CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 41

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chapter 5 Potential Pitfalls of Affect Convergence in Teams: Functions and Dysfunctions of Group Affective Tone

George, Jennifer M., King, Eden B.·2007·Research on Managing Groups and Teams
DOI 10.1016/s1534-0856(07)10005-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We propose that group affective tone may be dysfunctional for teams faced with complex, equivocal, and dynamically changing tasks and environments. Group affective tone (and in particular, a positive affective tone) may exacerbate pre-existing tendencies of teams to develop a single-shared reality that team members confidently believe to be valid and to be prone to group-centrism. Alternatively, heterogeneity in member mood states within teams may lead to the development of multiple-shared realities that reflect the equivocality of the teams’ tasks and circumstances and other functional outcomes (e.g., multiple perspectives and minority dissent), which ultimately may enhance team effectiveness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1534-0856(07)10005-0

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. A. Abele, 1992, Polish Psychological Bulletin, 23, 187
  2. G.M. Wittenbaum, A.B. Hollingshead, P.B. Paulus, R.Y. Hirokawa, D.G. Ancona, R.S. Peterson, K.A. Jehn, K. Yoon, 2004, Small Group Research, 35, 17, 10.1177/1046496403259459 · DOI
  3. G. Echterhoff, E.T. Higgins, S. Groll, 2005, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 257, 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.257 · DOI
  4. L. Festinger, 1954, Human Relations, 7, 117, 10.1177/001872675400700202 · DOI · Paper page
  5. J.P. Forgas, J.M. George, 2001, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 3, 10.1006/obhd.2001.2971 · DOI · Paper page
  6. K. Gasper, 2003, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 248, 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00023-4 · DOI
  7. J.M. George, 1990, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107, 10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.107 · DOI · Paper page
  8. J.M. George, 1995, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 778, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01775.x · DOI
  9. J.M. George, L.R. James, 1993, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 798, 10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.798 · DOI
  10. J.M. George, J. Zhou, 2002, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 687, 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.687 · DOI · Paper page
  11. C.C.J. Gersick, 1988, Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9, 10.2307/256496 · DOI
  12. R.S. Baron, S.I. Hoppe, C.F. Kao, B. Brunsman, B. Linneweh, D. Rogers, 1996, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 537, 10.1006/jesp.1996.0024 · DOI
  13. C.B. Gibson, 2003, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2153, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01879.x · DOI
  14. M.J. Grawitch, D.C. Munz, E.K. Elliott, A. Mathis, 2003, Group dynamics: Theory, research, and practice, 7, 200, 10.1037/1089-2699.7.3.200 · DOI
  15. M.J. Grawitch, D.C. Munz, T.J. Kramer, 2003, Group dynamics: Theory, research, and practice, 7, 41, 10.1037/1089-2699.7.1.41 · DOI
  16. D.P. Green, P. Salovey, K.M. Truax, 1999, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 856, 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.856 · DOI
  17. R.Y. Hirokawa, 1990, Small Group Research, 21, 190, 10.1177/1046496490212003 · DOI
  18. G. Kaufmann, S.K. Vosburg, 1997, Cognition and Emotion, 11, 151, 10.1080/026999397379971 · DOI
  19. J.R. Kelly, S.G. Barsade, 2001, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 99, 10.1006/obhd.2001.2974 · DOI · Paper page
  20. S.G. Barsade, D.E. Gibson, 1998, Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 1, 81
  21. A.W. Kruglanski, T. Freund, 1983, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448, 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90022-7 · DOI · Paper page
  22. A.W. Kruglanski, A. Pierro, L. Mannetti, E. De Grada, 2006, Psychological Review, 113, 84, 10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.84 · DOI
  23. A.W. Kruglanski, J.Y. Shah, A. Pierro, L. Mannetti, 2002, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 648, 10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.648 · DOI
  24. J.M. Levine, T.E. Higgins, H.-S. Choi, 2000, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 88, 10.1006/obhd.2000.2889 · DOI
  25. C.M. Mason, M.A. Griffin, 2003, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 667, 10.1002/job.210 · DOI
  26. G.J. Meyer, J.R. Shack, 1989, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 691, 10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.691 · DOI
  27. C.J. Nemeth, 1986, Psychological Review, 93, 23, 10.1037/0033-295X.93.1.23 · DOI
  28. C. Nemeth, K. Brown, J. Rogers, 2001, European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 707, 10.1002/ejsp.58 · DOI
  29. G.A. Neuman, S.H. Wagner, N.D. Christiansen, 1999, Group and Organization Management, 24, 28, 10.1177/1059601199241003 · DOI
  30. M. Orlitzky, R.Y. Hirokawa, 2001, Small Group Research, 32, 313, 10.1177/104649640103200303 · DOI
  31. J.A. Russell, L. Feldman Barrett, 1999, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805, 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.805 · DOI
  32. B. Schneider, 1987, Personnel Psychology, 40, 437, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x · DOI
  33. N. Schwarz, G.L. Clore, 1983, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513, 10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513 · DOI · Paper page
  34. N. Schwarz, G.L. Clore, 2003, Psychological Inquiry, 14, 296, 10.1207/S15327965PLI1403&4_20 · DOI
  35. J.A. Sniezek, 1992, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 124, 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90048-C · DOI
  36. G. Stasser, D. Stewart, 1992, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426, 10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.426 · DOI
  37. T. Sy, S. Cote, R. Saavedra, 2005, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 295, 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.295 · DOI
  38. P. Totterdell, 2000, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 848, 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.848 · DOI · Paper page
  39. P. Totterdell, S. Kellett, K. Teuchmann, R.B. Briner, 1998, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1504, 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1504 · DOI · Paper page
  40. P. Totterdell, T. Wall, D. Holman, H. Diamond, O. Epitoropaki, 2004, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 854, 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.854 · DOI
  41. C.A. Bowers, J.A. Pharmer, E. Salas, 2000, Small Group Research, 31, 305, 10.1177/104649640003100303 · DOI · Paper page
  42. S.K. Vosburg, 1998, Creativity Research Journal, 11, 165, 10.1207/s15326934crj1102_6 · DOI
  43. S.K. Vosburg, 1998, Creativity Research Journal, 11, 315, 10.1207/s15326934crj1104_5 · DOI
  44. D. Watson, L.A. Clark, A. Tellegen, 1988, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063, 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
  45. D. Watson, J.W. Pennebaker, 1989, Psychological Review, 96, 234, 10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.234 · DOI · Paper page
  46. D. Watson, A. Tellegen, 1985, Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219, 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219 · DOI · Paper page
  47. D. Watson, D. Weise, J. Vaidya, A. Tellegen, 1999, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820, 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.820 · DOI · Paper page
  48. D.M. Webster, A.W. Kruglanski, 1998, European Review of Social Psychology, 8, 133

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
George, J. M., & King, E. B.
Venue
Research on Managing Groups and Teams
Publisher
Emerald (MCB UP )
Published
2007
Pages
97-123
ISSN
1534-0856
DOI
10.1016/s1534-0856(07)10005-0
Cited by
41
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review