The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beware of q2!
Abstract
Validation is a crucial aspect of any quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling. This paper examines one of the most popular validation criteria, leave-one-out cross-validated R2 (LOO q2). Often, a high value of this statistical characteristic (q2 > 0.5) is considered as a proof of the high predictive ability of the model. In this paper, we show that this assumption is generally incorrect. In the case of 3D QSAR, the lack of the correlation between the high LOO q2 and the high predictive ability of a QSAR model has been established earlier [Pharm. Acta Helv. 70 (1995) 149; J. Chemomet. 10(1996)95; J. Med. Chem. 41 (1998) 2553]. In this paper, we use two-dimensional (2D) molecular descriptors and k nearest neighbors (kNN) QSAR method for the analysis of several datasets. No correlation between the values of q2 for the training set and predictive ability for the test set was found for any of the datasets. Thus, the high value of LOO q2 appears to be the necessary but not the sufficient condition for the model to have a high predictive power. We argue that this is the general property of QSAR models developed using LOO cross-validation. We emphasize that the external validation is the only way to establish a reliable QSAR model. We formulate a set of criteria for evaluation of predictive ability of QSAR models.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Importantly, QSAR modeling was one of the first research fields that highlighted the importance of data curation,13 rigorous validation of developed models,14 and data reproducibility,15 that has recently become a significant concern to the scientific community.16”
From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Similarly, rigorous model validation prior to prediction14 and the importance of rigor in modeling protocols291 have been articulated in several seminal publications in QSAR field292 and have already been adopted as regulatory requirements.84”
From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
Harary, F. (1969) · Cited by 10,739
Structural Determination of Paraffin Boiling Points
Wiener, H. (1947) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01193a005 · Cited by 4,184
Cramer, R. D., Patterson, D. E., & Bunce, J. D. (1988) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00226a005 · Cited by 3,931
Characterization of molecular branching
Randić, M. (1975) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00856a001 · Cited by 3,664
Substituent constants for correlation analysis in chemistry and biology
Hansch, C. H., & Leo, A. J. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,910
Molecular Connectivity in Chemistry and Drug Research
(1976) · Medicinal chemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-406560-4.x5001-6 · Cited by 1,628
Sachs, L. (1984) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5246-7 · Cited by 1,016
Graph theory and molecular orbitals. XII. Acyclic polyenes
Gutman, İ., ić, B. R., Trinajstić, N., & WILCOX, C. F. J. (1975) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.430994 · Cited by 829
Molecular Structure Description: The Electrotopological State
Kier, L. B., & Hall, L. H. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 467
Zheng, W., & Tropsha, A. (1999) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci980033m · Cited by 450
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- S. Clementi, S. Wold, How to choose the proper statistical method, in: H. van de Waterbeemd (Ed.), Chemometrics Methods in Molecular Design, VCH, Weinheim, 1995, pp. 319–338.
- S. Wold, PLS for multivariate linear modeling, in: H. van de Waterbeemd (Ed.), Chemometrics Methods in Molecular Design, VCH, Weinheim, 1995, pp. 195–218.
- L.B. Kier, L.H. Hall, Molecular Connectivity in Structure–Activity Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1986.
- D. Bonchev, Overall connectivity and molecular complexity, in: J. Devillers, A.T. Balaban (Eds.), Topological Indices and Related Descriptors, Gordon and Breach, Reading, UK, 1999, pp. 361–401.
- R.D. Clark, D.G. Sprous, J.M. Leonard, Validating models based on large dataset, in: H.-D. Höltje, W. Sippl (Eds.), Rational Approaches to Drug Design. Proceedings of the 13th European Symposium on Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships, Prous Sci., 2001, 475–485.
- A. Golbraikh, D. Bonchev, Y.-D. Xiao, A. Tropsha, Novel chiral topological descriptors and their applications to QSAR, in: H.-D. Höltje, W. Sippl (Eds.), Rational Approaches to Drug Design. Proceedings of the 13th European Symposium on Quantitative Structure–Activity relationships, Aug. 27–Sept. 1, 2000, Duesseldorf, Germany, Prous Science, 2001, 219–223.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,004
Liu, Q., Zhu, R., Gao, S., Ma, S., Tang, H., Yang, J., Ya-mei, D., Wang, H., & Zhu, H. (2016) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4363 · Cited by 55
Prediction of dielectric constant of ionic liquids
Rybińska‐Fryca, A., Sosnowska, A., & Puzyn, T. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2018.03.080 · Cited by 55
Chu, Y., Li, M., Liu, J.-W., Xu, W., Cheng, S.-H., & Zhao, H. Z. (2018) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.006 · Cited by 55
Brahmachari, G., Choo, C., Ambure, P. S., & Roy, K. (2015) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2015.06.005 · Cited by 55
Saı́z-Urra, L., González, M. P., & Teijeira, M. (2007) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2007.02.032 · Cited by 55
Marrero‐Ponce, Y., Marrero, R. M., Torrens, F., Martinez, Y., Bernal, M. G., Zaldívar, V. R., Castro, E. A., & Ábalo, R. G. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-005-0024-8 · Cited by 55
Robust scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions with quantum chemical charge models.
Wang, J.-C., Lin, J.-H., Chen, C.-M., Perryman, A. L., & Olson, A. J. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci200220v · Cited by 54
Tabti, K., Elmchichi, L., Sbai, A., Maghat, H., Bouachrıne, M., Lakhlifi, T., & Ghosh, A. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.132291 · Cited by 54
Daouı, O., Nour, H., Abchır, O., Elkhattabi, S., Bakhouch, M., & Chtita, S. (2022) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2022.2124456 · Cited by 56
“Table S2 in supplementary materials presents a summary of the most important statistical parameters that we evaluated in this work with their recommended thresholds (Golbraikh & Tropsha, 2002a, 2002b; R€ucker et al., 2007; Tropsha, 2010).”
BackgroundTowards Better BBB Passage Prediction Using an Extensive and Curated Data Set
Brito‐Sánchez, Y., Marrero‐Ponce, Y., Barigye, S. J., Goenaga, I. A. Y., Morell, C., Le‐Thi‐Thu, H., & Cherkasov, A. R. (2015) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201400118 · Cited by 55
Fernández, M., Tundidor‐Camba, A., & Caballero, J. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci050263i · Cited by 54
Irannejad, H., Kebriaieezadeh, A., Zarghi, A., Montazer-Sadegh, F., Shafiee, A., Assadieskandar, A., & Amini, M. (2013) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2013.12.002 · Cited by 54
Selection of data sets for qsars: Analyses of tetrahymena toxicity from aromatic compounds
Schultz, T. W., Netzeva, T. I., & Cronin, M. (2003) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/1062936021000058782 · Cited by 54
Computational approaches to predict drug metabolism
Czodrowski, P., Kriegl, J. M., Scheuerer, S., & Fox, T. (2009) · Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology · doi:10.1517/17425250802568009 · Cited by 54
“Therefore, subsequent testing and validation on independent data sets, possibly accompanied by statements about prediction accuracy, prediction reliability and applicability domain, has to be an integral part of the modeling process [30-34] .”
BackgroundTrossini, G. H. G., Guido, R. V. C., Oliva, G., Ferreira, E. I., & Andricopulo, A. D. (2009) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2009.03.001 · Cited by 55
Improved wheat yield and production forecasting with a moisture stress index, AVHRR and MODIS data
SCHUT, A. G. T., Stephens, D. J., Stovold, R., Adams, M. J., & Craig, R. L. (2009) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/cp08182 · Cited by 54
Chaudhaery, S. S., Roy, K. K., & Saxena, A. K. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci900049e · Cited by 54
Exploring conformational search protocols for ligand-based virtual screening and 3-D QSAR modeling
Cappel, D., Dixon, S. L., Sherman, W., & Duan, J. (2014) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-014-9813-4 · Cited by 55
“Golbraikh and Tropsha have shown that ‘‘external validation is the only way to establish a reliable QSAR model’’ [70].”
BackgroundVentura, C. M., & Martins, F. E. L. (2008) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm701048s · Cited by 54
Moussa, N., Hassan, A., & Gharaghani, S. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06605 · Cited by 53
“Other statistical parameters were performed to insure good quality of the model [29, 30].”
MethodChen, H., Yamaguchi, S., Morita, Y., Nakao, H., Zhai, X., Shimizu, Y., Mitsunuma, H., & Kanai, M. (2021) · Cell Reports Physical Science · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100679 · Cited by 54
“5 is known to be sometimes optimistic.(60) Thus, we employed the 4-fold cross-validation and external validation (Note S11; Figure S12) as well.”
MethodYamari, I., Abchır, O., Mali, S. N., Errougui, A., Talbi, M., Kouali, M. E., & Chtita, S. (2023) · Scientific African · doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01754 · Cited by 53
“Higher values for R 2 ex , Q 2 F 1 , Q 2 F 2 , Q 2 F 3 , Golbraikh, and Tropsha criteria [34] and CCC ex depicted the external predictive power of the developed models 1-2 .”
Gramatica, P., Pilutti, P., & Papa, E. (2004) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.07.026 · Cited by 53
Achary, P. G. R. (2014) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/1062936x.2014.899267 · Cited by 53
Tebby, C., Mombelli, E., Pandard, P., & Péry, A. R. R. (2011) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.029 · Cited by 53
Hajjo, R., Setola, V., Roth, B. L., & Tropsha, A. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm2011657 · Cited by 55
“This approach is always employed as part of our predictive QSAR modeling workflow 61;71 to emphasize the fact that training-set-only modeling is not sufficient to obtain reliable models that are externally predictive 72 .”
MethodSelf-citationZiaee, S. A., Sadrossadat, E., Alavi, A. H., & Danial Mohammadzadeh, S. (2014) · Environmental Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3630-x · Cited by 53
“Besides, new criteria recommended by Golbraikh and Tropsha (2002) are checked for external validation of the model on the testing data sets.”
MethodMedina‐Franco, J. L., Golbraikh, A., Oloff, S., Castillo, R., & Tropsha, A. (2005) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-005-4789-8 · Cited by 53
Self-citationSharma, M. C., Sharma, S., Sahu, N. K., & Kohli, D. V. (2011) · Journal of Saudi Chemical Society · doi:10.1016/j.jscs.2011.03.005 · Cited by 54
“The sphere exclusion (SE) method (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002) molecules, respectively, with dissimilarity value of 7.4 where the dissimilarity value gives the sphere exclusion radius.”
InfluentialAchary, P. G. R. (2014) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/1062936x.2013.842930 · Cited by 53
“…by the randomization technique (Y-scram-bling) [25] and by external validation characteristics in terms of k , which should be 0.85 < k < 1.15 [26], kk should be 0.85 < kk < 1.15 [26], r m2 and r * should both be greater than 0.5 N act is the number of SMILES attributes which are not blocked.…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA perspective on quantitative structure–activity relationships and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors
Clare, B. W., & Supuran, C. T. (2006) · Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology · doi:10.1517/17425255.2.1.113 · Cited by 53
Three-dimensional QSAR analysis and design of new 1,2,4-oxadiazole antibacterials
Leemans, E., Mahasenan, K. V., Kumarasiri, M., Spink, E., Ding, D., O’Daniel, P. I., Boudreau, M. A., Lastochkin, E., Testero, S. A., Yamaguchi, T., et al. (2015) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.12.041 · Cited by 53
“82 was obtained using five components (see Table 1), thus demonstrating a satisfactory level of internal predicting power.(29) However, Golbraikh and Tropsha state that q(2) alone is not sufficient for reliable predictive power.”
Gissi, A., Gadaleta, D., Floris, M., Olla, S., Carotti, A., Novellino, E., Benfenati, E., & Nicolotti, O. (2014) · ALTEX · doi:10.14573/altex.1305221 · Cited by 53
Alves, V. M., Golbraikh, A., Capuzzi, S. J., Liu, K., Lam, W. I., Korn, D., Pozefsky, D., Andrade, C. H., Muratov, E. N., & Tropsha, A. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00124 · Cited by 56
“Several important procedures have been developed to increase the reliability and predictive power of models, such as chemical and biological data curation, 7–9 best practices for model development and validation, 10,11 and calculation of the modelability index (MODI) 12 .”
Self-citationBorhani, T. N. G., García‐Muñoz, S., Luciani, C. V., Galindo, A., & Adjiman, C. S. (2019) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c8cp07562j · Cited by 53
Khajeh, A., Shakourian‐Fard, M., & Parvaneh, K. (2020) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114744 · Cited by 53
Asati, V., Bharti, S. K., & Budhwani, A. K. (2016) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.12.006 · Cited by 52
Evolutionary modelling of the COVID-19 pandemic in fifteen most affected countries
Salgotra, R., Gandomi, M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2020) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110118 · Cited by 52
Liu, Q., Lin, J., Li, W., Wang, S., Zhou, P., Mei, L., & Shang, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.800857 · Cited by 52
Kumar, S., Kumar, D. R., Wipulanusat, W., & Keawsawasvong, S. (2024) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109844 · Cited by 52
Revisiting Protocols for the NMR Analysis of Bacterial Metabolomes
Powers, R., Halouska, S., Zhang, B., Gaupp, R., Lei, S., Snell, E., Fenton, R. J., Barletta, R. G., & Somerville, G. A. (2013) · Journal of Integrated OMICS · doi:10.5584/jiomics.v3i2.139 · Cited by 52
Souza, É. S., Zaramello, L., Kuhnen, C. A., Junkes, B. D. S., Yunes, R. A., & Heinzen, V. E. F. (2011) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms12107250 · Cited by 52
“The authors’ state that the correlation coefficient, r, between the predicted and observed activities of compounds from an external test set should be close to 1 [40,41].”
BackgroundMethodToropov, A. A., Toropova, A. P., Benfenati, E., Leszczyńska, D., & Leszczyński, J. (2009) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21333 · Cited by 52
Li, X., Ye, L., Wang, X., Xinzhou, W., Liu, H., Zhu, Y., & Yu, H. (2012) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2012.08.030 · Cited by 52
“The overall predictive ability of the CoMSIA model was externally validated by predicting the activity of independent test set compounds (the compounds not included in the original training set) (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002; Liao et al., 2009).”
MethodTalebi, M., Schuster, G., Shellie, R. A., Szücs, R., & Haddad, P. R. (2015) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2015.10.099 · Cited by 52
Ruiz, P., Begluitti, G., Tincher, T., Wheeler, J., & Mumtaz, M. M. (2012) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules17088982 · Cited by 55
“[26–35].”
BackgroundJing, P., Zhao, S.-J., Ruan, S., Sui, Z., Chen, L., Jiang, L., & Qian, B. (2013) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.08.082 · Cited by 52
“The commonly accepted values for a satisfactory QSAR model and q2 > 0.5 and r2 > 0.8 (Golbraikh & Tropsha, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialToropov, A. A., Raška, I., Toropova, A. P., Rašková, M., Veselinović, A. M., & Veselinović, J. B. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.439 · Cited by 52
Predicting the Toxicity of Ionic Liquids toward Acetylcholinesterase Enzymes Using Novel QSAR Models
Zhu, P., Kang, X., Zhao, Y., Ullah, L., & Zhang, H. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20092186 · Cited by 52
Li, P., Khan, M. A., Galal, A. M., Awan, H. H., Zafar, A., Javed, M. F., Khan, M. I., Qayyum, S., Malik, M. Y., & Wang, F. (2022) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2022.139478 · Cited by 52
Samadi, M., Sarkardeh, H., & Jabbari, E. (2020) · Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/s00477-020-01794-0 · Cited by 51
Xu, T., Chen, J., Chen, X., Xie, H., Wang, Z., Xia, D., Tang, W., & Xie, H. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c06891 · Cited by 50
Baidya, S. K., Banerjee, S., Ghosh, B., Jha, T., & Adhikari, N. (2023) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/1062936x.2023.2261842 · Cited by 51
“Additionally, the calculation of r m2 [44], and Golbraikh and Tropsha [45] matrices as well as the Y-scrambling test [29,31] were also done to estimate the robustness and reliability of the final model predictions [29,31].”
MethodSynthesis, inhibitory activities, and QSAR study of xanthone derivatives as α-glucosidase inhibitors
Liu, Y., Ke, Z., Cui, J., Chen, W., Ma, L., & Wang, B. (2008) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2008.06.043 · Cited by 51
Hernández, N., Kiralj, R., Ferreira, M. M. C., & Talavera, I. (2009) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.04.012 · Cited by 51
A novel QSAR model for predicting the inhibition of CXCR3 receptor by 4-N-aryl-[1,4] diazepane ureas
Afantitis, A., Melagraki, G., Sarimveis, H., Igglessi‐Markopoulou, O., & Kollias, G. A. (2008) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.05.028 · Cited by 51
Ranking of aquatic toxicity of esters modelled by QSAR
Papa, E., Battaini, F., & Gramatica, P. (2004) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.08.003 · Cited by 51
Predicting reaction rate constants of ozone with organic compounds from radical structures
Yu, X., Yi, B., Wang, X., & Chen, J. (2012) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.037 · Cited by 51
Pharmacophore filtering and 3D-QSAR in the discovery of new JAK2 inhibitors
Singh, K. D., Muthusamy, K., Kirubakaran, P., & Nagamani, S. (2011) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2011.07.004 · Cited by 51
Roy, K., & Paul, S. (2009) · QSAR & Combinatorial Science · doi:10.1002/qsar.200810130 · Cited by 51
QSPR studies of impact sensitivity of nitro energetic compounds using three-dimensional descriptors
Xu, J., Zhu, L., Fang, D., Wang, L., Xiao, S., Li, L., & Xu, W. (2012) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2012.03.002 · Cited by 51
Ngo, T.-D., Tran, T., Le, M.-T., & Thai, K. (2016) · Molecular Diversity · doi:10.1007/s11030-016-9688-5 · Cited by 51
Gandomi, A. H., Alavi, A. H., Gandomi, M., & Kazemi, S. (2016) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2016.10.024 · Cited by 51
Barley, M. H., Turner, N. J., & Goodacre, R. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00488 · Cited by 51
Abdizadeh, R., Hadizadeh, F., & Abdizadeh, T. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.126961 · Cited by 50
Lin, T., Li, H.-T., & Tsai, K. (2003) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci030295a · Cited by 51
Yap, C. W., & Chen, Y. (2004) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.20232 · Cited by 51
fadili, M. E., Er-rajy, M., Imtara, H., Noman, O. M., Mothana, R. A., Abdullah, S., Zerougui, S., & Elhallaoui, M. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13706 · Cited by 52
“For this reason, the Y-Randomization test is necessary [6,51].”
MethodVasilev, B., & Atanasova, M. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15031206 · Cited by 57
Murrell, D. S., Cortés‐Ciriano, I., van Westen, G. J. P., Stott, I. P., Bender, A., Malliavin, T. E., & Glen, R. C. (2015) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-015-0086-2 · Cited by 50
“The value of these metrics permits the assessment of model performance according to the criteria proposed by Tropsha and Golbraikh [37, 38], namely: q(2) CV > 0.”
MethodJudge, V., Narasimhan, B., Ahuja, M., Sriram, D., Yogeeswari, P., Clercq, E. D., Pannecouque, C. C., & Balzarini, J. M. (2011) · Medicinal Chemistry Research · doi:10.1007/s00044-011-9705-2 · Cited by 50
“5 is the basic requirement for qualifying a QSAR model as the valid one (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002).”
InfluentialAn empirical model for shear capacity of RC deep beams using genetic-simulated annealing
Gandomi, A. H., Alavi, A. H., Danial Mohammadzadeh, S., & Sahab, M. G. (2013) · Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.acme.2013.02.007 · Cited by 50
Novel approach to predicting hormetic effects of antibiotic mixtures on Vibrio fischeri
Zou, X., Lin, Z., Deng, Z., & Yin, D. (2012) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.042 · Cited by 50
“The Q 2ðExtÞ of the external validation sets were also larger than 0.90, and the difference between Q2ðExtÞ and R 2 did not exceed 0.3, suggesting that the developed models have good predictive abilities and no danger of over-fitting or over-estimating the re- sults (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002).”
InfluentialMarrero‐Ponce, Y., Meneses‐Marcel, A., Castillo‐Garit, J. A., Tugores, Y. M., Escario, J. A., Gómez‐Barrio, A., Pereira, D. M., Nogal‐Ruiz, J. J., Arán, V. J., Martínez‐Fernández, A. R., et al. (2006) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2006.06.016 · Cited by 50
Building energy consumption forecast using multi-objective genetic programming
Tahmassebi, A., & Gandomi, A. H. (2018) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2018.01.032 · Cited by 50
Lai, Y., Yan, Y., Liao, S.-H., Li, Y., Ye, Y., Liu, N., Zhao, F., & Xu, P. (2020) · Archives of Pharmacal Research · doi:10.1007/s12272-020-01230-5 · Cited by 52
“It is generally accepted that Total Score is > 6 for better activity, and ≥ 9 for very good activity (Golbraikh and Tropsha 2002) .”
InfluentialShah, M. I., Memon, S. A., Niazi, M. S. K., Amin, M. N., Aslam, F., & Javed, M. F. (2021) · Advances in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1155/2021/6682283 · Cited by 50
“, k and k′, passing through the origin should be nearly equal to 1 [86].”
BackgroundLarvicidal activities of some organotin compounds on mosquito larvae: A QSAR study
Hansch, C. H., & Verma, R. P. (2008) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.02.040 · Cited by 49
Design, synthesis, antibacterial, and QSAR studies of myristic acid derivatives
Narasimhan, B., Mourya, V. K., & Dhake, A. S. (2006) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.02.056 · Cited by 50
Fjodorova, N., Vračko, M., Tušar, M., Jezierska, A., Novič, M., Kühne, R., & Schüürmann, G. (2009) · Molecular Diversity · doi:10.1007/s11030-009-9190-4 · Cited by 50
“[88] should be considered to confirm that proposed QSAR models have both, robustness and predictive power.”
BackgroundNour, H., Abchır, O., Belaıdı, S., Qais, F. A., Chtita, S., & Belaaouad, S. (2021) · Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society · doi:10.1002/bkcs.12449 · Cited by 49
Li, F., Wang, P., Fan, T., Zhang, N., Zhao, L., Zhong, R., & Sun, G. (2024) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133410 · Cited by 49
Sharma, P., Ranjan, P., & Chakraborty, T. (2024) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2024.2331620 · Cited by 54
Javed, M. F., Khan, M., Fawad, M., Alabduljabbar, H., Najeh, T., & Gamil, Y. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-65255-2 · Cited by 53
Hajjo, R., Grulke, C., Golbraikh, A., Setola, V., Huang, X., Roth, B. L., & Tropsha, A. (2010) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm100600y · Cited by 49
Self-citation4-Thiazolidinone derivatives: synthesis, antimicrobial, anticancer evaluation and QSAR studies
Deep, A., Narasimhan, B., Lim, S. M., Ramasamy, K., Mishra, R. K., & Mani, V. (2016) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c6ra23006g · Cited by 49
“2-4) are valid ones (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002).”
Error measures in quantitative structure-retention relationships studies
Taraji, M., Haddad, P. R., Amos, R. I. J., Talebi, M., Szücs, R., Dolan, J. W., & Pohl, C. A. (2017) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2017.09.050 · Cited by 49
Montero, A., Vega, C., Marrero‐Ponce, Y., Rolón, M. S., Gómez‐Barrio, A., Escario, J. A., Arán, V. J., Martínez‐Fernández, A. R., & Meneses‐Marcel, A. (2005) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2005.06.049 · Cited by 49
Marrero‐Ponce, Y., Nodarse, D., González‐Díaz, H., de Armas, R. R., Zaldívar, V. R., Torrens, F., & Castro, E. A. (2004) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/i5110276 · Cited by 49
Development of a Sigma-2 Receptor affinity filter through a Monte Carlo based QSAR analysis
Rescifina, A., Floresta, G., Marrazzo, A., Parenti, C., Prezzavento, O., Nastasi, G., Dichiara, M., & Amata, E. (2017) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2017.05.061 · Cited by 48
Liu, A., Wang, X., Wang, L., Wang, H., & Wang, H. (2006) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.12.029 · Cited by 48
Baba, H., Takahara, J.-I., & Mamitsuka, H. (2015) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-015-1629-y · Cited by 49
“Golbraikh and Tropsha (47) and Roy (48) suggested the following criteria to validate QSPR models: A model is highly predictive if its statistical characteristics satisfy the following conditions in external validation:”
BackgroundMethodTowards interoperable and reproducible QSAR analyses: Exchange of datasets
Spjuth, O., Willighagen, E., Guha, R., Eklund, M., & Wikberg, J. E. S. (2010) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/1758-2946-2-5 · Cited by 48
“There exist many examples of investigations regarding the resulting statistical models with respect to validity and applicability in QSAR and similar fields [9,10].”
BackgroundTian, F., Lv, Y., & Li, Y. (2011) · Amino Acids · doi:10.1007/s00726-011-1101-1 · Cited by 50
“However, Golbraikh and Tropsha (2002) pointed out that a more reliable result should be obtained by dividing external test set.”
BackgroundPrediction of refractive index of vinyl polymers by using density functional theory
Yu, X., Yi, B., & Wang, X. (2007) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20752 · Cited by 48
van Westen, G. J. P., Hendriks, A., Wegner, J. K., IJzerman, A. P., van Vlijmen, H., & Bender, A. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002899 · Cited by 48
“[ 36,62] Density based applicability domain As our models are trained on a database of different HIV mutants, applicability domains based on a single wild type sequence are expected to perform sub optimal.”
MethodRoy, K., & Mandal, A. S. (2008) · Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1080/14756360701811379 · Cited by 48
“All the models have satisfied the requirement of the value of (r2 2 r20)/r 2 being less than 0.1 as recommended by Golbraikh and Tropsha [52].”
MethodInfluentialQSPR study of Setschenow constants of organic compounds using MLR, ANN, and SVM analyses
Xu, J., Wang, L., Wang, L., Shen, X., & Xu, W. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21907 · Cited by 49
Ojha, P. K., & Roy, K. (2017) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2017.03.043 · Cited by 48
“We have also validated the model using Golbraikh and Tropsha criteria and the results are given in Table 2.”
MethodInfluentialWang, D., Shi, J., Xiong, Y., Hu, J., Lin, Z., Qiu, Y., & Cheng, J. (2017) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.059 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Golbraikh, A., & Tropsha, A.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tropsha, Alexander
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 269-276
- ISSN
- 1093-3263 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087661061
- Cited by
- 3,735
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 133 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 179 · 2023: 174 · 2022: 194 · 2021: 197 · 2020: 215 · 2019: 189 · 2018: 200 · 2017: 174 · 2016: 181 · 2015: 175 · 2014: 197 · 2013: 203 · 2012: 202
- FWCI
- 52.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- leave-one-out cross-validation, QSAR model validation, predictive power, external validation, 2D molecular descriptors, overfitting, model evaluation metrics
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Ligands, Mathematical Computing, Models, Molecular, Receptors, Histamine H1, Steroids, Transcortin, Databases, Factual, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Ecdysteroids
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review