The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to the literature, there is a difference between teacher feedback and peer feedback as teachers are more subject-matter experts with lots of feedback experiences and knowledge, and compared to students they need less support in providing feedback (Gielen et al., 2010; Paulus, 1999).”
From A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education (2022) · cites this paper as Paulus, 1999
Citations
Cites
The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes
Truscott, J. (1996) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x · Cited by 1,874
Learner Strategies in Language Learning
Ehrman, M. E., Wenden, A. L., & Rubin, J. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328531 · Cited by 1,533
Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications
Silva, T. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587400 · Cited by 860
Zamel, V. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586773 · Cited by 763 · cited 1×
“ness in both the Ll (Hillocks, 1986; Sommers, 1982) and the L2 contexts (Semke, 1984; Zamel, 1985), blaming either the vague, “rubber-stamp” quality of the comments or the reliance on error correction as the primary feedback type (Semke, 1984; Truscott, 1996) that has resulted in negative student attitudes toward and…”
BackgroundThe Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies
Zamel, V. (1983) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586647 · Cited by 712
Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching
Witte, S. P., Larson, R. L., & Hillocks, G. (1987) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357721 · Cited by 694
Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom.
Kroll, B. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · Cited by 656
Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms*
Ferris, D. (1995) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587804 · Cited by 630
Kepner, C. G. (1991) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05359.x · Cited by 627
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Cohen, 1994, Verbal reports on learning strategies, TESOL Quarterly, 28, 678
- Hedgcock, 1994, Feedback on feedback: assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141, 10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Mittan, 1989, The peer review process: harnessing students' communicative power, 207
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Feedback on second language students' writing
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444806003399 · Cited by 1,048
To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002 · Cited by 843
The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately
Truscott, J. (2007) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003 · Cited by 771
A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004 · Cited by 703
Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching
Norris, J. M. (2006) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.13 · Cited by 617
The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality
Min, H.-T. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 · Cited by 482
The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3 · Cited by 446
Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education
Jonsson, A. (2013) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787412467125 · Cited by 414
Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task
Qi, D. S., & Lapkin, S. (2001) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00046-7 · Cited by 383
Zhu, W. Y., & Mitchell, D. A. (2012) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.22 · Cited by 373
The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing
Liu, J., & Sadler, R. W. (2003) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/s1475-1585(03)00025-0 · Cited by 318
Peer reviewers learn from giving comments
Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1 · Cited by 294
Peer Feedback in Second Language Writing
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1017/s0261444816000161 · Cited by 322
Zhao, H. (2010) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002 · Cited by 273
Montgomery, J. L., & Baker, W. (2007) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.002 · Cited by 269
The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course
Tuzi, F. (2004) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003 · Cited by 267
Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers
Hu, G. (2005) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168805lr169oa · Cited by 248
Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., van Ginkel, S., Macfadyen, L. P., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100489 · Cited by 246
Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005 · Cited by 243
How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners?
Arslan, R. Ş., & Kızıl, A. Ş. (2010) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.486575 · Cited by 221
Goldstein, L. M. (2004) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.006 · Cited by 199
Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing
Fan, Y., & Xu, J. (2020) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100775 · Cited by 222
Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: a research synthesis
Chen, T. (2016) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.960942 · Cited by 130
Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1 · Cited by 182
Learning to Write in a Second Language: Two Decades of Research
Sfudies, E. (2001) · Digitum: Institutional Repository of the University of Murcia (University of Murcia) · doi:10.6018/ijes.1.2.48331 · Cited by 182
Chao, Y.-C. J., & Lo, H.-C. (2009) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820903298662 · Cited by 180
Collaboration or Cooperation? Analyzing Group Dynamics and Revision Processes in Wikis
Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C. R. (2012) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.29.3.431-448 · Cited by 179
Training effects on computer-mediated peer review
Liou, H., & Peng, Z.-Y. (2009) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.01.005 · Cited by 179
(2007) · ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) · Cited by 179
Hovardas, T., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.019 · Cited by 176
The Effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2-writing development: a meta-analysis.
Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.x · Cited by 175
L2 output, reformulation and noticing: Implications for IL development
Adams, R. (2003) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168803lr127oa · Cited by 179
Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center
Williams, J. (2004) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.009 · Cited by 164
Peer review in higher education: Student perceptions before and after participation
Mulder, R. A., Pearce, J. M., & Baik, C. (2014) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787414527391 · Cited by 163
Strengthening dialogic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in SPOCs
Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. A. M., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen, H. V. M., & Grobbee, D. E. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.004 · Cited by 163
Peer review as a strategy for improving students’ writing process
Baker, K. M. (2016) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787416654794 · Cited by 160
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831220945266 · Cited by 150
Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry
Wang, W. (2013) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008 · Cited by 142
Face-to-face and Computer-mediated Peer Review in EFL Writing
Ho, M.-C., & Savignon, S. J. (2007) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v24i2.269-290 · Cited by 140
Affordances of Web 2.0 Technologies for Collaborative Advanced Writing in a Foreign Language
Strobl, C. (2014) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.31.1.1-18 · Cited by 131
Contexts and Issues in Feedback on L2 Writing
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108635547.003 · Cited by 137
The relative effects of peer and teacher feedback on improvement in EFL students’ writing ability
Ruegg, R. (2014) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/j.linged.2014.12.001 · Cited by 120
Allen, T. J., & Mizumoto, A. (2024) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882241262533 · Cited by 131
Dannels, D. P., & Martin, K. N. (2008) · Journal of Business and Technical Communication · doi:10.1177/1050651907311923 · Cited by 131
How does student peer review influence perceptions, engagement and academic outcomes? A case study
Mulder, R. A., Baik, C., Naylor, R., & Pearce, J. M. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.860421 · Cited by 116
Lechermeier, J., & Faßnacht, M. (2018) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-018-0136-8 · Cited by 115
A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback
Lam, R. (2010) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v27i2.1052 · Cited by 113
Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?
Diab, N. M. (2015) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001 · Cited by 106
Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback
McGarrell, H., & Verbeem, J. (2007) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccm030 · Cited by 102
Investigating teacher-supported peer assessment for EFL writing
Zhao, H. (2014) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/cct068 · Cited by 99
Exploring the role of reformulations and a model text in EFL students’ writing performance
Yang, L., & Ling, Z. (2010) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168810375369 · Cited by 99
Two Decades of Research in L2 Peer Review
Chang, C. Y.-H. (2016) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.03 · Cited by 96
The impact of second language proficiency in dyadic peer feedback
Allen, D. B., & Mills, A. (2014) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168814561902 · Cited by 95
Peer assessment in an EFL context: attitudes and friendship bias
Azarnoosh, M. (2013) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/2229-0443-3-11 · Cited by 94
Reviewer stances and writer perceptions in EFL peer review training
Min, H.-T. (2008) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2008.02.002 · Cited by 93
Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: peers or computer program
Lai, Y. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00959.x · Cited by 92
Diab, N. M. (2011) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.08.001 · Cited by 90
DeLay, D., Zhang, L., Hanish, L. D., Miller, C. F., Fabes, R. A., Martin, C. L., Kochel, K. P., & Updegraff, K. A. (2016) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-016-0678-8 · Cited by 89
Peer-feedback and revision process in a wiki mediated collaborative writing
Woo, M. M., Chu, S. K. W., & Li, X. (2013) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9285-y · Cited by 89
Effects of feedback on collaborative writing in an online learning environment
Guasch, T., Espasa, A., Valdivia, I. M. Á., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835772 · Cited by 89
Examining the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Second Language Writing: A Meta‐Analysis
Vuogan, A., & Li, S. (2022) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.3178 · Cited by 87
Zeevy-Solovey, O. (2024) · Technology in Language Teaching & Learning · doi:10.29140/tltl.v6n3.1482 · Cited by 86
Chon, Y. V., Shin, D., & Kim, G. E. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102408 · Cited by 84
A reciprocal peer review system to support college students' writing
Yang, Y. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01059.x · Cited by 82
Zhang, H., Song, W., Shen, S., & Huang, R. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.860 · Cited by 79
Yu, S.-L. (2019) · Assessing Writing: An International Journal · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.004 · Cited by 71
Ying, C., Schunn, C. D., Gai, X., Jiang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788474 · Cited by 86
Panadero, E. (2023) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2023.2223642 · Cited by 76
Weigle, S. C., & Nelson, G. L. (2004) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.011 · Cited by 74
Chen, J., & Brown, K. L. (2011) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.606224 · Cited by 74
Jahin, J. H. (2012) · The Australian journal of teacher education · doi:10.14221/ajte.2012v37n11.3 · Cited by 73
Using peer computer-mediated corrective feedback to support EFL learners' writing
AbuSeileek, A. F., & Abu-Al-Sha'r, A. M. (2014) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44355 · Cited by 74
Grami, G. M. A. (2010) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 73
Furneaux, C., Paran, A., & Fairfax, B. (2007) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral.2007.003 · Cited by 72
Gao, Y., Schunn, C. D. D., & Yu, Q. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1499075 · Cited by 71
Dannels, D. P., Gaffney, A. L. H., & Martin, K. N. (2008) · International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020212 · Cited by 75
Differences in the Uptake of Peer and Teacher Feedback
Ruegg, R. (2015) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688214562799 · Cited by 70
Facilitating Students’ Active Engagement with Feedback
Jönsson, A., & Panadero, E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.026 · Cited by 69
EFL writing revision with blind expert and peer review using a CMC open forum
Wu, W.-C. V., Petit, E., & Chen, C. (2014) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.937442 · Cited by 69
Second Language Pronunciation Assessment
Ballard, L., Barker, F., Blanchet, J., Browne, K., Darcy, I., Davies, A., Fulcher, G., Galaczi, E., Guénette, D., Harding, L., et al. (2016) · Multilingual Matters eBooks · doi:10.21832/isaacs6848 · Cited by 79
Student attitudes that predict participation in peer assessment
Zou, Y., Schunn, C. D., Wang, Y., & Zhang, F. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1409872 · Cited by 75
THE BEST OF TWO APPROACHES: PROCESS/ GENRE- BASED APPROACH TO TEACHING WRITING
Nordin, S. M., & Mohammad, N. B. (2017) · The English Teacher · Cited by 67
DIGITAL STORYTELLING IN THE FOREIGN LANGUAGE CLASSROOM
Reinders, H. (2010) · Unitec Research Bank (Unitec Institute of Technology) · Cited by 64
Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Gai, X. (2022) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2021.1969541 · Cited by 63
Correa, M. (2014) · Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning · doi:10.5294/laclil.2014.7.1.1 · Cited by 63
Chen, S., Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12604 · Cited by 62
Relative second language proficiency and the giving and receiving of written peer feedback
Allen, D., & Katayama, A. (2016) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.12.002 · Cited by 60
Jiang, Y. (2024) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100975 · Cited by 62
The effect of blog peer review and teacher feedback on the revisions of EFL writers
Wu, W.-S. (2006) · doi:10.6372/jefll.200607.0125 · Cited by 59
Mawlawi Diab, N. (2016) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.12.014 · Cited by 34
A case study of an EFL writing teacher's belief and practice about written feedback
Min, H. (2013) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.07.018 · Cited by 58
Assessing peer and instructor response to writing: A corpus analysis from an expert survey
Anson, I. G., & Anson, C. M. (2017) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.001 · Cited by 57
The effects of teacher-written direct vs. indirect feedback on students' writing
Jamalinesari, A., Rahimi, F., Gowhary, H., & Azizifar, A. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.018 · Cited by 55
Zhang, F., Schunn, C. D., & Baikadi, A. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9420-6
A Comprehensive Review of Studies on Second Language Writing
Zhang, J. (2008) · Cited by 51
Teaching Writing Through Process-Genre Based Approach
Rusinovci, X. (2015) · US-China Education Review A · doi:10.17265/2161-623x/2015.10a.006 · Cited by 51
The Effects of the Peer Feedback Process on Reviewers’ Own Writing
Wakabayashi, R. (2013) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v6n9p177 · Cited by 14
Teacher modeling on EFL reviewers’ audience-aware feedback and affectivity in L2 peer review
Chang, C. Y.-H. (2015) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.04.001 · Cited by 52
Al-Hazmi, S. H., Scholfield, P., & Arabia, S. (2007) · Cited by 48
Exploring Teacher Written Feedback and Student Revisions on ESL Students’ Writing
Razali, R., & Jupri, R. (2014) · IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science · doi:10.9790/0837-19556370 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Paulus, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Paulus, Trena M.
- ORCID
- Paulus, Trena M.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-289
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979413092
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 17.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Keywords
- peer feedback, teacher feedback, ESL writing, writing revision, process approach, multiple drafts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review