The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to the literature, there is a difference between teacher feedback and peer feedback as teachers are more subject-matter experts with lots of feedback experiences and knowledge, and compared to students they need less support in providing feedback (Gielen et al., 2010; Paulus, 1999).”
From A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education (2022) · cites this paper as Paulus, 1999
Citations
Cites
The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes
Truscott, J. (1996) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x · Cited by 1,874
Learner Strategies in Language Learning
Ehrman, M. E., Wenden, A. L., & Rubin, J. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328531 · Cited by 1,533
Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications
Silva, T. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587400 · Cited by 860
Zamel, V. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586773 · Cited by 763 · cited 1×
“ness in both the Ll (Hillocks, 1986; Sommers, 1982) and the L2 contexts (Semke, 1984; Zamel, 1985), blaming either the vague, “rubber-stamp” quality of the comments or the reliance on error correction as the primary feedback type (Semke, 1984; Truscott, 1996) that has resulted in negative student attitudes toward and…”
BackgroundThe Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies
Zamel, V. (1983) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586647 · Cited by 712
Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching
Witte, S. P., Larson, R. L., & Hillocks, G. (1987) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357721 · Cited by 694
Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom.
Kroll, B. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · Cited by 656
Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms*
Ferris, D. (1995) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587804 · Cited by 630
Kepner, C. G. (1991) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05359.x · Cited by 627
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618
Salience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality
Robb, T., Ross, S. J., & Shortreed, I. (1986) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586390 · Cited by 568
Sommers, N. I. (1982) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357622 · Cited by 542
What Unskilled ESL Students Do as They Write: A Classroom Study of Composing
Raimes, A. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586828 · Cited by 525
The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes
Leki, I. (1991) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x · Cited by 516
Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.2307/356602 · Cited by 481
Villamil, O. S., & de Guerrero, M. C. M. (1996) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(96)90015-6 · Cited by 477
Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content
Fathman, A. K., & Whalley, E. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524551.016 · Cited by 460
Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision
Flower, L., Hayes, J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.2307/357381 · Cited by 450
Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction
Mendonça, C. O., Johnson, K. E., & Mendonca, C. O. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587558 · Cited by 446
Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
Zhang, S. (1995) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1 · Cited by 405
Semke, H. D. (1984) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x · Cited by 402
Assessing Second Language Writing in Academic Contexts
Kunnan, A. J., & Hamp‐Lyons, L. (1993) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328948 · Cited by 363
Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation
Keh, C. (1990) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/44.4.294 · Cited by 362
Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction
Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1996) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(96)90012-0 · Cited by 351
Coaching from the margins: issues in written response
Leki, I. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524551.008 · Cited by 328
Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?
Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(94)90019-1 · Cited by 310
Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing
Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4 · Cited by 308
ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups
Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90010-8 · Cited by 298
“If I only had more time:” ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions
Polio, C. G., Fleck, C., & Leder, N. (1998) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90005-4 · Cited by 277
Raimes, A. (1987) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00579.x · Cited by 266
Peer Response Groups: Do L2 Writers Use Peer Comments in Revising Their Drafts?
Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586965 · Cited by 246
Richness in Writing: Empowering Esl Students
Johnson, D. M., & Roen, D. H. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 242
Feedback on compositions: teacher and student verbal reports
Cohen, A. D., & Cavalcanti, M. D. C. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524551.015 · Cited by 235
Analyzing Talk in ESL Peer Response Groups: Stances, Functions, and Content
Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00456.x · Cited by 235
ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work
Radecki, P. M., & Swales, J. M. (1988) · System · doi:10.1016/0346-251x(88)90078-4 · Cited by 233
Revising Strategies in Twelfth Grade Students’ Transactional Writing
Bridwell, L. S. (1980) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte198015795 · Cited by 228
Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators
Stanley, J. (1992) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90004-9 · Cited by 219
Peer Response Groups in the Writing Classroom: Theoretic Foundations and New Directions
DiPardo, A., & Freedman, S. W. (1988) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543058002119 · Cited by 211
Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications
Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., & Tinti, S. (1997) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90032-1 · Cited by 207
New directions in composition research
Beach, R. W., & Bridwell, L. S. (1984) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 203
Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction
Hedgcock, J. S., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90006-b · Cited by 201
An overview of second language writing process research
Krapels, A. R. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524551.007 · Cited by 187
Responding to ESL Students' Texts: The Myths of Appropriation
Reid, J. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587434 · Cited by 187
Saito, H. (1994) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v11i2.633 · Cited by 183
Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think?
Mangelsdorf, K. (1992) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/46.3.274 · Cited by 164
Hyland, K. (1990) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/44.4.279 · Cited by 162
Comparing Teacher and Student Responses to Written Work
Caulk, N. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587209 · Cited by 157
Managing the Complexity of Revising across Languages
Hall, C. (1990) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586851 · Cited by 155
Some Input on Input: Two Analyses of Student Response to Expert Feedback in L2 Writing
Hedgcock, J. S., & Lefkowitz, N. (1996) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01612.x · Cited by 151
Assessing Second Language Writing in Academic Contexts
Leki, I., & Hamp‐Lyons, L. (1993) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/358997 · Cited by 147
The Effects of Feedback on Students' Composition Revisions
Chaudron, C. (1984) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/003368828401500201 · Cited by 138
Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing
Enginarlar, H. (1993) · System · doi:10.1016/0346-251x(93)90041-e · Cited by 128
Process approaches in ESL/EFL writing instruction
Susser, B. (1994) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(94)90004-3 · Cited by 125
Triangulation in Classroom Research: A Study of Peer Revision
McGroarty, M. E., & Zhu, W. (1997) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.11997001 · Cited by 111
ESL student response stances in a peer-review task
Mangelsdorf, K., & Schlumberger, A. (1992) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90005-a · Cited by 109
The Interaction of Instruction, Teacher Comment, and Revision in Teaching the Composing Process
Hillocks, G. (1982) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte198215736 · Cited by 98
Learner self-correction in EFL written compositions
Makino, T.-Y. (1993) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/47.4.337 · Cited by 91
Exploring the Dynamics of Cross-Cultural Collaboration in Writing Classrooms
Allaei, S. K., & Connor, U. (1990) · IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) · Cited by 74
The Effect of Teacher Comments on the Writing of Four College Freshmen.
Ziv, N. D. (1980) · Cited by 70
"Spinach to Chocolate": Changing Awareness and Attitudes in ESL Writing Teachers
Winer, L. S. (1992) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587369 · Cited by 52
Working with Peer Groups in the Composition Classroom
George, D. (1984) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357460 · Cited by 49
Chenoweth, N. A. (1987) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/41.1.25 · Cited by 35
How ESL Teachers and Peers Evaluate and Respond to Student Writing
Devenney, R. (1989) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/003368828902000106 · Cited by 25
Lam, C. Y. P. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9
Revising strategies of Thai students : Text-level changes in essays written in Thai and in English
Tagong, K. (1991) · UMI Dissertation Information Service eBooks · Cited by 8
ESL composition : analyzing revision
Belcher, L. R. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Cohen, 1994, Verbal reports on learning strategies, TESOL Quarterly, 28, 678
- Hedgcock, 1994, Feedback on feedback: assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141, 10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Mittan, 1989, The peer review process: harnessing students' communicative power, 207
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Feedback on second language students' writing
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444806003399 · Cited by 1,048
To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002 · Cited by 843
The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately
Truscott, J. (2007) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003 · Cited by 771
A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004 · Cited by 703
Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching
Norris, J. M. (2006) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.13 · Cited by 617
Metadata
- Authors
- Paulus, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Paulus, Trena M.
- ORCID
- Paulus, Trena M.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-289
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979413092
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 17.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Keywords
- peer feedback, teacher feedback, ESL writing, writing revision, process approach, multiple drafts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
