Cited by 25Pituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsBone health and osteoporosis research

Axial bone mineral density in patients with acromegaly

Bolanowski, Marek, Wielgus, Wojciech, Milewicz, Andrzej, Marciniak, Roman·2000·Academic Radiology

Abstract

Rationale and objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of long-term elevated levels of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I on bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine in patients with acromegaly. Materials and methods The spinal BMD in 40 patients with acromegaly was measured with quantitative computed tomography. The result was expressed as the mean of six measurements of consecutive vertebral bodies and as a z score. Twenty age- and sex-matched healthy persons also underwent spinal BMD measurement and served as controls. Results In 36 of the 40 patients, the BMD z score ranged within 2 standard deviations (SDs) above or below the mean. Only two patients (one man and one woman) had enhanced BMD loss (below 2 SD). Two other female patients had BMD values of more than 2 SD above the mean. Differences between patient subgroups were not statistically significant, but a statistically significant (P Conclusion Hypersecretion of growth hormone in patients with acromegaly, regardless of other factors, has no evident effect on BMD of the lumbar spine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1076-6332(00)80573-5

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Information about the influence of GH excess on BMD varies in the literature: in some studies BMD was increased or within reference ranges, while in other papers it was decreased.

    “Information about the influence of GH excess on BMD varies in the literature. In some studies BMD was reported to be increased or within the reference ranges, while in other papers it was decreased [17, 26, 34–37].”

    From Pituitary Disorders and Osteoporosis (2015) · cites this paper as [37]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bolanowski, M., Wielgus, W., Milewicz, A., & Marciniak, R.
Affiliations
University of Wrocław (PL)
Venue
Academic Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-08
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
592-594
ISSN
1076-6332 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023522186
Cited by
25
References
9
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
acromegaly, bone mineral density, lumbar spine, growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor I, hypersecretion, vertebral body, Z-score, bone loss
MeSH terms
Acromegaly, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Male, Middle Aged, Bone Density, Human Growth Hormone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review