The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beware of q2!
Abstract
Validation is a crucial aspect of any quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling. This paper examines one of the most popular validation criteria, leave-one-out cross-validated R2 (LOO q2). Often, a high value of this statistical characteristic (q2 > 0.5) is considered as a proof of the high predictive ability of the model. In this paper, we show that this assumption is generally incorrect. In the case of 3D QSAR, the lack of the correlation between the high LOO q2 and the high predictive ability of a QSAR model has been established earlier [Pharm. Acta Helv. 70 (1995) 149; J. Chemomet. 10(1996)95; J. Med. Chem. 41 (1998) 2553]. In this paper, we use two-dimensional (2D) molecular descriptors and k nearest neighbors (kNN) QSAR method for the analysis of several datasets. No correlation between the values of q2 for the training set and predictive ability for the test set was found for any of the datasets. Thus, the high value of LOO q2 appears to be the necessary but not the sufficient condition for the model to have a high predictive power. We argue that this is the general property of QSAR models developed using LOO cross-validation. We emphasize that the external validation is the only way to establish a reliable QSAR model. We formulate a set of criteria for evaluation of predictive ability of QSAR models.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Importantly, QSAR modeling was one of the first research fields that highlighted the importance of data curation,13 rigorous validation of developed models,14 and data reproducibility,15 that has recently become a significant concern to the scientific community.16”
From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Similarly, rigorous model validation prior to prediction14 and the importance of rigor in modeling protocols291 have been articulated in several seminal publications in QSAR field292 and have already been adopted as regulatory requirements.84”
From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
Harary, F. (1969) · Cited by 10,739
Structural Determination of Paraffin Boiling Points
Wiener, H. (1947) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01193a005 · Cited by 4,184
Cramer, R. D., Patterson, D. E., & Bunce, J. D. (1988) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00226a005 · Cited by 3,931
Characterization of molecular branching
Randić, M. (1975) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00856a001 · Cited by 3,664
Substituent constants for correlation analysis in chemistry and biology
Hansch, C. H., & Leo, A. J. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,910
Molecular Connectivity in Chemistry and Drug Research
(1976) · Medicinal chemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-406560-4.x5001-6 · Cited by 1,628
Sachs, L. (1984) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5246-7 · Cited by 1,016
Graph theory and molecular orbitals. XII. Acyclic polyenes
Gutman, İ., ić, B. R., Trinajstić, N., & WILCOX, C. F. J. (1975) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.430994 · Cited by 829
Molecular Structure Description: The Electrotopological State
Kier, L. B., & Hall, L. H. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 467
Zheng, W., & Tropsha, A. (1999) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci980033m · Cited by 450
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- S. Clementi, S. Wold, How to choose the proper statistical method, in: H. van de Waterbeemd (Ed.), Chemometrics Methods in Molecular Design, VCH, Weinheim, 1995, pp. 319–338.
- S. Wold, PLS for multivariate linear modeling, in: H. van de Waterbeemd (Ed.), Chemometrics Methods in Molecular Design, VCH, Weinheim, 1995, pp. 195–218.
- L.B. Kier, L.H. Hall, Molecular Connectivity in Structure–Activity Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1986.
- D. Bonchev, Overall connectivity and molecular complexity, in: J. Devillers, A.T. Balaban (Eds.), Topological Indices and Related Descriptors, Gordon and Breach, Reading, UK, 1999, pp. 361–401.
- R.D. Clark, D.G. Sprous, J.M. Leonard, Validating models based on large dataset, in: H.-D. Höltje, W. Sippl (Eds.), Rational Approaches to Drug Design. Proceedings of the 13th European Symposium on Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships, Prous Sci., 2001, 475–485.
- A. Golbraikh, D. Bonchev, Y.-D. Xiao, A. Tropsha, Novel chiral topological descriptors and their applications to QSAR, in: H.-D. Höltje, W. Sippl (Eds.), Rational Approaches to Drug Design. Proceedings of the 13th European Symposium on Quantitative Structure–Activity relationships, Aug. 27–Sept. 1, 2000, Duesseldorf, Germany, Prous Science, 2001, 219–223.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,004
Caballero, J., Fernández, M., & González-Nilo, F. D. (2008) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2008.04.048 · Cited by 35
El‐Azab, A. S., Alanazi, A. M., Abdel-Aziz, N. I., Al-Suwaidan, I. A., El‐Sayed, M. A. ‐., El‐Sherbeny, M. A., & Abdel‐Aziz, A. A. ‐. (2012) · Medicinal Chemistry Research · doi:10.1007/s00044-012-0230-8 · Cited by 34
“However, a QSAR model is considered to be predictive, if the following conditions are satisfied: r2 [ 0.6, q2 [ 0.6, and pred_r2 [ 0.5 (AbdelAziz et al., 2011a, b, c; Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002].”
BackgroundInfluentialDrabczyńska, A., Yuzlenko, O., Köse, M., Paskaleva, M., Schiedel, A. C., Janina Karolak-wojciechowska, A., Handzlik, J., Karcz, T. P., Kuder, K., Müller, C. E., et al. (2011) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.05.023 · Cited by 34
Garg, A., Tewari, R., & Raghava, G. P. S. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-125 · Cited by 34
“Ideally, a regression model with n training set compounds and k descriptors may be acceptable only if n > 4 k and for any of the k descriptors-i) the significance level p is < 0.05; ii) the pair-wise correlation coefficient should be < 0.9 [24,25].”
BackgroundInfluentialBenchmarking Variable Selection in QSAR
Eklund, M., Norinder, U., Boyer, S. K., & Carlsson, L. (2012) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201100142 · Cited by 35
Liu, G., Wang, W., Wan, Y., Ju, X.-L., & Gu, S. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19051436 · Cited by 34
Schefzick, S., Kibbey, C., & Bradley, M. P. (2004) · Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry · doi:10.1021/cc049914y · Cited by 34
TMACC: Interpretable Correlation Descriptors for Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationships
Melville, J. L., & Hirst, J. D. (2007) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci6004178 · Cited by 35
Chen, J., Li, X., Yu, H., Wang, Y., & Qiao, X. (2008) · Science China Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s11426-008-0076-6 · Cited by 34
Design, syntheses and evaluation of 4-oxo-5-cyano thiouracils as SecA inhibitors.
Chaudhary, A. S., Jin, J., Chen, W., Tai, P. C., & Wang, B. (2015) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2014.11.017 · Cited by 31
Edache, E. I., Uzairu, A., Mamza, P. A., & Shallangwa, G. A. (2021) · Scientific African · doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e01088 · Cited by 36
Alaskar, A. M., Alfalah, G., Althoey, F., Abuhussain, M. A., Javed, M. F., Deifalla, A. F., & Ghamry, N. A. (2023) · Case Studies in Construction Materials · doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02199 · Cited by 33
Khan, M., Ali, M., Najeh, T., & Gamil, Y. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-56088-0 · Cited by 33
Kulumkanov, N., Memon, S. A., & Khawaja, S. A. (2024) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109413 · Cited by 33
Nawaz, M. N., Akhtar, A. Y., Awan, T. A., Nawaz, M. M., Qamar, S. U., Shehzad, T., Hassan, W., Khan, S. R., & Farooq, R. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108660 · Cited by 33
Qin, L., Zhang, J.-Y., Nong, Q.-Y., Xu, X.-C.-L., Zeng, H., Liang, Y., & Mo, L. (2024) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124565 · Cited by 33
Rhabori, S. E., Alaqarbeh, M., Allouche, Y. E., Naanaai, L., Aissouq, A. E., Bouachrıne, M., Chtita, S., & Khalil, F. (2024) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.139500 · Cited by 34
Tóth, G., Bodai, Z., & Héberger, K. (2013) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-013-9680-4 · Cited by 34
Chemometric model for predicting retention indices of constituents of essential oils
Qin, L., Liu, S., Chen, F., Xiao, Q., & Wu, Q. (2012) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.07.010 · Cited by 33
Toropov, A. A., Toropova, A. P., Raška, I., Benfenati, E., & Gini, G. C. (2012) · Structural Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s11224-012-9995-0 · Cited by 33
Introducing new dimensions in MIA-QSAR: A case for chemokine receptor inhibitors
Nunes, C. A., & Freitas, M. P. (2013) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.01.005 · Cited by 33
Politi, R., Rusyn, I., & Tropsha, A. (2014) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2014.07.009 · Cited by 34
“Y-randomization was applied to all training/test dataset divisions considered in this study following protocols as described previously (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002).”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationA Structure-Affinity and Comparative Molecular Field Analysis of Sigma-2 (σ2) Receptor Ligands
Abate, C., Mosier, P. D., Berardi, F., & Glennon, R. A. (2009) · Central Nervous System Agents in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/1871524910909030246 · Cited by 33
“by the q(2) statistic, can be misleading [17, 18] and that a high q(2) value does not guarantee that the model will be able to generalize.”
BackgroundRoy, K., & Roy, P. P. (2009) · Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology · doi:10.1517/17425250903158940 · Cited by 33
“However, it is now being accepted that validation is a more holistic process that includes assessment of issues such as data quality, applicability of the model and mechanistic interpretability in addition to statistical assessment [165-172].”
BackgroundKeshavarz, M. H., Jafari, M., Kamalvand, M., Karami, A., Keshavarz, Z., Zamani, A., & Rajaee, S. (2016) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2016.01.018 · Cited by 33
QSAR Study of H1N1 Neuraminidase Inhibitors from Influenza a Virus
Worachartcheewan, A., Nantasenamat, C., Isarankura‐Na‐Ayudhya, C., & Prachayasittikul, V. (2014) · Letters in Drug Design & Discovery · doi:10.2174/15701808113106660085 · Cited by 33
“[44] described the predictive potential of models to be char-”
BackgroundMerchak, N., Silvestre, V., Loquet, D., Rizk, T., Akoka, S., & Bejjani, J. (2016) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-016-0005-z · Cited by 33
Studies of the benzopyran class of selective COX-2 inhibitors using 3D-QSAR and molecular docking
Yadav, D. K., Saloni, S., Sharma, P., Misra, S., Singh, H., Mancera, R. L., Kim, K., Jang, C., Kim, M., Pérez‐Sánchez, H., et al. (2017) · Archives of Pharmacal Research · doi:10.1007/s12272-017-0945-7 · Cited by 33
Adedirin, O., Uzairu, A., Shallangwa, G. A., & Abechi, S. E. (2018) · Journal of King Saud University - Science · doi:10.1016/j.jksus.2018.02.009 · Cited by 33
Aouidate, A., Ghaleb, A., Ghamali, M., Chtita, S., Ousaa, A., Choukrad, M., Sbai, A., Bouachrıne, M., & Lakhlifi, T. (2018) · Structural Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s11224-018-1086-4 · Cited by 33
“Thus, a true and trustworthy model should be able to predict a precise activity in the external test set [29].”
BackgroundMethodLawrenson, A. S., Cooper, D. L., O’Neill, P. M., & Berry, N. G. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-018-3755-z · Cited by 33
Sadrossadat, E., Ghorbani, B., Oskooei, P. R., & Kaboutari, M. (2018) · Engineering Computations · doi:10.1108/ec-07-2017-0258 · Cited by 33
Sun, H., Chen, R., Jiang, W., Chen, X., & Lin, Z. (2019) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.03.020 · Cited by 33
Hadni, H., & Elhallaoui, M. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02357 · Cited by 33
“The study conducted by Golbraikh and Tropsha on validation methods lead to the insufficient of the internal validation methods to confirm the reliability of the built QSAR models.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialTzuc, O. M., Livas-García, A., Torres, M. J., May, E. C., López-Manrique, L. M., & Bassam, A. (2020) · Journal of Energy Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)ey.1943-7897.0000649 · Cited by 35
Wang, L.-L., Ding, J., Li, P., Fu, L., Tian, J.-H., Cao, D., Jiang, H., & Ding, X. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123724 · Cited by 32
Kumar, P. P., & Kumar, A. (2020) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/1062936x.2020.1806105 · Cited by 33
Abdizadeh, R., Heidarian, E., Hadizadeh, F., & Abdizadeh, T. (2020) · Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2020.08.028 · Cited by 33
The History and Development of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs)
Dearden, J. C. (2016) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0549-5.ch003 · Cited by 34
Daghighi, A., Casañola‐Martín, G. M., Timmerman, T., Milenković, D., Lučić, B., & Rasulev, B. (2022) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics10120746 · Cited by 33
“Here k, k′ are the slopes of the regression lines and should to be close to 1 [40].”
BackgroundComputational Analysis of Structure–Activity Relationships
Gedeck, P., Krämer, C., & Ertl, P. (2010) · Progress in medicinal chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0079-6468(10)49004-9 · Cited by 35
QSTR modelling of the acute toxicity of pharmaceuticals to fish
Tugcu, G., Saçan, M. T., Vračko, M., Novič, M., & Minovski, N. (2012) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/1062936x.2012.657678 · Cited by 33
“The presented model was subjected to the test for the criteria of external validation as recommended by Golbraikh and Tropsha [35].”
MethodInfluentialPiazza, L., Gigli, J., & Ballabio, D. (2006) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.08.005 · Cited by 33
On the use of PLS and N-PLS in MIA-QSAR: Azole antifungals
Goodarzi, M., & Freitas, M. P. (2008) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2008.11.007 · Cited by 33
Jin, H., Wang, C., Shi, J., & Chen, L. (2014) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.068 · Cited by 33
Cui, Y.-H., Chen, J., Xu, T., & Tian, H. (2015) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2015.01.001 · Cited by 32
Caballero, J., Tundidor‐Camba, A., & Fernández, M. (2006) · QSAR & Combinatorial Science · doi:10.1002/qsar.200610001 · Cited by 33
Gunturi, S. B., & Ramamurthi, N. (2007) · QSAR & Combinatorial Science · doi:10.1002/qsar.200630094 · Cited by 33
Gadhe, C. G., Kothandan, G., & Cho, S. J. (2012) · Molecular Simulation · doi:10.1080/08927022.2012.659182 · Cited by 33
“training set is used to build a model, and then the model is applied to remaining test set to verify the model’s predictability [17].”
MethodGeneral Linearized Biexponential Model for QSAR Data Showing Bilinear-Type Distribution
Buchwald, P. (2005) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.20438 · Cited by 33
Kraker, J. J., Hawkins, D. M., Basak, S. C., Natarajan, R., & Mills, D. R. (2006) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.03.001 · Cited by 33
Structural Parameter Characterization and Bioactivity Simulation Based on Peptide Sequence
Shu, M., Hu, M. Y., Yang, S., Liao, L., & Li, Z. (2008) · QSAR & Combinatorial Science · doi:10.1002/qsar.200710169 · Cited by 33
Prediction of Serum Adsorption onto Polymer Brush Films by Machine Learning
Palai, D., Tahara, H., Chikami, S., Latag, G. V., Maeda, S., Komura, C., Kurioka, H., & Hayashi, T. (2022) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00441 · Cited by 32
Wang, Y., Wang, P., Fan, T., Ren, T., Zhang, N., Zhao, L., Zhong, R., & Sun, G. (2024) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134945 · Cited by 32
Successful “In Silico” Design of New Efficient Uranyl Binders
Varnek, A. A., Fourches, D., Solov’ev, V. P., Klimchuk, O., Ouadi, A., & Billard, I. (2007) · Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange · doi:10.1080/07366290701415820 · Cited by 32
“Here, for the models selection at the training stage we used the recommendation of Goldbraich and Tropsha:[23] squared correlation coefficient R2 .”
MethodIzadiyan, P., Fatemi, M. H., & Izadiyan, M. (2012) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.10.005 · Cited by 32
Nargotra, A., Koul, S., Sharma, S., Khan, I. A., Kumar, A., Thota, N., Koul, J. L., Taneja, S. C., & Qazi, G. N. (2008) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.02.015 · Cited by 33
MQSPR modeling in materials informatics: a way to shorten design cycles?
Sukumar, N., Krein, M. P., Luo, Q., & Breneman, C. M. (2012) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-012-6639-0 · Cited by 32
Lipiński, P. F. J., & Szurmak, P. (2017) · Chemical Papers · doi:10.1007/s11696-017-0215-7 · Cited by 32
“Model 3 fulfils also the widely accepted criteria for QSAR model predictive power (Golbraikh and Tropsha 2002) SI-4 in Electronic Supporting Material).”
BackgroundDesign, synthesis, antifungal activity, and 3D-QSAR of coumarin derivatives
Yan, W., Peng, W., Wang, D., Hao, S., Li, W., & Ding, F. (2018) · Journal of Pesticide Science · doi:10.1584/jpestics.d17-075 · Cited by 32
Floresta, G., Amata, E., Dichiara, M., Marrazzo, A., Salerno, L., Romeo, G., Prezzavento, O., Pittalà, V., & Rescifina, A. (2018) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.201800176 · Cited by 32
Evaluation of conjugate depths of hydraulic jump in circular pipes using evolutionary computing
Najafzadeh, M. (2019) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-019-03877-9 · Cited by 32
“And one more, this criterion for the selection of the most efficient models with the highest level of accuracy was successfully used in different fields of engineering (e.g., Golbraikh and Tropsha 2002; Roy and Roy 2008; Gandomi et al. 2011; Sattar 2014; Najafzadeh et al. 2016).”
Aissouq, A. E., Toufik, H., Stitou, M., Ouammou, A., & Lamchouri, F. (2019) · International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics · doi:10.1007/s10989-019-09939-8 · Cited by 32
Yadav, D. K., Kaushik, P., Pankaj, Rana, V. S., Kamil, D., Khatri, D., & Shakil, N. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2019.00814 · Cited by 32
Tariq, R., Hussain, Y., Sheikh, N. A., Afaq, K. S., & Ali, H. M. (2020) · International Journal of Thermophysics · doi:10.1007/s10765-020-2619-9 · Cited by 32
Wang, Y., & Chen, X. (2020) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d0ra02701d · Cited by 32
Khamoulı, S., Belaıdı, S., Ouassaf, M., Lanez, T., Belaaouad, S., & Chtita, S. (2020) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2020.1824815 · Cited by 32
“To establish the robustness and validate the predictive ability of QSAR models, external validation tests, such as Golbraikh and Tropsha (2002) statistical characteristics following criteria: 1) Q2cv> 0.5 2) R2pred > 0:6 3) R2 R20ð Þ R2 0:1 or R2 R020ð Þ R2 0:1 4) 0.85 K 1.15 or 0.85 K’ 1.15 5Þ…”
MethodInfluentialKhaldan, A., Bouamrane, S., En-Nahli, F., El-Mernissi, R., Khatabi, K. E., Hmamouchi, R., Maghat, H., Ajana, M. A., Sbai, A., Bouachrıne, M., et al. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06603 · Cited by 36
“In this paper, the biological activities of four carboxamides sulfonamide scaffolds were predicted using the suggested 3D-QSAR model in order to evaluate the external predictive capacity of the molded model [33].”
Karimipour, A., Jahangir, H., & Eidgahee, D. R. (2021) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103398 · Cited by 32
Ground motion model for Peninsular India using an artificial neural network
Meenakshi, Y., Vemula, S., Alne, A., & Raghukanth, S. T. G. (2023) · Earthquake Spectra · doi:10.1177/87552930221144330 · Cited by 32
“The Rrup or Rjb are unavailable for the PI region and Gupta et al. (2017) database records.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialfadili, M. E., Er-rajy, M., Eltayb, W. A., Kara, M., Assouguem, A., Saleh, A., Kamaly, O. M. A., Zarougui, S., & Elhallaoui, M. (2023) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.105105 · Cited by 32
Zhang, Y., Xia, Z., Li, Y., & Liu, S. (2015) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules20058270 · Cited by 32
“It is based on the following four criteria [43,45]: (i) q2Yrand < 0.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLiang, G., Xu, J., & Liu, L. (2013) · Fluid Phase Equilibria · doi:10.1016/j.fluid.2013.06.008 · Cited by 32
Caruso, A., Alvarez‐Sánchez, R., Hillebrecht, A., Poirier, A., Schuler, F., Lavé, T., Funk, C., & Belli, S. (2013) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2013.02.021 · Cited by 33
“It has to be noted that LOOCV might overestimate model predictive performances when applied to redundant datasets [35].”
BackgroundBond-based linear indices in QSAR: computational discovery of novel anti-trichomonal compounds
Marrero‐Ponce, Y., Meneses‐Marcel, A., Rivera-Borroto, O. M., García‐Domenech, R., de Julián‐Ortiz, J. V., Montero, A., Escario, J. A., Gómez‐Barrio, A., Pereira, D. M., Nogal‐Ruiz, J. J., et al. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-008-9171-1 · Cited by 32
Docking and CoMSIA studies on steroids and non-steroidal chemicals as androgen receptor ligands
Wang, X., Li, X., Shi, W. F., Wei, S., Giesy, J. P., Yu, H., & Wang, Y. (2012) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.11.020 · Cited by 32
“4) (Wang et al., 2005; Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002), thus further analysis based on these models would be appropriate.”
Backgroundde Melo, E. B. (2011) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.08.026 · Cited by 32
On the Use of 1H and 13C 1D NMR Spectra as QSPR Descriptors
Willighagen, E., Denissen, H. M. G. W., Wehrens, R., & Buydens, L. M. C. (2006) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci050282s · Cited by 32
Castilho, M. S., Guido, R. V. C., & Andricopulo, A. D. (2007) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2007.06.021 · Cited by 32
Goodarzi, M., & Freitas, M. P. (2008) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp8059085 · Cited by 32
Taha, M. O., Al-Sha’er, M. A., Khanfar, M. A., & Al-Nadaf, A. H. (2014) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.07.056 · Cited by 32
Quantitative structure–property relationships for the reactivity parameters of acrylate monomers
Yu, X., Yi, B., & Wang, X. (2008) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.09.028 · Cited by 32
Application of QSAR and Shape Pharmacophore Modeling Approaches for Targeted Chemical Library Design
Ebalunode, J. O., Zheng, W., & Tropsha, A. (2010) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-931-4_6 · Cited by 33
Self-citationDevelopmental Toxicity Prediction
Venkatapathy, R., & Wang, N. C. Y. (2012) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-059-5_14 · Cited by 32
Melagraki, G., Afantitis, A., Sarimveis, H., Koutentis, P. A., Markopoulos, J., & Igglessi‐Markopoulou, O. (2007) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2007.08.036 · Cited by 32
Asikainen, A. H., Ruuskanen, J., & Tuppurainen, K. A. (2003) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci034110b · Cited by 32
Shaikh, A. R., Ismael, M., Carpio, C. A. D., Tsuboi, H., Koyama, M., Endou, A., Kubo, M., Brocławik, E., & Miyamoto, A. (2006) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.06.039 · Cited by 32
Valkova, I., Vračko, M., & Basak, S. C. (2004) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2003.12.035 · Cited by 32
Hosseini, R., Newlands, N., Dean, C., & Takemura, A. (2015) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs70302752 · Cited by 31
“Thus, the CVR value should always be accompanied by descriptive statistics of the training data set used to compute it, such as CVE (also denoted RMSE) [30,32].”
MethodInfluentialBoczar, D., & Michalska, K. (2024) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules29133159 · Cited by 39
Stacked-based hybrid gradient boosting models for estimating seepage from lined canals
Elshaarawy, M. K. (2025) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106913 · Cited by 31
Chaudhari, P. J., & Bari, S. B. (2015) · Molecular Diversity · doi:10.1007/s11030-015-9635-x · Cited by 31
Moorthy, N. S. H. N., Ramos, M. J., & Fernandes, P. A. (2011) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.02.010 · Cited by 32
Global Performance and Trend of QSAR/QSPR Research: A Bibliometric Analysis
Li, L., Hu, J., & Ho, Y. (2014) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201300180 · Cited by 32
“Golbraikh and Tropsha (2002)[33] 1088 QSAR modeling; LOO cross-validation; training and test sets; kNN QSAR USA/USA Molecular similarity indexes in a comparativeanalysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological-activity Klebe et al. (1994)[85] 954 N/A Germany/Germany…”
MethodBhadoriya, K. S., Kumavat, N. K., Bhavthankar, S. V., Avchar, M. H., Dhumal, D. M., Patil, S. D., & Jain, S. V. (2012) · Journal of Saudi Chemical Society · doi:10.1016/j.jscs.2012.11.001 · Cited by 31
“However, a QSAR model is considered to be predictive, if the following conditions are satisfied: q 2 > 0.6 and pred_ r 2 > 0.5 (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002).”
InfluentialFranco, P., Porta, N., Holliday, J. D., & Willett, P. (2014) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/1758-2946-6-5 · Cited by 31
“It is generally considered better, however, to use a distinct test-set that has not been involved in the training [30,31], and this was accomplished here using data kindly provided by the CHMP that typifies their regular work-load.”
MethodArthur, D. E., Uzairu, A., Mamza, P. A., & Abechi, S. E. (2016) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2016.03.010 · Cited by 31
Kar, S., Sizochenko, N., Ahmed, L., Batista, V. S., & Leszczyński, J. (2016) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.011 · Cited by 31
Kaur, M., Singh, M., & Silakari, O. (2017) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc-2017-0037 · Cited by 31
QSAR modelling: a therapeutic patent review 2010-present
Halder, A. K., Moura, A. S., & Cordeiro, M. N. D. S. (2018) · Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents · doi:10.1080/13543776.2018.1475560 · Cited by 31
“available to general public (vide patent’s page 28, Table 14) and the formula of r2 Pred was applied [45,90].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Golbraikh, A., & Tropsha, A.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tropsha, Alexander
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 269-276
- ISSN
- 1093-3263 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087661061
- Cited by
- 3,735
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 133 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 179 · 2023: 174 · 2022: 194 · 2021: 197 · 2020: 215 · 2019: 189 · 2018: 200 · 2017: 174 · 2016: 181 · 2015: 175 · 2014: 197 · 2013: 203 · 2012: 202
- FWCI
- 52.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- leave-one-out cross-validation, QSAR model validation, predictive power, external validation, 2D molecular descriptors, overfitting, model evaluation metrics
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Ligands, Mathematical Computing, Models, Molecular, Receptors, Histamine H1, Steroids, Transcortin, Databases, Factual, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Ecdysteroids
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review