The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to the literature, there is a difference between teacher feedback and peer feedback as teachers are more subject-matter experts with lots of feedback experiences and knowledge, and compared to students they need less support in providing feedback (Gielen et al., 2010; Paulus, 1999).”
From A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education (2022) · cites this paper as Paulus, 1999
Citations
Cites
The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes
Truscott, J. (1996) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x · Cited by 1,874
Learner Strategies in Language Learning
Ehrman, M. E., Wenden, A. L., & Rubin, J. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328531 · Cited by 1,533
Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications
Silva, T. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587400 · Cited by 860
Zamel, V. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586773 · Cited by 763 · cited 1×
“ness in both the Ll (Hillocks, 1986; Sommers, 1982) and the L2 contexts (Semke, 1984; Zamel, 1985), blaming either the vague, “rubber-stamp” quality of the comments or the reliance on error correction as the primary feedback type (Semke, 1984; Truscott, 1996) that has resulted in negative student attitudes toward and…”
BackgroundThe Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies
Zamel, V. (1983) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586647 · Cited by 712
Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching
Witte, S. P., Larson, R. L., & Hillocks, G. (1987) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357721 · Cited by 694
Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom.
Kroll, B. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · Cited by 656
Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms*
Ferris, D. (1995) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587804 · Cited by 630
Kepner, C. G. (1991) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05359.x · Cited by 627
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Cohen, 1994, Verbal reports on learning strategies, TESOL Quarterly, 28, 678
- Hedgcock, 1994, Feedback on feedback: assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141, 10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Mittan, 1989, The peer review process: harnessing students' communicative power, 207
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 525
Zhao, H. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1434610 · Cited by 48
Arslan, R. Ş. (2013) · The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology · Cited by 47
Metacognitive Instruction for Peer Review Interaction in L2 Writing
Bui, G., & Kong, A. (2019) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.05 · Cited by 48
Using Google Docs for Peer-then-Teacher Review on Middle School Students’ Writing
Neumann, K. L., & Kopcha, T. J. (2019) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102524 · Cited by 46
Effects of anonymity on online peer review in second-language writing
van den Bos, A. H., & Tan, E. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103638 · Cited by 45
Wu, W., Huang, J., Han, C., & Zhang, J. (2022) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101140 · Cited by 45
Chen, C. W. (2010) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-010-9081-5 · Cited by 44
Gutiérrez, X. (2008) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00785.x · Cited by 47
Feedback preferences of EFL learners with respect to their learning styles
Taşdemir, M. S., & Arslan, F. Y. (2018) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2018.1481560 · Cited by 44
Effective Interfaces for Student-Driven Revision Sessions for Argumentative Writing
Afrin, T., Kashefi, O., Olshefski, C. A., Litman, D., Hwa, R., & Godley, A. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445683 · Cited by 44
The Effects of Online Feedback Training on Students’ Text Revision
Yang, Y.-F., & Meng, W.-T. (2013) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44331 · Cited by 44
Yu, S., Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2016) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-015-0262-1 · Cited by 41
Алексеевна, М. Л., Shutaya, N. K., Юрьевна, С. Е., Ивановна, Л. О., & Aleshina, L. N. (2016) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature · doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.158 · Cited by 43
Ho, P. V. P. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1609521 · Cited by 41
A Case Study of Peer Feedback in a Chinese EFL Writing Classroom
Mei, T., & Qian, Y. (2010) · Cited by 41
Peer review: Is Giving Corrective Feedback Better than Receiving it in L2 Writing?
Rouhi, A., & Azizian, E. (2013) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.042 · Cited by 40
Providing Formative Peer Feedback
Panadero, E., Jönsson, A., & Alqassab, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.020 · Cited by 41
Bouwer, R., & Dirkx, K. (2023) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101745 · Cited by 37
Using peer feedback in a Master's programme: a multiple case study
Poverjuc, O., Brooks, V., & Wray, D. (2011) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.641008 · Cited by 40
Lu, Q., Zhu, X., & Cheong, C. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739962 · Cited by 40
Dynamic Motives in ESL Computer-Mediated Peer Response
Jin, L., & Zhu, W. (2010) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2010.09.001 · Cited by 36
Martin, L., & Mottet, T. P. (2010) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.496868 · Cited by 36
Doing peer review and receiving feedback: impact on scientific literacy and writing skills
Geithner, C. A., & Pollastro, A. N. (2016) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00071.2015 · Cited by 35
Wu, C., Zhang, Y.-W., & Li, A. W. (2023) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04574-w · Cited by 35
Potter, T., Englund, L., Charbonneau, J., MacLean, M., Newell, J., & Roll, I. (2017) · Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal · doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.2.8 · Cited by 34
Liaqat, A., Munteanu, C., & Epp, C. D. (2020) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-020-00204-4 · Cited by 41
Reynolds, B. L., Kao, C.-W., & Huang, Y.-Y. (2021) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-021-00597-3 · Cited by 34
Peer review in an online college writing course
Coit, C. (2004) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt.2004.1357712 · Cited by 34
Zarrinabadi, N., & Rahimi, S. (2021) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2021.1934928 · Cited by 33
Rodríguez-González, E., & Castañeda, M. E. (2016) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2015.1108978 · Cited by 32
Peer review and training: Pathways to quality and value in second language writing
Sánchez‐Naranjo, J. (2019) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12414 · Cited by 31
The impact of portfolio-based writing instruction on writing performance and anxiety of EFL students
Fathi, J., Derakhshan, A., & Safdari, M. (2020) · Polish Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.24425/ppb.2020.134729 · Cited by 33
Investigating English Language Learning and Teaching
Pawlak, M. (2008) · Repozytorium Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań) · Cited by 30
Effectiveness of Teacher and Peer Feedback : Through the Lens of Korean Tertiary Writing Classroom
Park, J. (2018) · The Journal of AsiaTEFL · doi:10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.2.11.429 · Cited by 29
Montanero, M., Fustes, M. L., & Sánchez, M. J. F. (2014) · Journal for the Study of Education and Development Infancia y Aprendizaje · doi:10.1080/02103702.2014.881653 · Cited by 29
Using Peer Feedback to Improve Students’ Scientific Inquiry
Tasker, T. Q., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2016) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-016-9454-7 · Cited by 29
Colognesi, S., Vassart, C., Blondeau, B., & Coertjens, L. (2020) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100917 · Cited by 28
Chen, H., & Hu, G. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101430 · Cited by 28
Lee, C.-C., & Tan, S. C. (2010) · Educational Media International · doi:10.1080/09523987.2010.492678 · Cited by 29
Brooks, G. (2013) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · Cited by 28
Intervención en estrategias de revisión del mensaje escrito
Sánchez, J. N. G., & Gundín, O. A. (2004) · Buleria (Universidad de León) · Cited by 28
Complementation of multiple sources of feedback in EFL learners’ writing
Niu, R., Shan, P., & You, X. (2021) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100549 · Cited by 27
Engeness, I. (2018) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2017.1421259 · Cited by 27
The operating mechanisms of self-efficacy and peer feedback: An exploration of L2 young writers
Kong, A., & Teng, M. F. (2020) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2020-0019 · Cited by 26
EFL Saudi Student's attitudes toward peer feedback activities in a writing class
Alsehibany, R. A. (2021) · PSU Research Review · doi:10.1108/prr-01-2021-0004 · Cited by 26
Kim, H. R., Bowles, M. A., Yan, X., & Chung, S. J. (2018) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.006 · Cited by 26
Eckstein, G. (2013) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.001 · Cited by 26
The Effectiveness of Adopting E-Readers to Facilitate EFL Students' Process-Based Academic Writing.
Hung, H.-C., & Young, S. S. C. (2015) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 25
Saeli, H., & Rahmati, P. (2023) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100788 · Cited by 24
최재호 (2013) · English Teaching · doi:10.15858/engtea.68.3.201309.187 · Cited by 26
Moussaoui, S. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.127 · Cited by 24
Kao, C.-W., & Reynolds, B. L. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03522-3 · Cited by 26
Annotation and Classification of Sentence-level Revision Improvement
Afrin, T., & Litman, D. J. (2018) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-0528 · Cited by 23
Corcelles, M., Ortiz, M. I. C., Faz, G. B., & Vega, N. (2013) · REDU Revista de Docencia Universitaria · doi:10.4995/redu.2013.5593 · Cited by 22
Joyner, D. A., Ashby, W., Irish, L., Lam, Y., Langston, J., Lupiani, I., Lustig, M., Pettoruto, P., Sheahen, D., Smiley, A., et al. (2016) · ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S) · doi:10.1145/2876034.2876044 · Cited by 22
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING: A Study of Practices and Effectiveness in the Bahrain Context
Mohamed, M. (2013) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 21
Tavakoli, M., & Rezazadeh, M. (2014) · Journal of teaching language skills · doi:10.22099/jtls.2014.1857 · Cited by 20
The role and features of peer assessment feedback in college English writing
Sun, Q., Chen, F., & Yin, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1070618 · Cited by 19
Blain, S., & Lafontaine, L. (2010) · Revue des sciences de l éducation · doi:10.7202/044486ar · Cited by 19
An investigation of university EFL students' attitudes toward peer and teacher feedback
Srıchanyachon, N. (2012) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.5897/err12.060 · Cited by 19
A CASE STUDY OF COMBINED PEER-TEACHER FEEDBACK ON PARAGRAPH WRITING AT A UNIVERSITY IN THAILAND
Nguyen, T. T. L. (2017) · Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8345 · Cited by 19
Rouhi, A., Dibah, M., & Mohebbi, H. (2020) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-020-00093-z · Cited by 18
The Dynamics of Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Second Language Development
Kowal, I. (2016) · Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego eBooks · doi:10.4467/k9474.72/16.16.6986 · Cited by 18
Malaysian Secondary School Students' ESL Writing Performance in an Intensive English Program
Mukundan, J., Mahvelati, E. H., Din, M. A., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2013) · Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) · Cited by 18
Triangulation of language assessment modes: learning benefits and socio-cognitive prospects
Ghahari, S., & Farokhnia, F. (2017) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2017.1342540 · Cited by 18
Reflections on peer feedback in disciplinary courses as a tool in pre-service teacher training
Seroussi, D., Sharon, R., Peled, Y., & Yaffe, Y. (2019) · Cambridge Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/0305764x.2019.1581134 · Cited by 21
Chinese versus UK marketing students' perceptions of peer feedback and peer assessment
McLeay, F., & Wesson, D. (2014) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2014.03.005 · Cited by 18
The development of an ESL OWL, or learning how to tutor writing online
Rilling, S. (2005) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2005.05.006 · Cited by 18
Sahragard, R., & Mallahi, O. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.585 · Cited by 17
A Data-Driven Approach for the Identification of Features for Automated Feedback on Academic Essays
Abbas, M., van Rosmalen, P., & Kalz, M. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2023.3320877 · Cited by 16
Rehman, N., Huang, X., Mahmood, A., Maqbool, S., & Javed, S. (2024) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1155/2024/1271802 · Cited by 16
Metapragmatic comments in web-based intercultural peer evaluation
Ping, L., & You, X. (2019) · Intercultural Pragmatics · doi:10.1515/ip-2019-0003 · Cited by 16
Impact of Written Corrective Feedback on Malaysian ESL Secondary Students’ Writing Performance
Ganapathy, M. N. G., Lin, D. T. A., & Phan, J. (2020) · 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies · doi:10.17576/3l-2020-2603-11 · Cited by 16
EFL Students’ Attitudes Towards Teacher Correction and Peer Correction in Writing Skills
Vo, T. T. M. (2022) · International Journal of Language Instruction · doi:10.54855/ijli.221113 · Cited by 16
Feedback effectiveness in professional learning contexts
Johnson, M. (2016) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3061 · Cited by 21
The Impact of Peer Review on EFL Learners’ Writing Proficiency: Global and Local Aspects
Sotoudehnama, E. (2016) · Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras · doi:10.30827/digibug.53887 · Cited by 16
Native and non-native English speaking student teachers engage in peer feedback
McGarrell, H. M. (2010) · Cited by 15
The impact of Automated Essay Scoring (AES) for improving English language learner's essay writing
Choi, J. (2010) · Cited by 15
Is Peer Feedback an Effective Approach for Creating Dialogue in Politics?
Blair, A., Curtis, S., & McGinty, S. (2012) · European Political Science · doi:10.1057/eps.2012.2 · Cited by 15
Do Peer Reviews Help Improve Student Writing Abilities in an EFL High School Classroom?
Kurihara, N. (2016) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.282 · Cited by 15
Effects of Integrated Feedback on Academic Writing Achievement
Yamalee, E., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2019) · Arab World English Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3466011 · Cited by 15
Teaching Writing Using Google Apps For Education (GAFE)
Daud, A. (2019) · Indonesian Journal of Economics Social and Humanities · doi:10.31258/ijesh.1.1.2 · Cited by 15
Coté, R. A. (2014) · GiST Education and Learning Research Journal · doi:10.26817/16925777.144 · Cited by 15
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR REFLECTIVE ESSAY WRITING EXPERIENCE AND TEACHER FEEDBACK COMMENTS
Sharif, A. M., & Zainuddin, S. Z. (2017) · Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.17509/ijal.v6i2.4845 · Cited by 15
EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy: Effects of Direct and Metalinguistic Electronic Feedback
Saadi, Z. K., & Saadat, M. (2015) · Theory and Practice in Language Studies · doi:10.17507/tpls.0510.11 · Cited by 15
The Effect of Sustained Teacher Feedback on CAF, Content and Organization in EFL Writing
Rastgou, A., Storch, N., & Knoch, U. (2020) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.30466/ijltr.2020.120888 · Cited by 14
Zaccaron, R., & Xhafaj, D. C. P. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102367 · Cited by 14
A Self-assessment Checklist for Undergraduate Students’ Argumentative Writing
(2014) · Advances in Language and Literary Studies · doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.1p.65 · Cited by 14
Peer feedback on writing: Is on-line actually better than on-paper?
Ellis, M. J. L. (2011) · Journal of academic language and learning · Cited by 14
Yeh, S.-W., Lo, J., & Chu, H.-M. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.09.015 · Cited by 14
Lin, H.-C. (2009) · OpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale) · Cited by 14
Investigation of Writing Habits of Primary School Teachers
Sulak, S. E. (2018) · lnternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education · doi:10.26822/iejee.2018438140 · Cited by 13
Ahangari, S. (2014) · Advances in Language and Literary Studies · doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.1p.81 · Cited by 13
Song, C. (2008) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520810913963 · Cited by 13
Lee, H. (2017) · The Journal of AsiaTEFL · doi:10.18823/asiatefl.2017.14.3.6.464 · Cited by 13
Teachers’ written feedback comments on narrative texts in Elementary and Secondary Education
Fustes, M. L., Sánchez, M. J. F., & Montanero, M. (2018) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.002 · Cited by 13
Early, J. S., & Saidy, C. (2013) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9483-y · Cited by 13
A Comparison of E-Response: Two Experiences; One Conclusion
Tannacito, T. L. (2002) · UC Santa Barbara · doi:10.7940/m37.3.coverweb.tannacito-et-al · Cited by 13
Cognitive Conflicts and Resolutions in Online Text Revisions: Three Profiles
Yang, Y. (2010) · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Paulus, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Paulus, Trena M.
- ORCID
- Paulus, Trena M.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-289
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979413092
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 17.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Keywords
- peer feedback, teacher feedback, ESL writing, writing revision, process approach, multiple drafts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review