The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beware of q2!
Abstract
Validation is a crucial aspect of any quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling. This paper examines one of the most popular validation criteria, leave-one-out cross-validated R2 (LOO q2). Often, a high value of this statistical characteristic (q2 > 0.5) is considered as a proof of the high predictive ability of the model. In this paper, we show that this assumption is generally incorrect. In the case of 3D QSAR, the lack of the correlation between the high LOO q2 and the high predictive ability of a QSAR model has been established earlier [Pharm. Acta Helv. 70 (1995) 149; J. Chemomet. 10(1996)95; J. Med. Chem. 41 (1998) 2553]. In this paper, we use two-dimensional (2D) molecular descriptors and k nearest neighbors (kNN) QSAR method for the analysis of several datasets. No correlation between the values of q2 for the training set and predictive ability for the test set was found for any of the datasets. Thus, the high value of LOO q2 appears to be the necessary but not the sufficient condition for the model to have a high predictive power. We argue that this is the general property of QSAR models developed using LOO cross-validation. We emphasize that the external validation is the only way to establish a reliable QSAR model. We formulate a set of criteria for evaluation of predictive ability of QSAR models.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Importantly, QSAR modeling was one of the first research fields that highlighted the importance of data curation,13 rigorous validation of developed models,14 and data reproducibility,15 that has recently become a significant concern to the scientific community.16”
From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Similarly, rigorous model validation prior to prediction14 and the importance of rigor in modeling protocols291 have been articulated in several seminal publications in QSAR field292 and have already been adopted as regulatory requirements.84”
From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
Harary, F. (1969) · Cited by 10,739
Structural Determination of Paraffin Boiling Points
Wiener, H. (1947) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01193a005 · Cited by 4,184
Cramer, R. D., Patterson, D. E., & Bunce, J. D. (1988) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00226a005 · Cited by 3,931
Characterization of molecular branching
Randić, M. (1975) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00856a001 · Cited by 3,664
Substituent constants for correlation analysis in chemistry and biology
Hansch, C. H., & Leo, A. J. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,910
Molecular Connectivity in Chemistry and Drug Research
(1976) · Medicinal chemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-406560-4.x5001-6 · Cited by 1,628
Sachs, L. (1984) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5246-7 · Cited by 1,016
Graph theory and molecular orbitals. XII. Acyclic polyenes
Gutman, İ., ić, B. R., Trinajstić, N., & WILCOX, C. F. J. (1975) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.430994 · Cited by 829
Molecular Structure Description: The Electrotopological State
Kier, L. B., & Hall, L. H. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 467
Zheng, W., & Tropsha, A. (1999) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci980033m · Cited by 450
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- S. Clementi, S. Wold, How to choose the proper statistical method, in: H. van de Waterbeemd (Ed.), Chemometrics Methods in Molecular Design, VCH, Weinheim, 1995, pp. 319–338.
- S. Wold, PLS for multivariate linear modeling, in: H. van de Waterbeemd (Ed.), Chemometrics Methods in Molecular Design, VCH, Weinheim, 1995, pp. 195–218.
- L.B. Kier, L.H. Hall, Molecular Connectivity in Structure–Activity Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1986.
- D. Bonchev, Overall connectivity and molecular complexity, in: J. Devillers, A.T. Balaban (Eds.), Topological Indices and Related Descriptors, Gordon and Breach, Reading, UK, 1999, pp. 361–401.
- R.D. Clark, D.G. Sprous, J.M. Leonard, Validating models based on large dataset, in: H.-D. Höltje, W. Sippl (Eds.), Rational Approaches to Drug Design. Proceedings of the 13th European Symposium on Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships, Prous Sci., 2001, 475–485.
- A. Golbraikh, D. Bonchev, Y.-D. Xiao, A. Tropsha, Novel chiral topological descriptors and their applications to QSAR, in: H.-D. Höltje, W. Sippl (Eds.), Rational Approaches to Drug Design. Proceedings of the 13th European Symposium on Quantitative Structure–Activity relationships, Aug. 27–Sept. 1, 2000, Duesseldorf, Germany, Prous Science, 2001, 219–223.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,004
Data-driven modelling of the flocculation process on mineral processing tailings treatment
Qi, C., Fourie, A. B., Chen, Q., Tang, X., Zhang, Q., & Gao, R. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.054 · Cited by 64
Tariq, R., Cetina-Quiñones, A. J., Cardoso-Fernández, V., Daniela-Abigail, H.-L., Soberanis, M. A. E., Bassam, A., & Lille, M. V. D. (2021) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101561 · Cited by 68
Masand, V. H., Mahajan, D. T., Nazeruddin, G. M., Hadda, T. B., Rastija, V., & Alfeefy, A. M. (2014) · Medicinal Chemistry Research · doi:10.1007/s00044-014-1193-8 · Cited by 64
Darnag, R., Mazouz, E. L. M., Schmitzer, A. R., Villemin, D., Jarid, A., & Cherqaoui, D. (2010) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.01.002 · Cited by 66
Generation of in-silico cytochrome P450 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4 inhibition QSAR models
Gleeson, M. P., Davis, A. M., Chohan, K. K., Paine, S. W., Boyer, S. K., Gavaghan, C. L., Arnby, C. H., Kankkonen, C., & Albertson, N. H. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-007-9139-6 · Cited by 64
Abdel‐Aziz, A. A. ‐., Asiri, Y. A., & Al-Agamy, M. H. (2011) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.09.011 · Cited by 64
Hamadache, M., Benkortbi, O., Hanini, S., & Amrane, A. (2017) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-017-0498-9 · Cited by 66
Prediction of riprap stone size under overtopping flow using data-driven models
Najafzadeh, M., Rezaie-Balf, M., & Tafarojnoruz, A. (2018) · International Journal of River Basin Management · doi:10.1080/15715124.2018.1437738 · Cited by 64
“Golbraikh and Tropsha (2002) and Tropsha et al. (2003) suggested an external validation criterion to evaluate the models on the basis of their performance through analysis of data subsets.”
BackgroundKhan, K., Baderna, D., Cappelli, C., Toma, C., Lombardo, A., Roy, K., & Benfenati, E. (2019) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2019.05.011 · Cited by 64
The Characterisation of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships: Preliminary Guidance
Worth, A., Bassan, A., Gallegos, A. F., Ti, N., Patlewicz, G. Y., Pavan, M., Tsakovska, I., & Vračko, M. (2005) · Cited by 64
Marrero‐Ponce, Y., Montero, A., Romero‐Zaldivar, C., Veitía, M. S., Peréz, M. M., & García–Sánchez, R. N. (2004) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2004.11.008 · Cited by 64
Khosravikia, F., Clayton, P. M., & Nagy, Z. (2018) · Seismological Research Letters · doi:10.1785/0220180218 · Cited by 63
“Moreover, Golbraikh and Tropsha (2002) suggested that at least one of the slopes of the regression of targets against estimates through the origin and that of estimates against targets through the origin for the testing subset (k and k′, respectively) should be between 0.85 and 1.15.”
BackgroundInfluentialFlocculation-dewatering prediction of fine mineral tailings using a hybrid machine learning approach
Qi, C., Ly, H., Chen, Q., Le, T.-T., Le, M. V., & Pham, B. T. (2019) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125450 · Cited by 63
Buglak, A. A., Filatov, M. A., Hussain, M. A., & Sugimoto, M. (2020) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112833 · Cited by 65
Zhang, W., Khan, A. M., Huyan, J., Zhong, J., Peng, T., & Cheng, H. (2021) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124924 · Cited by 63
Zhou, P., Li, W., Lin, J., Mei, L., Liu, Q., Shang, S., Li, J., & Shu, J. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac097 · Cited by 63
Zhu, Z., Rahman, Z.-U., Aamir, M., Shah, S. Z. A., Hamid, S., Bilawal, A., Li, S., & Ishfaq, M. (2023) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d2ra06178c · Cited by 63
Lapins, M., & Wikberg, J. E. S. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-339 · Cited by 66
“However, some studies have pointed out that Q2 may give an overly optimistic assessment of model performance in the case that the crossvalidation results are used to optimize model parameters or to select the best among many alternative models [49,50].”
BackgroundJalali‐Heravi, M., & Kyani, A. (2007) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2006.12.020 · Cited by 63
Quantitative online prediction of peptide binding to the major histocompatibility complex
Hattotuwagama, C. K., Guan, P., Doytchinova, I. A., Zygouri, C., & Flower, D. R. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/s1093-3263(03)00160-8 · Cited by 63
A novel descriptor of amino acids and its application in peptide QSAR
Tong, J., Liu, S., Zhou, P., Wu, B., & Li, Z. (2008) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.030 · Cited by 63
Safarizadeh, H., & Garkani‐Nejad, Z. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2018.11.019 · Cited by 61
Kumar, S., Kumar, R., Rai, B., & Samui, P. (2024) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136933 · Cited by 69
Gene expression programming as a basis for new generation of electricity demand prediction models
Mousavi, S. M., Mostafavi, E. S., & Hosseinpour, F. (2014) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2014.05.010 · Cited by 62
“Besides, new criteria recommended by Golbraikh and Tropsha (2002) were checked for external validation of the models on the validation data sets.”
MethodA Large‐Scale Empirical Evaluation of Cross‐Validation and External Test Set Validation in (Q)SAR
Gütlein, M., Helma, C., Karwath, A., & Krämer, S. (2013) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201200134 · Cited by 63
Zhou, P., Tian, F., Chen, X., & Shang, Z. (2008) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.21091 · Cited by 63
Chen, J., Luo, Y., Wei, C., Wu, S., Wu, R., Wang, S., Hu, D., & Song, B. (2020) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.5873 · Cited by 62
Machine learning-based constitutive models for cement-grouted coal specimens under shearing
Li, G., Sun, Y., & Qi, C. (2021) · International Journal of Mining Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.08.005 · Cited by 61
Ilyas, I., Zafar, A., Afzal, M., Javed, M. F., Alrowais, R., Althoey, F., Mohamed, A. M., Mohamed, A., & Vatin, N. I. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14091789 · Cited by 61
“934 (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002) [88] MLR 0.”
Darnag, R., Minaoui, B., & Fakir, M. (2012) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.10.021 · Cited by 61
“Though there is no rigorous rule to rely on (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002), a practical way is to use a ratio, q, to determine the number of hidden units (Andrea and Kalayeh, 1991). q is defined as the following: q ¼ number of compounds presented to the network number of connections in the network…”
BackgroundMethodRoy, K. K., Dixit, A., & Saxena, A. K. (2008) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2008.04.006 · Cited by 61
Chagas‐Paula, D. A., Oliveira, T. B., Zhang, T., Edrada‐Ebel, R., & Costa, F. B. D. (2015) · Planta Medica · doi:10.1055/s-0034-1396206 · Cited by 61
Shahlaei, M., Sabet, R., Ziari, M. B., Moeinifard, B., Fassihi, A., & Karbakhsh, R. (2010) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.07.010 · Cited by 61
SMILES-based QSAR model for arylpiperazines as high-affinity 5-HT1A receptor ligands using CORAL
Veselinović, A. M., Milosavljević, J. B., Toropov, A. A., & Nikolić, G. M. (2012) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2012.12.021 · Cited by 61
The applications of PCA in QSAR studies: A case study on CCR5 antagonists
Yoo, C., & Shahlaei, M. (2017) · Chemical Biology & Drug Design · doi:10.1111/cbdd.13064 · Cited by 61
Eidgahee, D. R., Rafiean, A. H., & Haddad, A. (2019) · Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transactions of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s40996-019-00263-1 · Cited by 61
Kumar, P. P., & Kumar, A. (2020) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.103982 · Cited by 61
Clark, R. D. (2003) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1023/a:1025366721142 · Cited by 61
Predicting the Biological Activities Through QSAR Analysis and Docking-Based Scoring
Vilar, S., & Costanzi, S. (2012) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-023-6_16 · Cited by 60
Saı́z-Urra, L., González, M. P., & Teijeira, M. (2006) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2006.05.081 · Cited by 59
QSAR analysis on tacrine-related acetylcholinesterase inhibitors
Wong, K. Y., Mercader, A. G., Saavedra, L. M., Honarparvar, B., Romanelli, G. P., & Duchowicz, P. R. (2014) · Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1186/s12929-014-0084-0 · Cited by 60
“50 for obtaining a validated model [54].”
Kumar, M. C., Ramasamy, K., Mani, V., Mishra, R. K., Majeed, A. B. A., Clercq, E. D., & Narasimhan, B. (2012) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.12.005 · Cited by 60
“The value of q2 greater than 0.5 is the basic requirement for qualifying aQSARmodel to be valid (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialQin, L., Liu, S., Liu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2009) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.10.029 · Cited by 60
Liang, G., & Li, Z. (2007) · QSAR & Combinatorial Science · doi:10.1002/qsar.200630145 · Cited by 60
Prediction of the self-accelerating decomposition temperature of organic peroxides using QSPR models
Wang, B., Yi, H., Xu, K., & Wang, Q. (2016) · Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry · doi:10.1007/s10973-016-5922-8 · Cited by 60
Amin, S. A., Bhargava, S., Adhikari, N., Gayen, S., & Jha, T. (2017) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2017.1288659 · Cited by 59
“By carrying out the whole process of Monte Carlo optimization, one can get a suitable model and the best model was selected on the basis of Golbraikh and Tropsha criterion (Golbraikh & Tropsha, 2002).”
MethodSharma, S. K., Kumar, P., Narasimhan, B., Ramasamy, K., Mani, V., Mishra, R. K., & Majeed, A. B. A. (2011) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.11.028 · Cited by 59
García, J., Duchowicz, P. R., Rozas, M. F., Caram, J. A., Mirífico, M. V., Fernández, F. M., & Castro, E. A. (2011) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2011.07.007 · Cited by 59
Technique for Energy Decomposition in the Study of “Receptor-Ligand” Complexes
Potemkin, V., Pogrebnoy, A. A., & Grishina, M. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci800405n · Cited by 59
CRAMER, R. D. I., Cruz, P., Stahl, G., Curtiss, W. C., Campbell, B., Masek, B. B., & Soltanshahi, F. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci8001556 · Cited by 59
Predictive QSAR workflow for the in silico identification and screening of novel HDAC inhibitors
Melagraki, G., Afantitis, A., Sarimveis, H., Koutentis, P. A., Kollias, G. A., & Igglessi‐Markopoulou, O. (2009) · Molecular Diversity · doi:10.1007/s11030-009-9115-2 · Cited by 60
“To illustrate this, the following evaluation techniques were used: the leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation procedure, validation through an external test set and Y-randomization [49–53].”
MethodAdhikari, N., Halder, A. K., Mallick, S., Saha, A., Saha, K. D., & Jha, T. (2016) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2016.07.023 · Cited by 59
Lin, W., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Wu, R., Yang, H., Hu, X., & Ling, X. (2017) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2017.05.003 · Cited by 59
“Besides, permutation testing was performed to validate the classification models (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002).”
QSPR Modeling of the Refractive Index for Diverse Polymers Using 2D Descriptors
Khan, P. M., Rasulev, B., & Roy, K. (2018) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.8b01834 · Cited by 59
“The fi nally selected models were satisfactory in terms of all of the internal as well as external validation metrics including mean absolute error (MAE)-based criteria 51 and Golbraikh and Tropsha ’ s criteria, 52 proving the signi fi cance of the models.”
Pourdaryaei, A., Mokhlis, H., Illias, H. A., Kaboli, S. H. A., Ahmad, S., & Ang, S. P. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2938842 · Cited by 59
“To evaluate the performance of the developed model, following attributes are recommended [36-39]: I.”
MethodNew tyrosinase inhibitors selected by atomic linear indices-based classification models
Casañola‐Martín, G. M., Khan, M. T. H., Marrero‐Ponce, Y., Ather, A., Sultankhodzhaev, M. N., & Torrens, F. (2005) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.09.085 · Cited by 58
Assiri, E. H. E., Driouch, M., Lazrak, J., Bensouda, Z., Elhaloui, A., Sfaira, M., Saffaj, T., & Taleb, M. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05067 · Cited by 58
fadili, M. E., Er-rajy, M., Imtara, H., Kara, M., Zarougui, S., Altwaijry, N., Kamaly, O. M. A., Alsfouk, A. A., & Elhallaoui, M. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10081462 · Cited by 60
Forecasting energy demand of PCM integrated residential buildings: A machine learning approach
Zhussupbekov, M., Memon, S. A., Khawaja, S. A., Nazir, K., & Kim, J. R. (2023) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106335 · Cited by 58
Kleinekorte, J., Kleppich, J., Fleitmann, L., Beckert, V., Blodau, L., & Bardow, A. (2023) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c07682 · Cited by 64
Farmanesh, P., Dehkordi, N. S., Vehbi, A., & Chavali, K. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17052162 · Cited by 58
Koirala, M., Yan, L., Mohamed, Z., & DiPaola, M. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26199384 · Cited by 78
The use of machine learning and nonlinear statistical tools for ADME prediction
Sakiyama, Y. (2009) · Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology · doi:10.1517/17425250902753261 · Cited by 59
“So far, there have been several arguments regarding the mismatch between the predictive ability of cross validation versus external validation [56-58] .”
BackgroundPérez, A., Helguera, A. M., Borges, F., Cordeiro, M. N. D. S., Rivero‐Buceta, V., & Escudero, A. G. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci2003076 · Cited by 58
Is regression through origin useful in external validation of QSAR models?
Shayanfar, A., & Shayanfar, S. (2014) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2014.03.007 · Cited by 58
Afantitis, A., Melagraki, G., Sarimveis, H., Koutentis, P. A., Markopoulos, J., & Igglessi‐Markopoulou, O. (2006) · Molecular Diversity · doi:10.1007/s11030-005-9012-2 · Cited by 58
“[18, 19] considered a QSAR model predictive, if the following conditions are satisfied:”
BackgroundContrera, J. F., Matthews, E. J., Kruhlak, N. L., & Benz, R. D. (2005) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.09.001 · Cited by 58
“External validation is considered the best means for determining the predictive power and reliability of a QSAR model (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002; Perkins et al., 2003).”
MethodAsadollahi, T., Dadfarnia, S., Shabani, A. M. H., Ghasemi, J. B., & Sarkhosh, M. (2011) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules16031928 · Cited by 58
“It should be noted that even when there is no correlation between the LOO- cross-validated R(2) (Q(2)) and regression coefficient R(2) for a predictive set with known values of biological activities, the validated model can be used for predicting activities/ properties of new chemicals [33,36].”
BackgroundMethodPatel, Y., Gillet, V. J., Howe, T. J., Pastor, J., Oyarzábal, J., & Willett, P. (2008) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm801070q · Cited by 58
Identification of ischemic heart disease via machine learning analysis on magnetocardiograms
Tantimongcolwat, T., Naenna, T., Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya, C., Embrechts, M. J., & Prachayasittikul, V. (2008) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2008.04.009 · Cited by 57
“The results are similar to the quality of classification as achieved by the trained expert [38–40].”
ResultMali, S. N., Pandey, A., Bhandare, R. R., & SHAIK, A. B. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20325-1 · Cited by 58
Khan, M., Nassar, R., Khan, A. U., Houda, M., Hachem, C. E., Rasheed, M., & Anwar, W. (2023) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101625 · Cited by 57
Lü, P., Wei, X., & Zhang, R. (2010) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.04.030 · Cited by 57
Chen, Y., Cai, X., Jiang, L. K., & Li, Y. (2015) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.10.024 · Cited by 57
Wolfer, A. M., Lozano, S., Umbdenstock, T., Croixmarie, V., Arrault, A., & Vayer, P. (2015) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-015-0888-2 · Cited by 57
Ben‐Shalom, I., Pfeiffer‐Marek, S., Baringhaus, K. H., & Gohlke, H. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00373 · Cited by 59
Hossain, K. A., & Roy, K. (2018) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.09.068 · Cited by 57
Khalaf, T. Z., Çağlar, H., Çağlar, A., & Hanoon, A. N. (2020) · Civil Engineering Journal · doi:10.28991/cej-2020-03091478 · Cited by 57
“The criteria suggested by Golbraikh et al. (2002) [28] were checked for the external verification of the proposed models on the testing datasets.”
BackgroundYe, Z.-R., Huang, I.-S., Chan, Y.-T., Li, Z.-J., Liao, C.-C., Tsai, H.-R., Hsieh, M.-C., Chang, C., & Tsai, M. (2020) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d0ra05014h · Cited by 54
Saı́z-Urra, L., González, M. P., Fall, Y., & Gómez, G. (2006) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2006.08.005 · Cited by 58
Xie, W., Liu, Z., Fang, D., Wu, W., Ma, S., Tan, S., & Zheng, K. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.02.071 · Cited by 56
Awan, H. H., Hussain, A., Javed, M. F., Qiu, Y., Alrowais, R., Mohamed, A. M., Fathi, D. M., & Alzahrani, A. M. Y. (2022) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings12030314 · Cited by 56
“The slopes of the regression li es (k or k′) running from the origin have been suggested to be close to one [81].”
BackgroundBanerjee, A., Kar, S., Pore, S., & Roy, K. (2023) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.1080/17435390.2023.2186280 · Cited by 56
“It is essential to note that both models passed the prescribed limits of the Golbraikh and Tropsha ’ s criteria (Golbraikh and Tropsha 2002) (Table 4).”
MethodInfluentialBahmed, I. T., Khatti, J., & Grover, K. S. (2024) · Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10064-023-03537-1 · Cited by 56
“The Golbraikh and Tropsha (2002) theory, which was proposed, is an accurate model in this investigation.”
Correlation between the glass transition temperatures and multipole moments for polymers
Yu, X., Yi, B., Wang, X., & Xie, Z. (2006) · Chemical Physics · doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2006.11.029 · Cited by 56
Prediction of drug intestinal absorption by new linear and non-linear QSPR
Talevi, A., Goodarzi, M., Ortiz, E. V., Duchowicz, P. R., Bellera, C. L., Pesce, G. O., Castro, E. A., & Bruno‐Blanch, L. E. (2010) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.11.005 · Cited by 55
Casañola‐Martín, G. M., Marrero‐Ponce, Y., Khan, M. T. H., Ather, A., Khan, K. M., Torrens, F., & Rotondo, R. (2007) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2007.01.026 · Cited by 56
Marrero‐Ponce, Y., Cabrera‐Pérez, M. Á., Zaldívar, V. R., Ofori, E., & Montero, L. A. (2003) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/i4080512 · Cited by 56
Aguiar, A. C. C., Panciera, M., dos Santos, E. F. S., Singh, M. K., Garcia, M. L., de Souza, G., Nakabashi, M., Costa, J. L., Garcia, C. R. S., Oliva, G., et al. (2018) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00143 · Cited by 56
Hao, Y., Sun, G., Fan, T., Sun, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, N., Zhao, L., Zhong, R., & Peng, Y. (2019) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109822 · Cited by 58
Hao, Y., Sun, G., Fan, T., Tang, X., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, N., Zhao, L., Zhong, R., & Peng, Y. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122981 · Cited by 56
Pasqualoto, K. F. M., Ferreira, E. I., Santos‐Filho, O. A., & Hopfinger, A. J. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm049913k · Cited by 56
Gui, B., Xu, X., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., Li, C., Zhang, D., Su, L., & Zhao, Y. H. (2021) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.111001 · Cited by 55
A comparison between 2D and 3D descriptors in QSAR modeling based on bio‐active conformations
Bahia, M. S., Kaspi, O., Touitou, M., Binayev, I., Dhail, S., Spiegel, J. D., Khazanov, N., Yosipof, A., & Senderowitz, H. (2023) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.202200186 · Cited by 61
Taladriz‐Sender, A., Healy, A. R., Pérez, E. J. F., Herrero, V., Martínez, C. R., Alkhaldi, A. A. M., Eze, A. A., Kaiser, M., de Koning, H. P., Chana, A., et al. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm2014259 · Cited by 55
Artemenko, A. G., Muratov, E. N., Kuz’min, V. Е., MURATOV, N. N., Varlamova, E. V., Kuz’mina, A. V., Gorb, L., Golius, A., Hill, F. C., Leszczyński, J., et al. (2011) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/1062936x.2011.569950 · Cited by 55
“This approach allows us to minimize the dependence of the predictivity estimation on the test set compounds selection, although subsequent external validation on an independent test set is still highly desirable [46,49,58,59].”
Self-citationQSAR prediction of inhibition of aldose reductase for flavonoids
Mercader, A. G., Duchowicz, P. R., Fernández, F. M., Castro, E. A., Bennardi, D. O., Autino, J. C., & Romanelli, G. P. (2008) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2008.06.004 · Cited by 55
Delgado, L. F., Charles, P., Glucina, K., & Morlay, C. (2012) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.08.016 · Cited by 55
A novel approach to predict aquatic toxicity from molecular structure
Castillo‐Garit, J. A., Marrero‐Ponce, Y., Escobar, J., Torrens, F., & Rotondo, R. (2008) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.05.024 · Cited by 55
“Efforts should be made to have chemical diversity within the training set and the chemicals in the validation set similar to those in the training set (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002).”
BackgroundResultOntology of core data mining entities
Panov, P., Soldatova, L., & Džeroski, S. (2014) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-014-0363-0 · Cited by 56
“Experimental validation of QSAR predictive models is very rare (Golbraikh and Tropsha 2002).”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Golbraikh, A., & Tropsha, A.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tropsha, Alexander
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 269-276
- ISSN
- 1093-3263 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087661061
- Cited by
- 3,735
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 133 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 179 · 2023: 174 · 2022: 194 · 2021: 197 · 2020: 215 · 2019: 189 · 2018: 200 · 2017: 174 · 2016: 181 · 2015: 175 · 2014: 197 · 2013: 203 · 2012: 202
- FWCI
- 52.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- leave-one-out cross-validation, QSAR model validation, predictive power, external validation, 2D molecular descriptors, overfitting, model evaluation metrics
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Ligands, Mathematical Computing, Models, Molecular, Receptors, Histamine H1, Steroids, Transcortin, Databases, Factual, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Ecdysteroids
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review