Cited by 298Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Impulse control and underlying functions of the left DLPFC mediate age-related and age-independent individual differences in strategic social behavior

Open access
Steinbeis, Nikolaus, Bernhardt, Boris C., Singer, Tania·2012·Neuron

Abstract

Human social exchange is often characterized by conflicts of interest requiring strategic behavior for their resolution. To investigate the development of the cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying strategic behavior, we studied children's decisions while they played two types of economic exchange games with differing demands of strategic behavior. We show an increase of strategic behavior with age, which could not be explained by age-related changes in social preferences but instead by developmental differences in impulsivity and associated brain functions of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Furthermore, observed differences in cortical thickness of lDLPFC were predictive of differences in impulsivity and strategic behavior irrespective of age. We conclude that egoistic behavior in younger children is not caused by a lack of understanding right or wrong, but by the inability to implement behavioral control when tempted to act selfishly; a function relying on brain regions maturing only late in ontogeny.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.027

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinbeis, N., Bernhardt, B. C., & Singer, T.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Steinbeis, Nikolaus
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
73
Issue
5
Pages
1040-1051
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055420785
Cited by
298
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
strategic behavior, impulsivity, left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, cortical thickness, age-related development, individual differences, social preferences, egoism, behavioral control, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aging, Brain Mapping, Child, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Impulsive Behavior, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Social Behavior, Negotiating, Prefrontal Cortex, Statistics, Nonparametric, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review