Affective Influences on Judgments and Behavior in Organizations: An Information Processing Perspective
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Personal importance mediates the affect-cognitive processing relationship during decision making when greater personal importance encourages decision makers to utilize self-serving judgment strategies.
“In addition, personal importance mediates the affect-cognitive processing relationship during decision making when greater personal importance encourages decision makers to utilize self-serving judgment strategies [93].”
From Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers (2010) · cites this paper as [93]
Cites
On the Self-Regulation of Behavior
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174794 · Cited by 4,110 · see citing works
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54 · Cited by 3,480 · see citing works
Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).
Forgas, J. P. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39 · Cited by 3,470 · see citing works
Self-citationPositive affect facilitates creative problem solving.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122 · Cited by 2,986 · see citing works
Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence
George, J. M. (2000) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726700538001 · Cited by 2,027 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0223 · Cited by 1,631 · see citing works
Feeling and Believing: The Influence of Emotion on Trust.
Dunn, J. R., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736 · Cited by 1,301 · see citing works
Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams
Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2974 · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
The Role of Customer Gratitude in Relationship Marketing
Palmatier, R. W., Jarvis, C. B., Bechkoff, J. R., & Kardes, F. R. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.5.1 · Cited by 912 · see citing works
Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2007) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20077 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Zhang, P. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.1.11 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Affect, emotion, and decision making
George, J. M., & Dane, E. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.06.004 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Self-citationOn being happy and gullible: Mood effects on skepticism and the detection of deception
Forgas, J. P., & East, R. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.010 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Self-citationWhy and When Leaders’ Affective States Influence Employee Upward Voice
Liu, W., Song, Z., Li, X., & Liao, Z. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2013.1082 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.505 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
McCaughey, D., & Bruning, N. S. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-39 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Wang, L., Restubog, S., Shao, B., Lu, V., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0460 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Leadership and affect: moving the hearts and minds of followers
van Knippenberg, D., & van Kleef, G. A. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1160515 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Chou, S., & Chen, C.-W. (2018) · Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-08-2017-0187 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Nanyang Technological University, Chandra, S., Srivastava, S., HEC School of Management, P., Theng, Y.-L., & Nanyang Technological University (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00310 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Beckmann, N., Wood, R. E., & Minbashian, A. (2010) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.07.004 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Tee, E. (. J., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Paulsen, N. (2013) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.03.005 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Forgas, J. P. (2017) · Australian Psychologist · doi:10.1111/ap.12232 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationEmotional influence in groups: the dynamic nexus of affect, cognition, and behavior
van Kleef, G. A., Heerdink, M. W., & Homan, A. C. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.017 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Takeuchi, R., Guo, N., Teschner, R. S., & Kautz, J. (2021) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000949 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Dans le secret des comités de direction, le rôle des émotions: proposition d'un modèle théorique
Haag, C., & Laroche, H. (2009) · M@n@gement · doi:10.3917/mana.122.0082 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Solar energy surge: The socio-economic determinants of the photovoltaic systems growth in Australia
Fuentes, P. M. J., Khalilpour, K., & Voinov, A. (2024) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103695 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Rice University (US)
- ORCID
- Forgas, Joseph P.
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-34
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999965170
- Cited by
- 898
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 23.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- affective states, mood, affect infusion model, information processing, decision-making, employee motivation, creativity, performance evaluation (human resources), selection interviews, interpersonal communication, absenteeism, negotiation, labour market flexibility, organizational behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
