siguenza, P. I., & Espinoza, M.-I. (2020) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 1
COOPERATIVE LEARNING, ACADEMIC, AND SOCIAL GAIN: A STUDY OF MEDIATING ROLE OF TEACHER’S FEEDBACK
Khan, N., Raja, F. U., Haq, M. A. U., Oad, L., & Aslam, R. (2021) · Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews · doi:10.18510/hssr.2021.9319 · Cited by 1
Writing performance in EFL at a college level using peer editing
de Chimborazo, E. S. P., Sánchez, S. E. C., Lozada, X. E. N., & de Ambato, U. T. (2020) · Editorial UTMACH eBooks · doi:10.48190/9789942241375.4 · Cited by 1
TYPES OF FEEDBACK USED BY THE STUDENTS IN INTERMEDIATE WRITING CLASS
Alamsyah, H., Listia, R., & Mu’in, F. (2021) · Lingua Scientia Jurnal Bahasa · doi:10.21274/ls.2021.13.1.103-123 · Cited by 1
Language Teacher Autonomy and Written Feedback: The Case of a Hong Kong Elementary English Teacher
Chong, S. W. (2023) · New language learning and teaching environments · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-18950-0_8 · Cited by 1
EFL Students' Reactions to Peer versus Teacher Feedback to Improve Writing Skills: A Study at Intermediate School Level
Almutairi, R. T. (2023) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v16n4p88 · Cited by 1
Feedback and revision: A protocol analysis
Rajoo, M. (2009) · Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago) · Cited by 1
Assessment for Learning in teaching English to Young Learners: teachers’ understanding, classroom practice and impact on interactions
Britton, A. (2015) · CentAUR (University of Reading) · Cited by 1
Passing the Red Pen: EvoS Journal Offers an Early Education in Peer Review
Sokol, R. I. (2011) · Evolution Education and Outreach · doi:10.1007/s12052-011-0321-x · Cited by 1
STRATEGIES TO ELICIT AND SUSTAIN INTRINSIC MOTIVATION
Candes, M., & Hackney, C. (2010) · Cited by 1
Contextualization: An Experimental Model for EFL Writing Instruction in China
Tang, G. (2017) · doi:10.15760/etd.3363 · Cited by 1
Pragmatic Analysis of Academic Discourse: Insights into Code-Switching
Zahra, T. (2018) · Cited by 1
Contextualization: An Experimental Model for EFL Writing Instruction in China
Tang, G. (2000) · doi:10.15760/etd.5371 · Cited by 1
Innovative Approaches in Teaching English Writing to Chinese SpeakersPreprint
Teng, M. F. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nsrkf · Cited by 1
Expansão ontoepistemológica e práticas pedagógicas na sociedade digital: novas perspectivas para o processo de letramentos
Silva, R. (2024) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.8.2024.tde-03072024-183251 · Cited by 2
Design and Implementation of a Teacher-Guided Semi-automatic Assessment Feedback Generator
Ho, W.-S., Wong, T.-L., Pang, W., & Tang, J. K. T. (2015) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46158-7_10
The Utility of Synthetic-based Approach of Writing among Iranian EFL Learners
Derakhshandeh, N. (2014) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature · doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.3p.195
Collaboration and Writing: More than Exchanging Words
Reed, K. (2014) · Asian Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.65961/ajelt-2014-1-002
Receiving feedback from more advanced learners of English through the internet.
岡村, 晃. (2004) · 高崎経済大学論集
Implementation of Peer Reviews: Online Learning
Colella-Sandercock, J. A., Verbora, A. R., Morrison, O.-P., & Singleton-Jackson, J. A. (2015) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research
The Effects of Form-focused Feedback on Quality of Writing and Performance on Accuracy
Peloghitis, J. (2010) · NUCB journal of language, culture and communicaton
Writing, peer feedback, and revision : a comparison of l1 and l2 college freshmen with longitudinal analyses
Kim, H. (2012) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library)
Collaborative Writing in Composition
Friend, C. R. (2013) · International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design · doi:10.4018/ijopcd.2013070101
AKRAN DÖNÜT EĞĠTĠMĠ PROGRAMININ YAZMA BECERĠLERĠNĠN GELĠġĠMĠ ÜZERĠNDEKĠ ETKĠSĠ
Çiftci, A., & Çöker, B. (2011) · DSpace Repository
La revisión: uso de los comentarios para mejorar textos escritos en inglés.
Villalobos, J. (2006) · Actualidad Contable FACES
DO SECONDARY SECOND LANGUAGE STUDENTS BENEFIT FROM E-MAIL TANDEM PARTNER FEEDBACK?
Priego, S. (2011) · INTED proceedings
The effects of training on incorporation of teacher feedback in L2 writing revision
박성희 (2012) · Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics · doi:10.15738/kjell.12.1.201203.101
EFL Learner's Evaluation of Writing Tasks in Iran's TOEFL and IELTS Preparation Courses in Light of the Process-oriented Approach
Torghabeh, R. A., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2012) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.22111/ijals.2012.77
The use of blogs and teacher electronic response to enhance the revision stage of EFL studentswriting processes
González, E. F. (2012)
Comparing Comments in the L1 and the L2 during the Peer Review Process
Myers, T. S. (2010) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
INVESTIGATING THE REVISION PROCESS IN A WEB-BASED PEER REVIEW SYSTEM USING MACHINE LEARNING
Leijen, D. A. J. (2015) · EDULEARN proceedings
Application of Network Platform in EFL Writing Feedback
Kang, H., & Shi, Z. (2012) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31656-2_106
Feedback via Wikis: Revisions and Improvement
Yusoff, Z. S. (2011) · Global Learn
Implementation and Perception of Online Peer Feedback by Korean EFL Students
박효정, & Choe, H. (2011) · English21 · doi:10.35771/engdoi.2011.24.3.013
Peer versus Self Corrections and the Pursuit of Grammatical Accuracy in FL Writing: Student Perceptions and Realities
Schonagen, M. E. (2008)
Comparisons of Student Perceptions and Evaluations of Using Wiki to Conduct Online Peer Response: An Interschool Project
Lee, H.-C., & Wang, P. (2012) · 國立彰化師範大學文學院學報 · doi:10.29602/xlzy.201209.0010
Self and Peer Assessment Consistency over Time
Ahmadi, A. (2009) · Applied Linguistics
College Students' Revision Behaviors: Are they Motivated by the Inner-drive or Teacher Feedback?
Ryu, H. (2015) · The Journal of Foreign Studies · doi:10.15755/jfs.2015..31.7
Feedback on Peer Feedback in EFL Composing: Four Stories
Huh, M.-H., & 이장호 (2011) · The Journal of English Language and Literature · doi:10.15794/jell.2011.57.6.004
Effects of Peer Comments of Elementary Students on Revision
안상희, & 심유나 (2014) · KOREAN EDUCATION · doi:10.15734/koed..99.201406.123
An exploration of ESL learners' emergent beliefs about academic group work and peer review at a New Zealand university
Hislop, J. L. (2016) · Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)
Teaching the Structures of Academic Writing through Peer Review: A Study on the Beginners of English Language Courses at BRAC University
Chowdhury, M. A. U., & Akteruzzaman, M. (2015) · GSTF Journal on Education · doi:10.7603/s40742-015-0005-2
Revision Types, Effects, and Perceptions of Self Review in Korean Adult EFL Learners
Kim, H., & Choe, H. (2012) · Studies in English Language & Literature · doi:10.21559/aellk.2012.38.4.012
Efficacy of Three Different kinds of Error Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing in China
Tan, Z., & Chen, J. (2015) · International Journal for Innovation Education and Research · doi:10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss3.335
Flipping Assessment: Formative Peer Feedback Activities in Second Language English Writing Using Web 2.0 Applications
Rowan, P. A. R. (2015) · NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University)
A Case for Peer Review Inclusion in Writing Assessment
Bodola, M. R., & Siam, S. D. (2015) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6619-1.ch014
Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Language E-Portfolios
Yang, Y., & Yeh, H. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-0143-7.ch015
The Centrality of Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment for Advancing Secondary School ESL Students' Writing: A Mixed Methods Study
Wagner, M. (2015)
Aspects of Peer Responses and Their Reactions in College Writing Composition
Seo, S. (2011) · korean language education research · doi:10.20880/kler.2011..41.447
The use of rubrics and correction codes in the marking of Grade 10 Sesotho home language creative writing essays
Sibeko, J. (2016) · Boloka Institutional Repository (North-west University)
Efficacy and Implementation of Automated Essay Scoring Software in Instruction of Literacies to High Level ELLs
Alvero, A. (2016) · doi:10.25148/etd.fidc000756
Educational Game with Blogs: Collaborating to Motivate L2 Undergraduates Critical Thinking Disposition
Song, C. (2007) · International Conference on Computers in Education
Effective Writing and Responding Online
Tuzi, F., & Lynn, M. (2008)
Feedback in College English Writing Based on Computer Automated Scoring System
Xiang, Y. (2016) · International Seminar on Education Innovation and Economic Management (SEIEM) · doi:10.2991/seiem-16.2016.20
Exploring Multiple Feedback Methods in a Korean EFL Writing Class
Cha, Y. J., & 박은애 (2010) · 교과교육학연구 · doi:10.24231/rici.2010.14.2.265
Different Rater Groups and Their Feedback on Written Texts: Where Do They Focus Their Attention?
이상기 (2013) · Journal of the Korea English Education Society · doi:10.18649/jkees.2013.12.1.57
Systematic Analyses of Peer and Teacher Feedback: Korean University Students vs. Native English Instructor
김훈밀 (2013) · Journal of the Korea English Education Society · doi:10.18649/jkees.2013.12.3.261
The Effect of Peer Recast on EFL Learners’ Writing Ability
Salehzadeh, M. (2017) · Journal of applied linguistics and language research
Sharing the Knowledge: Browser Based Writing Business Applications.
Evans, N. R., & Tuzi, F. (2001)
Enhance Teachers’ Composition Teaching Literacy and Autonomy through Online Interactive Writing Course – “Learning by Doing”: An Effective Way of Teacher Training
Cheng, G., Chin, C. K., & Tay, B. P. (2015)
Writing development of second language learners of Japanese at an Australian university
Kikuchi, Y. (2017) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne)
EFL Writing Teachers’ Perceptions and Experiences Regarding Multiple Interaction Activities
Lin, H.-C. (2010)
Korean graduate students learning experiences in a blended english writing for academic purposes course
Kim, M. J. (2014) · Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University)
Collaborative Dialogues of Korean High School EFL Learners in Pair Writing
이진영 (2015) · Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University)
Korean EFL Learnersʼ Mitigating Strategies in Written Peer Feedback on Writing
류혜경 (2017) · Journal of Education & Culture · doi:10.24159/joec.2017.23.4.481
مقارنة بین مراجعة الزملاء للمقال وجها لوجه و على الإنترنت :فاعلیة کل من الطریقتین فى تنمیة مهارات الکتابة لدى طلاب الجامعة المصریین
العزیز, م. ع. (2015) · حوليات أداب عين شمس · doi:10.21608/aafu.2015.6346
A Study on the Role of Peer Feedback in High School Learners’ Writing
김경숙, & 서영미 (2016) · The Journal of Studies in Language · doi:10.18627/jslg.32.3.201611.357
The Role of Expertise in Peer Feedback Analysis
Vandepitte, S., & Hanson, J. (2018) · Advances in linguistics and communication studies · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5225-3.ch014
Exploring Peer Feedback in the EFL Pair Debate Assessment
ShinHeeWon, & LeeHo (2018) · English21 · doi:10.35771/engdoi.2018.31.4.011
How do adult beginning Spanish students perceive their teacher's written feedback on their compositions?
Costa, F. A. (2003) · doi:10.33915/etd.720
Use of Student Peer Review in a Writing-Intensive Fashion Course
Yang, J. (2019) · doi:10.31274/itaa.8390
Online MS-Word, Instructional Video for Helping Students Turn-on and Use Immediate Writing Feedback: A Longitudinal Study of Developmental Writing Progress and Self-Efficacy
Barry, W. J. (2018)
Dealing with forty students: peer-assessment as an alternative for English teachers in Indonesia
Sufyan, A., & Hidayat, D. N. (2020) · Leksika Jurnal Bahasa Sastra dan Pengajarannya · doi:10.30595/lks.v14i2.7237
The Effect of Self/Pair vs. Teacher Correction and Task Repetition on Individual and Pair Written Performance.
Zolghadri, M., Jafari, S., & Izadpanah, S. (2020) · Taiwan journal of TESOL
Feedback provision in L2 writing classes: the use of poster presentations to fill a gap
Coomber, M. (2011) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · doi:10.34382/00002645
Whole Brain Thinking : An Educational Alternative for Language Instructors
Ogawa, R. T. (2008) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)
Percepções sobre a escrita recíproca em pares baseada na abordagem de gêneros: perspectiva online em inglês como língua estrangeira
Netto, J. W. D. S., & da Rocha, S. R. (2022) · Miguilim - Revista Eletrônica do Netlli · doi:10.47295/mgren.v10i4.3623
Exploring Techniques of Designing In-Class Writing Drills in Preparatory Courses of Standardized Tests—An Analysis Based upon the Process Approach
陈, 晟. (2020) · Overseas English Testing Pedagogy and Research · doi:10.12677/oetpr.2020.21003
Face-to-Face Peer Review as a Technique to Develop Students' Writing Skill in Producing Narattive TextPreprint
Fentar, Y. C. (2018) · doi:10.31227/osf.io/3fc8k
The Asian Conference on Language 2021: Official Conference Proceedings
(2021) · Asian Conference on Language, official conference proceedings · doi:10.22492/issn.2435-7030.2021
A comparison of lexical feedback on writing received from peers and a teacher
Ruegg, R. (2013) · Vocabulary Learning and Instruction · doi:10.7820/vli.v02.1.ruegg

Authors: Paulus, T. M.
Affiliations: Indiana University (US)
Corresponding author: Paulus, Trena M.
ORCID: Paulus, Trena M.
Venue: Journal of Second Language Writing
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1999-09
Volume: 8
Issue: 3
Pages: 265-289
ISSN: 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9
OpenAlex: W1979413092
Cited by: 522
References: 70
Citations by year: 2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
FWCI: 17.76
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
Keywords: peer feedback, teacher feedback, ESL writing, writing revision, process approach, multiple drafts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks