Cited by 115Child Nutrition and Water AccessPublic Health and Environmental IssuesFecal contamination and water quality

Effects of sewerage on diarrhoea and enteric infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Norman, Guy, Pedley, Steve, Takkouche, Bahi·2010·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background Sanitation is inadequate in most cities in developing countries, with major effects on infectious disease burden: in this situation, is piped sewerage an appropriate solution, or should efforts focus on systems based on onsite solutions, such as latrines? We reviewed the effects of the presence of sewerage systems on diarrhoeal disease and related outcomes. We included only observational studies because so far there have been no randomised controlled trials.Methods We identified relevant studies by use of a comprehensive strategy including searches of Medline and other databases from 1966 to February, 2010. In studies that compared sewerage with one other sanitation category, we used relative risk (RR) estimates for sewerage versus the other category. When a single study made two or more comparisons, we calculated a weighted average RR value, and used this value in our meta-analysis. We used the most adjusted RR estimate provided by the authors; if no adjusted estimate was available, we used the crude estimate. To obtain pooled-effect estimates, meta-analyses were done by use of an inverse variance method-ie, the study-specific adjusted log ORs for case-control and cross-sectional studies, and log RRs for cohort studies, were weighted by the inverse of their variance to compute a pooled RR with 95% CI.Findings 25 studies investigated the association between sewerage and diarrhoea or related outcomes, including presence of intestinal nematodes. Pooled estimates show that sewerage systems typically reduce diarrhoea incidence by about 30% (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61-0.79), or perhaps as much as 60% when starting sanitation conditions are very poor. Studies with objective outcome measures showed even stronger pooled effect than studies that assessed diarrhoea incidence with interviews, while sensitivity analysis indicated that the effect remains even if we assume strong residual confounding.Interpretation Sewerage interventions seem to reduce the incidence of diarrhoea and related outcomes. However, we urge cautious interpretation of these findings, because, in many contexts, sewerage might be less cost effective and sustainable than onsite alternatives.Funding None.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70123-7

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norman, G., Pedley, S., & Takkouche, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
Corresponding author
Norman, Guy
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
536-544
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159218216
Cited by
115
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Public Health and Environmental Issues
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
Keywords
sewerage, diarrhea, gastrointestinal infections, sanitation, latrines, on-site sanitation, intestinal nematodes, sanitation interventions, developing countries
MeSH terms
Diarrhea, Humans, Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic, Sanitation, Sewage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review