The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beware of q2!
Abstract
Validation is a crucial aspect of any quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling. This paper examines one of the most popular validation criteria, leave-one-out cross-validated R2 (LOO q2). Often, a high value of this statistical characteristic (q2 > 0.5) is considered as a proof of the high predictive ability of the model. In this paper, we show that this assumption is generally incorrect. In the case of 3D QSAR, the lack of the correlation between the high LOO q2 and the high predictive ability of a QSAR model has been established earlier [Pharm. Acta Helv. 70 (1995) 149; J. Chemomet. 10(1996)95; J. Med. Chem. 41 (1998) 2553]. In this paper, we use two-dimensional (2D) molecular descriptors and k nearest neighbors (kNN) QSAR method for the analysis of several datasets. No correlation between the values of q2 for the training set and predictive ability for the test set was found for any of the datasets. Thus, the high value of LOO q2 appears to be the necessary but not the sufficient condition for the model to have a high predictive power. We argue that this is the general property of QSAR models developed using LOO cross-validation. We emphasize that the external validation is the only way to establish a reliable QSAR model. We formulate a set of criteria for evaluation of predictive ability of QSAR models.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Importantly, QSAR modeling was one of the first research fields that highlighted the importance of data curation,13 rigorous validation of developed models,14 and data reproducibility,15 that has recently become a significant concern to the scientific community.16”
From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Similarly, rigorous model validation prior to prediction14 and the importance of rigor in modeling protocols291 have been articulated in several seminal publications in QSAR field292 and have already been adopted as regulatory requirements.84”
From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
Harary, F. (1969) · Cited by 10,739
Structural Determination of Paraffin Boiling Points
Wiener, H. (1947) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01193a005 · Cited by 4,184
Cramer, R. D., Patterson, D. E., & Bunce, J. D. (1988) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00226a005 · Cited by 3,931
Characterization of molecular branching
Randić, M. (1975) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00856a001 · Cited by 3,664
Substituent constants for correlation analysis in chemistry and biology
Hansch, C. H., & Leo, A. J. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,910
Molecular Connectivity in Chemistry and Drug Research
(1976) · Medicinal chemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-406560-4.x5001-6 · Cited by 1,628
Sachs, L. (1984) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5246-7 · Cited by 1,016
Graph theory and molecular orbitals. XII. Acyclic polyenes
Gutman, İ., ić, B. R., Trinajstić, N., & WILCOX, C. F. J. (1975) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.430994 · Cited by 829
Molecular Structure Description: The Electrotopological State
Kier, L. B., & Hall, L. H. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 467
Zheng, W., & Tropsha, A. (1999) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci980033m · Cited by 450
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- S. Clementi, S. Wold, How to choose the proper statistical method, in: H. van de Waterbeemd (Ed.), Chemometrics Methods in Molecular Design, VCH, Weinheim, 1995, pp. 319–338.
- S. Wold, PLS for multivariate linear modeling, in: H. van de Waterbeemd (Ed.), Chemometrics Methods in Molecular Design, VCH, Weinheim, 1995, pp. 195–218.
- L.B. Kier, L.H. Hall, Molecular Connectivity in Structure–Activity Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1986.
- D. Bonchev, Overall connectivity and molecular complexity, in: J. Devillers, A.T. Balaban (Eds.), Topological Indices and Related Descriptors, Gordon and Breach, Reading, UK, 1999, pp. 361–401.
- R.D. Clark, D.G. Sprous, J.M. Leonard, Validating models based on large dataset, in: H.-D. Höltje, W. Sippl (Eds.), Rational Approaches to Drug Design. Proceedings of the 13th European Symposium on Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships, Prous Sci., 2001, 475–485.
- A. Golbraikh, D. Bonchev, Y.-D. Xiao, A. Tropsha, Novel chiral topological descriptors and their applications to QSAR, in: H.-D. Höltje, W. Sippl (Eds.), Rational Approaches to Drug Design. Proceedings of the 13th European Symposium on Quantitative Structure–Activity relationships, Aug. 27–Sept. 1, 2000, Duesseldorf, Germany, Prous Science, 2001, 219–223.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,004
Pibiri, I., Lentini, L., Melfi, R., Tutone, M., Baldassano, S., Galluzzo, P., Leonardo, A. D., & Pace, A. (2018) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.09.057 · Cited by 38
Si, W., Wang, X., Chen, M., Wang, M., Lu, A., & Yang, C. (2019) · New Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c8nj05150j · Cited by 39
A hybrid computational intelligence approach to predict spectral acceleration
Akhani, M., Kashani, A. R., Mousavi, M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2019) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.054 · Cited by 38
Gajewicz, A., Furuhama, A., Yamamoto, H., & Suzuki, N. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130681 · Cited by 38
Hidden in its color: A molecular-level analysis of the beer’s Maillard reaction network
Pieczonka, S. A., Hemmler, D., Moritz, F., Lucio, M., Zarnkow, M., Jacob, F., Rychlik, M., & Schmitt‐Kopplin, P. (2021) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130112 · Cited by 38
Das, R. N., Roy, K., & Popelier, P. L. A. (2015) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.09.014 · Cited by 38
“The classical statistical fitness metrics such as the determination coefficient (R(2)), explained variance (Ra(2)), variance ratio (F-value) (Snedecor and Cochran, 1967), the internal predictivity metrics like leave-one-out cross-validated R(2) (Q(2)(LOO)) (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002), and various external predictivi…”
BackgroundWang, X. S., Tang, H., Golbraikh, A., & Tropsha, A. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci700404c · Cited by 39
Self-citationA Novel RBF Neural Network Training Methodology to Predict Toxicity to Vibrio Fischeri
Melagraki, G., Afantitis, A., Sarimveis, H., Igglessi‐Markopoulou, O., & Alexandridis, A. (2006) · Molecular Diversity · doi:10.1007/s11030-005-9008-y · Cited by 38
Marrero‐Ponce, Y., & Castillo‐Garit, J. A. (2005) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-005-7575-8 · Cited by 38
Afantitis, A., Melagraki, G., Sarimveis, H., Koutentis, P. A., Markopoulos, J., & Igglessi‐Markopoulou, O. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-006-9038-2 · Cited by 38
Golzar, K., Amjad‐Iranagh, S., & Modarress, H. (2014) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie5007432 · Cited by 38
Ecdysteroid Agonists and Antagonists
Dinan, L. N., & Hormann, R. E. (2005) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-44-451924-6/00036-3 · Cited by 38
Pushing the boundaries of 3D-QSAR
CRAMER, R. D. I., & Wendt, B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-006-9100-0 · Cited by 38
Fernández, M., & Caballero, J. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2006.02.005 · Cited by 38
Luo, M., Wang, X. S., Roth, B. L., Golbraikh, A., & Tropsha, A. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400460q · Cited by 37
Self-citationNew QSPR model for prediction of corrosion inhibition using conceptual density functional theory
Camacho-Mendoza, R. L., Feria, L., Zárate-Hernández, L. Á., Alvarado-Rodríguez, J. G., & Cruz‐Borbolla, J. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-022-05240-6 · Cited by 37
Tabti, K., Ahmad, I., Zafar, I., Sbai, A., Maghat, H., Bouachrıne, M., & Lakhlifi, T. (2023) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2023.107855 · Cited by 37
Khan, A., Khan, M., Ali, M., Khan, M., Khan, A. U., Shakeel, M., Fawad, M., Najeh, T., & Gamil, Y. (2023) · Case Studies in Construction Materials · doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02744 · Cited by 37
Li, Y., Fan, T., Ren, T., Zhang, N., Zhao, L., Zhong, R., & Sun, G. (2023) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d3gc03109h · Cited by 37
Estimation of Intact Rock Uniaxial Compressive Strength Using Advanced Machine Learning
Khatti, J., & Grover, K. S. (2023) · Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology · doi:10.1007/s40515-023-00357-4 · Cited by 37
“The hypothesis put forth by Golbraikh and Tropsha (2002) works well as a model in this study.”
Zheng, J., Xiao, G., Guo, J., Zheng, Y., Gao, H., Zhao, S., Zhang, K., & Sun, P. (2011) · Chemical Biology & Drug Design · doi:10.1111/j.1747-0285.2011.01146.x · Cited by 37
“Predictive correlation coefficient q 2 is a useful but not sufficient criterion for model validation, so an external test set (r (2)pred) (19) was recommended for the estimation of predictive ability.”
BackgroundPourbasheer, E., Aalizadeh, R., Ardabili, J. S., & Ganjali, M. R. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2015.01.028 · Cited by 37
Mutatomics analysis of the systematic thermostability profile of Bacillus subtilis lipase A
Tian, F., Yang, C., Wang, C., Guo, T., & Zhou, P. (2014) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-014-2257-x · Cited by 37
Mu, H., Lei, H., Wang, B., Xu, Z., Zhang, C., Li, L., Tian, Y., Hu, J., & Sun, Y. (2014) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf404449n · Cited by 37
Ren, Y., Zhou, L., Li, Y., Liu, P. Y., Zhao, B., & Liu, H. (2016) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/1062936x.2016.1229691 · Cited by 37
Aouidate, A., Ghaleb, A., Ghamali, M., Chtita, S., Choukrad, M., Sbai, A., Bouachrıne, M., & Lakhlifi, T. (2017) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.03.039 · Cited by 37
Mellado, M., Madrid, A., Reyna, M., Oppenheimer, C. W., Mella, J., Salas, C. O., Sánchez, E., & Cuéllar, M. (2018) · Medicinal Chemistry Research · doi:10.1007/s00044-018-2245-2 · Cited by 37
Shukla, A., Tyagi, R., Meena, S., Datta, D. B., Srivastava, S. K., & Khan, F. (2019) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2019.1570868 · Cited by 37
“To scrutinise the predictability of developed model, leave-one-out ( q 2 , LOO), external set predictions ( r 2pred ) and r 2 m matrix were calculated (Cramer III, Bunce, Patterson, & Frank, 1988; Golbraikh & Tropsha, 2002; Ojha et al., 2011).”
MethodVeríssimo, G. C., Dutra, E. F. M., Dias, A. L. T., Fernandes, P. O., Kronenberger, T., Gomes, M. A., & Maltarollo, V. G. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2019.04.007 · Cited by 37
Qi, R., Pan, Y. L., Cao, J., Jia, Z., & Jiang, J. (2020) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126175 · Cited by 37
Virtual Screening of Natural Products Database
Luís, J., Barros, R. P. C., de Sousa, N. F., Muratov, E. N., Scotti, L., & Scotti, L. (2020) · Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/1389557520666200730161549 · Cited by 39
Hermansyah, O., Bustamam, A., & Yanuar, A. (2021) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2021.107597 · Cited by 39
Pradeep, T., GuhaRay, A., Bardhan, A., Samui, P., Kumar, S., & Armaghani, D. J. (2022) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-022-06607-w · Cited by 38
Design, Synthesis, and Molecular Modeling Studies of a Novel Benzimidazole as an Aromatase Inhibitor
Çevik, U. A., Çeli̇k, İ., Mella, J., Mellado, M., Özkay, Y., & Kaplancıklı, Z. A. (2022) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.2c01497 · Cited by 37
McKelvie, J., Wolfe, D., Celejewski, M., Simpson, A., & Simpson, M. (2010) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.022 · Cited by 41
Xu, J., Zhang, H., Wang, L., Liang, G., Wang, L., Shen, X., & Xu, W. (2010) · Spectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.saa.2010.03.027 · Cited by 37
Roy, K., Sanyal, I., & Roy, P. P. (2006) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/10629360601033499 · Cited by 37
Docking and 3D-QSAR Studies on Isatin Sulfonamide Analogues as Caspase-3 Inhibitors
Wang, Q., Mach, R. H., & Reichert, D. E. C. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci900144x · Cited by 37
Soltani, S., Haghaei, H., Shayanfar, A., Vallipour, J., Zeynali, K. A., & Jouyban, A. (2013) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2013/501310 · Cited by 36
“A set of statistical criteria [30, 31] was employed to analyze 36 data points of the test set:”
MethodAmbure, P. S., & Roy, K. (2016) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c6ra04104c · Cited by 37
Cortés‐Ciriano, I., Bender, A., & Malliavin, T. E. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00101 · Cited by 37
The quality of QSAR models: problems and solutions
Kolossov, E., & Stanforth, R. (2007) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/10629360601053984 · Cited by 37
Kumar, D. R., Wipulanusat, W., Kumar, M., Keawsawasvong, S., & Samui, P. (2023) · Intelligent Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.iswa.2023.200314 · Cited by 36
QSAR Study for Carcinogenicity in a Large Set of Organic Compounds
Duchowicz, P. R., Comelli, N. C., Ortiz, E. V., & Castro, E. A. (2012) · Current Drug Safety · doi:10.2174/157488612804096623 · Cited by 36
“model, although this is a necessary but not sufficient condition for its predictive power [55].”
BackgroundGüssregen, S., Matter, H., Heßler, G., Müller, M., Schmidt, F., & Clark, T. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci300253z · Cited by 36
Adhikari, N., Halder, A. K., Mondal, C., & Jha, T. (2013) · Medicinal Chemistry Research · doi:10.1007/s00044-013-0590-8 · Cited by 36
“The R(2)pred calculated on the test set (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002) was recommended for the estimation of predictive ability because q(2) is a useful but not sufficient criterion for model validation.”
InfluentialQSPR analysis for the retention index of flavors and fragrances on a OV-101 column
Rojas, C., Duchowicz, P. R., Tripaldi, P., & Diez, R. P. (2014) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2014.09.020 · Cited by 36
Quantitative structure–activity relationship to predict acute fish toxicity of organic solvents
Levet, A., Bordes, C., Clément, Y., Mignon, P., Chermette, H., Marote, P., Cren‐Olivé, C., & Lantéri, P. (2013) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.002 · Cited by 36
QSAR studies of some side chain modified 7-chloro-4-aminoquinolines as antimalarial agents
Sahu, N. K., Sharma, M. C., Mourya, V., & Kohli, D. V. (2010) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.12.005 · Cited by 36
“However, a QSAR model is considered to be predictive, if the following conditions are satisfied: r2 > 0.6, q2 > 0.6 and pred_r2 > 0.5 (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002).”
MethodInfluentialSlynko, I., Scharfe, M., Rumpf, T., Eib, J., Metzger, E., Schüle, R., Jung, M., & Sippl, W. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400628q · Cited by 36
Mehra, R., Rani, C., Mahajan, P., Vishwakarma, R. A., Khan, I. A., & Nargotra, A. (2016) · ACS Combinatorial Science · doi:10.1021/acscombsci.5b00019 · Cited by 36
Cañizares-Carmenate, Y., Mena‐Ulecia, K., Perera-Sardiña, Y., Torrens, F., & Castillo‐Garit, J. A. (2016) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.10.003 · Cited by 36
Expression Programming Techniques for Formulation of Structural Engineering Systems
Gandomi, A. H., & Alavi, A. H. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-398364-0.00018-8 · Cited by 36
Floresta, G., Apirakkan, O., Rescifina, A., & Abbate, V. (2018) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23092183 · Cited by 36
“62, cross-validated training set) values (Figure S5, Supplementary Materials) [55].”
Seth, A., & Roy, K. (2020) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2020.105627 · Cited by 36
Wang, Y., & Chen, X. (2020) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d0ra08209k · Cited by 36
Ghorbani, B., Arulrajah, A., Narsilio, G. A., Horpibulsuk, S., & Bo, M. W. (2020) · Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106544 · Cited by 36
Xu, G., Zhou, G., Althoey, F., Hadidi, H., Alaskar, A. M., Hassan, A. M., & Farooq, F. (2023) · Journal of Materials Research and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.007 · Cited by 36
Mascarenhas, N. M., & Ghoshal, N. (2007) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2007.10.016 · Cited by 36
Comparison of Different Classification Methods Applied to a Mode of Toxic Action Data Set
Spycher, S., Nendza, M., & Gasteiger, J. (2004) · QSAR & Combinatorial Science · doi:10.1002/qsar.200430877 · Cited by 36
Discovery of Novel HIV Entry Inhibitors for the CXCR4 Receptor by Prospective Virtual Screening
Pérez‐Nueno, V. I., Pettersson, S., Ritchie, D. W., Borrell, J. I., & Teixidó, J. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci800468q · Cited by 38
Estrogenic Activity of Anthraquinone Derivatives:In VitroandIn SilicoStudies
Li, F., Li, X., Shao, J., Chi, P., Chen, J., & Wang, Z. (2010) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx100118g · Cited by 36
Kholod, Y. A., Muratov, E. N., Gorb, L., Hill, F. C., Artemenko, A. G., Kuz’min, V. Е., Qasim, M., & Leszczyński, J. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es902566b · Cited by 36
Toropov, A. A., Toropova, A. P., Benfenati, E., Leszczyńska, D., & Leszczyński, J. (2009) · Journal of Mathematical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s10910-008-9514-0 · Cited by 36
Al‐Sulttani, A. O., Ahsan, A., Hanoon, A. N., Rahman, A., Daud, N. N. N., & Idrus, S. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.011 · Cited by 36
Chapter 8 Machine Learning in Computational Chemistry
Goldman, B. B., & Walters, W. P. (2006) · Annual reports in computational chemistry · doi:10.1016/s1574-1400(06)02008-1 · Cited by 37
Duchowicz, P. R., González, M. P., Helguera, A. M., Cordeiro, M. N. D. S., & Castro, E. A. (2007) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2007.05.001 · Cited by 36
Predictive Bayesian neural network models of MHC class II peptide binding
Burden, F. R., & Winkler, D. A. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2005.03.001 · Cited by 36
Support vector regression and ANN approach for predicting the ground water quality
Alnuwaiser, M. A., Javed, M. F., Khan, M. I., Ahmed, M. W., & Galal, A. M. (2022) · Journal of the Indian Chemical Society · doi:10.1016/j.jics.2022.100538 · Cited by 36
Khan, A. M., Huyan, J., Zhang, R., Zhu, Y., Zhang, W., Gao, Y. L., Ahmad, K. N., & Shah, S. K. (2023) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132833 · Cited by 35
3D-QSAR – Applications, Recent Advances, and Limitations
Sippl, W. (2009) · Challenges and advances in computational chemistry and physics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9783-6_4 · Cited by 36
Wang, D., Yuan, Y., Duan, S., Liu, R., Gu, S., Zhao, S., Liu, L., & Xu, J. (2015) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.02.009 · Cited by 35
Bhadoriya, K. S., Sharma, M. C., Sharma, S., Jain, S. V., & Avchar, M. H. (2013) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.02.002 · Cited by 35
Synthesis, antimicrobial evaluation and QSAR studies of gallic acid derivatives
Khatkar, A., Nanda, A., Kumar, P., & Narasimhan, B. (2013) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.11.014 · Cited by 35
“The value of q 2 more than 0.5 indicated that the model developed is a valid one (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialSu, P., Zhu, H., & Shen, Z. (2015) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-015-5569-1 · Cited by 35
Huang, H., Zong, H., Bian, G., Yue, H., & Song, L. (2014) · The Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jo500982j · Cited by 35
QSAR analysis of the toxicity of phenols and thiophenols using MLR and ANN
Ghamali, M., Chtita, S., Ousaa, A., Elidrissi, B., Bouachrıne, M., & Lakhlifi, T. (2016) · Journal of Taibah University for Science · doi:10.1016/j.jtusci.2016.03.002 · Cited by 35
Predicting chloroform production from organic precursors
Bond, T., & Graham, N. J. D. (2017) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.063 · Cited by 35
“Mean statistical parameters for the fivefold leave-many-out cross-validation show the five individual equations have high predictive power, since r2 > 0.6; q2 > 0.5; 0.85 < k or k0 < 1.15 and r2-r02/r2 < 0.1 (Table S8) (Golbraikh and Tropsha, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialHIVprotI: an integrated web based platform for prediction and design of HIV proteins inhibitors
Qureshi, A., Rajput, A., Kaur, G., & Kumar, M. (2018) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-018-0266-y · Cited by 35
“However, we used Tropsha’s validation test to statistically validate the prediction ability of developed model [31, 32].”
MethodSagandykova, G. N., & Buszewski, B. (2021) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2021.116294 · Cited by 38
QSAR analysis for quinoxaline-2-carboxylate 1,4-di-N-oxides as anti-mycobacterial agents
Vicente, E. F., Duchowicz, P. R., Castro, E. A., & Monge, A. (2009) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2009.03.004 · Cited by 35
Exploring predictive QSAR models for hepatocyte toxicity of phenols using QTMS descriptors
Roy, K., & Popelier, P. L. A. (2008) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.03.035 · Cited by 35
Jasuja, H., Chadha, N., Kaur, M., & Silakari, O. (2014) · Molecular Diversity · doi:10.1007/s11030-013-9497-z · Cited by 35
Melagraki, G., Afantitis, A., Sarimveis, H., Koutentis, P. A., Markopoulos, J., & Igglessi‐Markopoulou, O. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-007-9112-4 · Cited by 35
Ghamali, M., Chtita, S., Hmamouchi, R., Adad, A., Bouachrıne, M., & Lakhlifi, T. (2015) · Journal of Taibah University for Science · doi:10.1016/j.jtusci.2015.09.006 · Cited by 35
fadili, M. E., Er-rajy, M., Mujwar, S., Ajala, A., Bouzammit, R., Kara, M., Abuelizz, H. A., Er-Rahmani, S., & Elhallaoui, M. (2024) · BMC Chemistry · doi:10.1186/s13065-024-01248-6 · Cited by 34
Predictive QSAR modeling of HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor TIBO derivatives
Mandal, A. S., & Roy, K. (2008) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.07.020 · Cited by 34
QSAR modeling of taxane analogues against colon cancer
Verma, R. P., & Hansch, C. H. (2010) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.12.054 · Cited by 34
SMILES‐Based QSAR Models for the Calcium Channel‐Antagonistic Effect of 1,4‐Dihydropyridines
Veselinović, A. M., Milosavljević, J. B., Toropov, A. A., & Nikolić, G. M. (2012) · Archiv der Pharmazie · doi:10.1002/ardp.201200373 · Cited by 34
A data mining approach to compressive strength of CFRP-confined concrete cylinders
Mousavi, S. M., Alavi, A. H., Gandomi, A. H., Esmaeili, M., & Gandomi, M. (2010) · STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS · doi:10.12989/sem.2010.36.6.759 · Cited by 34
“Furthermore, new criteria recommended by Golbraikh and Tropsha (2002) were checked for the external validation of the GP/ ff′ fco′ fco′ SA and MEP models on the testing data sets.”
MethodLi, Y., Weng, X., Ning, F.-X., Ou, J., Hou, J., Luo, H., Li, D., Huang, Z., Huang, S., & Gu, L. (2013) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2013.02.003 · Cited by 34
Moorthy, N. S. H. N., Cerqueira, N. M. F. S. A., Ramos, M. J., & Fernandes, P. A. (2010) · Medicinal Chemistry Research · doi:10.1007/s00044-010-9510-3 · Cited by 34
“…cell growth IC 50 (lM) Butkitt CCRF-CEM HeLa HT-29 13H N N H 3 C CH 3 H 0.15 0.62 0.37 0.29 13I N CH 3 H 5.49 7.04 4.53 7.76 13J N CH 3 H 0.20 0.35 0.34 1.93 13K N CH 3 H 0.03 0.14 0.10 0.04 significant predictive ability (Tropsha et al., 2003; Erikkson et al., 2003; Alexander and Alexander, 2002).”
InfluentialLidan, T., Guo, L.-X., Lv, X., & Li, Y. (2016) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2016.10.012 · Cited by 34
Vistoli, G., Mazzolari, A., Testa, B., & Pedretti, A. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00121 · Cited by 34
Eidgahee, D. R., Haddad, A., & Naderpour, H. (2018) · Scientia Iranica · doi:10.24200/sci.2018.5663.1408 · Cited by 34
Jayaraj, J. M., Gopinath, K., Lee, J.-K., & Muthusamy, K. (2018) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2018.1464958 · Cited by 34
“According to the literature, (Golbraikh & Tropsha, 2002; Kirubakaran & Karthikeyan, 2013) 3D-QSAR models are accepted if they satisfy the following conditions: [ 0:5; r2 [ 0:6; ½ðr2 r2oÞ=r2 \0:1; 0:85 k 1:15 and r2m [ 0:5 (1) The r2 value is calculated as R ¼ Pðyi yoÞð~yi…”
BackgroundQSPR modelling for prediction of glass transition temperature of diverse polymers
Khan, P. M., & Roy, K. (2018) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/1062936x.2018.1536078 · Cited by 34
Khan, K., Kar, S., Sanderson, H., Roy, K., & Leszczyński, J. (2018) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201800078 · Cited by 34
Naseri, H., Hosseini, P., Jahanbakhsh, H., Hosseini, P., & Gandomi, A. H. (2022) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-022-02283-w · Cited by 34
Asif, U., Memon, S. A., Javed, M. F., & Kim, J. R. (2024) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings14041091 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Golbraikh, A., & Tropsha, A.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tropsha, Alexander
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 269-276
- ISSN
- 1093-3263 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087661061
- Cited by
- 3,735
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 133 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 179 · 2023: 174 · 2022: 194 · 2021: 197 · 2020: 215 · 2019: 189 · 2018: 200 · 2017: 174 · 2016: 181 · 2015: 175 · 2014: 197 · 2013: 203 · 2012: 202
- FWCI
- 52.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- leave-one-out cross-validation, QSAR model validation, predictive power, external validation, 2D molecular descriptors, overfitting, model evaluation metrics
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Ligands, Mathematical Computing, Models, Molecular, Receptors, Histamine H1, Steroids, Transcortin, Databases, Factual, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Ecdysteroids
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review